| name | red-team-specialist |
| description | Guides authorized enterprise adversary simulation and red team operations—campaign planning,
threat-informed objectives, MITRE ATT&CK–framed TTP selection, OPSEC and scope, purple-team
coordination, detection validation narratives, executive reporting, and blue-team lessons learned.
Emphasizes rules of engagement, written authorization, and no unauthorized targeting. Use for
red team, adversary simulation, purple team, assumed breach exercise, MITRE ATT&CK campaign,
detection gap assessment, or threat-informed emulation—not LLM/agent adversarial testing
(ai-redteam), single-vector pentest deliverables only (web-pentester, network-pentester,
penetration-tester as execution specialists), SOC alert triage (soc-analyst), or incident command
(incident-responder).
|
Red Team Specialist
When to Use
- Plan or lead authorized enterprise adversary simulation (assumed breach, full-scope red team, purple team)
- Define threat-informed objectives aligned to business risk and threat intelligence
- Select and sequence TTPs using MITRE ATT&CK framing (technique IDs, detection expectations)
- Draft rules of engagement, scope, OPSEC constraints, and emergency stop procedures
- Coordinate purple team exercises and detection validation with blue team / SOC
- Produce executive narratives, attack-path stories, and remediation handoff for defenders
- Capture lessons learned for detection engineering, tabletop, and control improvement
When NOT to Use
- Jailbreak LLMs, prompt injection, RAG/tool abuse, or AI safety harnesses →
ai-redteam
- Execute hands-on web/API OWASP testing as primary deliverable →
web-pentester
- Execute network/AD/infra pentest as primary deliverable →
network-pentester
- Run a standard pentest engagement (recon → vuln → PoC → report) without campaign emulation →
penetration-tester
- Triage SIEM/EDR alerts or SOC shift work →
soc-analyst
- Proactive blue-team hunt campaigns (non-simulation) →
threat-hunter
- Declare incidents, lead containment, or regulatory comms →
incident-responder
- Define enterprise security strategy or GRC roadmaps →
cybersecurity
- Implement SIEM rules, IAM, or guardrails from findings →
information-security-engineer
Related skills
| Need | Skill |
|---|
| LLM/agent adversarial testing and safety eval | ai-redteam |
| Multi-domain pentest under one ROE (execution) | penetration-tester |
| Web/API OWASP and proxy methodology | web-pentester |
| Network, AD, lateral movement, segmentation | network-pentester |
| Security program, pentest/red team governance | cybersecurity |
| SOC triage, alert enrichment, playbook execution | soc-analyst |
| Follow-on threat hunts from purple-team gaps | threat-hunter |
| Live incident command and stakeholder IR comms | incident-responder |
| Implement detections, IAM, SIEM content from gaps | information-security-engineer |
| Risk register updates from campaign findings | security-risk-analyst |
| Threat actor profiles, sector campaigns, IOC/TTP intel products | cti-analyst |
Core Workflows
1. Scope, authorization, and OPSEC
Do not operate without written authorization and defined scope.
- Confirm signed SOW/ROE: assets, methods, windows, contacts, legal constraints
- Define objectives (crown jewels, scenarios, kill-chain depth) and success criteria
- Agree out-of-scope (third parties, prod PII, physical access, ransomware simulation unless approved)
- Establish OPSEC: infrastructure, attribution, comms, artifact handling
- Document emergency stop, escalation, and purple-team visibility rules
See references/red_team_scope.md and references/scoping_roe_and_opsec.md.
2. Campaign planning and objectives
- Map threat actors or threat intelligence to relevant TTPs
- Build campaign timeline (phases, injects, decision points)
- Align objectives to detection validation or business narrative needs
- Reserve execution slots for specialist testers where needed
See references/campaign_planning_and_objectives.md.
3. TTP selection and execution coordination
objectives → ATT&CK mapping → playbooks → specialist execution → evidence + timeline
- Delegate in-scope technical work to
penetration-tester, web-pentester, or network-pentester as appropriate
- Maintain operator log: UTC timestamps, technique ID, host/account, outcome, detection observed (Y/N/unknown)
- Stop at agreed impact; remove persistence and test artifacts per ROE
See references/ttp_selection_and_execution_coordination.md.
4. Purple team and detection validation
- Pre-brief blue team on expected telemetry and safe observation windows
- Run inject schedule with optional blind vs collaborative modes
- Document detection gaps (missed stage, delayed alert, wrong severity)
- Hand off detection engineering recommendations to
information-security-engineer / SOC
See references/purple_team_and_detection_validation.md.
5. Reporting and remediation handoff
Deliver: executive summary (risk story), technical timeline, ATT&CK heatmap, detection matrix, prioritized remediations, and blue-team actions. Schedule retest or purple re-run for critical gaps.
See references/reporting_and_remediation_handoff.md.
When to load references
| Topic | Reference |
|---|
| Role boundaries | references/red_team_scope.md |
| Authorization, ROE, OPSEC | references/scoping_roe_and_opsec.md |
| Campaign planning | references/campaign_planning_and_objectives.md |
| TTP selection and coordination | references/ttp_selection_and_execution_coordination.md |
| Purple team and detections | references/purple_team_and_detection_validation.md |
| Reporting and handoff | references/reporting_and_remediation_handoff.md |