| name | nda-triage |
| description | Rapid NDA screening with GREEN/YELLOW/RED classification. 10-point checklist for incoming NDAs. Use when triaging NDAs, screening non-disclosure agreements, or routing NDAs for approval.
|
| license | MIT + Commons Clause |
| metadata | {"version":"1.0.0","author":"The Glass Room","category":"legal","domain":"nda-screening","updated":"2026-04-10T00:00:00.000Z","tags":["nda","screening","triage","non-disclosure","legal-review"]} |
⚠️ EXPERIMENTAL — This skill is provided for educational and informational purposes only. It does NOT constitute legal advice. All responsibility for usage rests with the user. Consult qualified legal professionals before acting on any output.
NDA Triage
Rapid NDA screening tool that classifies incoming NDAs as GREEN (standard approval), YELLOW (counsel review), or RED (significant issues). Uses a 10-point screening checklist to evaluate agreement structure, definitions, obligations, carveouts, and problematic provisions.
Table of Contents
Tools
NDA Screener
Scans NDA text for red flags and outputs GREEN/YELLOW/RED classification with reasoning.
python scripts/nda_screener.py nda_draft.txt
python scripts/nda_screener.py incoming_nda.md --json
python scripts/nda_screener.py nda_draft.txt --output screening.json --json
What it detects:
- Missing standard carveouts (public knowledge, prior possession, independent development, third-party receipt, legal compulsion)
- Non-solicitation and non-compete clauses
- Perpetual confidentiality obligations
- Overbroad definition of confidential information
- Residuals clauses granting usage rights to ideas/concepts
- IP assignment or license grants
- Liquidated damages provisions
- Unlimited audit rights
- One-sided obligations
Classification Rules:
| Level | Criteria | Routing |
|---|
| GREEN | All 5 carveouts present, no problematic provisions, standard structure | Business approver; no counsel needed |
| YELLOW | 1-2 missing carveouts, minor problematic provisions, or non-standard terms | Legal counsel review within 48 hours |
| RED | 3+ missing carveouts, non-compete/non-solicitation, IP assignment, perpetual term with no exit | Senior counsel review; do not sign |
NDA Checklist
Generates a compliance checklist for an NDA, checking all 10 screening criteria with pass/fail status.
python scripts/nda_checklist.py nda_draft.txt
python scripts/nda_checklist.py nda_draft.txt --json
python scripts/nda_checklist.py nda_draft.txt --output checklist.json --json
10-Point Screening Criteria:
| # | Criterion | What It Checks |
|---|
| 1 | Agreement Structure | Mutual vs. one-way; parties identified; purpose stated |
| 2 | Definition of Confidential Info | Scope, specificity, marking requirements |
| 3 | Obligations | Standard of care, use restrictions, disclosure limits |
| 4 | Standard Carveouts | 5 required: public knowledge, prior possession, independent development, third-party receipt, legal compulsion |
| 5 | Permitted Disclosures | Representatives, advisors, affiliates with need-to-know |
| 6 | Term & Duration | Reasonable term, survival period, obligations after expiry |
| 7 | Return/Destruction | Obligation to return or destroy upon request/termination |
| 8 | Remedies | Injunctive relief, damages, indemnification scope |
| 9 | Problematic Provisions | Non-solicitation, non-compete, exclusivity, residuals, IP assignment, audit rights |
| 10 | Governing Law | Jurisdiction, dispute resolution mechanism |
Reference Guides
NDA Screening Criteria
references/nda_screening_criteria.md
Complete evaluation reference covering:
- All 10 screening criteria with detailed sub-items
- GREEN/YELLOW/RED classification rules with specific examples
- Common NDA issues with standard positions
- Redline approaches for common problems
Workflows
Standard NDA Triage
- Receive NDA -- Save as
.txt or .md file
- Screen -- Run
nda_screener.py for quick RED/YELLOW/GREEN classification
- Checklist -- Run
nda_checklist.py for detailed 10-point evaluation
- Route -- Follow routing recommendations based on classification
- Track -- Log screening result and routing decision
Bulk NDA Processing
for nda in ndas/*.txt; do
echo "=== $nda ==="
python scripts/nda_screener.py "$nda"
echo ""
done
for nda in ndas/*.txt; do
python scripts/nda_screener.py "$nda" --json --output "results/$(basename $nda .txt).json"
done
Routing Recommendations
| Classification | Approver | Timeline | Escalation |
|---|
| GREEN | Business owner or designated approver | Same day; sign within 24 hours | None required |
| YELLOW | Legal counsel review | 48-hour turnaround | Escalate to senior counsel if no response in 72 hours |
| RED | Senior legal counsel | 5 business day turnaround | Escalate to General Counsel if deal-critical |
GREEN Fast-Track Conditions
All of the following must be true for GREEN classification:
- Mutual NDA (both parties bound)
- All 5 standard carveouts present
- No non-solicitation, non-compete, or exclusivity clauses
- No IP assignment or license grants
- No residuals clause
- Term is 2-5 years (not perpetual)
- Return/destruction obligation present
- Standard remedies (injunctive relief, no liquidated damages)
RED Escalation Triggers
Any one of the following triggers RED classification:
- Non-compete clause of any scope
- Non-solicitation clause covering employees or customers
- IP assignment or broad license grant
- Missing 3 or more standard carveouts
- Perpetual obligations with no termination right
- Liquidated damages for breach
- Exclusivity provision
Troubleshooting
| Problem | Cause | Solution |
|---|
| Screener classifies everything as YELLOW | NDA uses non-standard formatting that breaks pattern matching | Ensure NDA is clean plain text; remove PDF artifacts and headers/footers |
| Missing carveouts false positive | Carveouts are present but use unusual language | Review the full "Exceptions" or "Exclusions" section manually; the screener checks common phrasings |
| Non-compete not detected | Non-compete is embedded in definitions or obligations section rather than standalone | Search the full document for "compete", "competitive", "restrict" manually |
| Checklist shows PASS but screener shows RED | Checklist evaluates presence; screener evaluates content quality | Use both tools together; the screener's RED overrides checklist PASS |
| Script errors on large files | NDA text exceeds expected size (>100KB) | Ensure the file contains only the NDA text, not appendices or exhibits |
Success Criteria
- NDA triage under 5 minutes: Automated screening replaces 30-minute manual review.
- Zero missed RED-severity issues: Every non-compete, IP assignment, and missing carveout is flagged.
- GREEN NDAs signed within 24 hours: Fast-track routing eliminates bottleneck for standard agreements.
- YELLOW NDAs resolved within 48 hours: Counsel review turnaround meets SLA.
- Consistent classification across reviewers: 10-point checklist eliminates subjective "looks fine" approvals.
- 100% of NDAs screened before routing: No NDA reaches an approver without automated triage.
Scope & Limitations
Covers:
- Pattern-based screening of NDA text for structural issues and problematic provisions
- 10-point compliance checklist against standard NDA requirements
- GREEN/YELLOW/RED classification with routing recommendations
- Detection of non-solicitation, non-compete, IP assignment, residuals, and other problematic clauses
- Missing carveout identification
Does NOT cover:
- Legal advice -- classification is a screening aid, not a legal opinion
- Negotiation or redlining -- use
nda-review for deep clause analysis and redline generation
- Multi-party NDAs -- optimized for bilateral (two-party) agreements
- Industry-specific NDA requirements (healthcare, defense, government) -- patterns target commercial NDAs
- Non-English NDAs -- pattern matching is English-language only
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Better Approach |
|---|
| Signing GREEN-classified NDAs without any human review | Automated screening cannot catch business-context risks (e.g., NDA with a direct competitor) | GREEN classification means low legal risk, not zero risk; business approver must still review |
| Using triage as a substitute for deep NDA review on complex deals | Triage checks structure and red flags, not clause quality or negotiation position | Run nda-review skill for M&A, joint venture, or high-value partnership NDAs |
| Ignoring YELLOW classifications because "it's just an NDA" | YELLOW items like missing carveouts or residuals clauses create real legal exposure | Route all YELLOW NDAs to counsel; missing independent development carveout alone can cost millions |
| Treating all NDAs as equal regardless of counterparty relationship | NDA with a startup partner requires different scrutiny than NDA with a Fortune 500 vendor | Adjust review depth based on counterparty, deal value, and information sensitivity |
Tool Reference
nda_screener.py
Purpose: Scans NDA text for red flags and problematic provisions. Outputs GREEN/YELLOW/RED classification with detailed reasoning.
Usage:
python scripts/nda_screener.py <nda_file> [--json] [--output FILE]
Flags:
| Flag | Short | Default | Description |
|---|
nda_file | (positional) | | Path to NDA text file (.txt or .md) |
--json | | off | Output in JSON format |
--output | -o | (stdout) | Write output to file |
Example Output (JSON):
{
"file": "vendor_nda.txt",
"classification": "YELLOW",
"red_flags": [
{
"id": "missing_carveout_independent_development",
"severity": "YELLOW",
"description": "Missing independent development carveout",
"recommendation": "Add standard independent development exception"
}
],
"carveouts": {
"public_knowledge": true,
"prior_possession": true,
"independent_development": false,
"third_party_receipt": true,
"legal_compulsion":
nda_checklist.py
Purpose: Generates a 10-point compliance checklist for an NDA, evaluating each screening criterion as PASS/FAIL with notes.
Usage:
python scripts/nda_checklist.py <nda_file> [--json] [--output FILE]
Flags:
| Flag | Short | Default | Description |
|---|
nda_file | (positional) | | Path to NDA text file (.txt or .md) |
--json | | off | Output in JSON format |
--output | -o | (stdout) | Write output to file |
Example Output:
NDA COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST
========================
File: vendor_nda.txt
Overall: YELLOW (8/10 PASS)
# Criterion Status Notes
1 Agreement Structure PASS Mutual NDA; both parties identified
2 Definition of Confidential PASS Reasonably scoped with marking requirement
3 Obligations PASS Standard of care; use restrictions present
4 Standard Carveouts FAIL Missing: independent development
5 Permitted Disclosures PASS Representatives and advisors covered
6 Term & Duration PASS 3-year term with 2-year survival
7 Return/Destruction PASS Return or destroy within 30 days
8 Remedies PASS Injunctive relief; no liquidated damages
9 Problematic Provisions FAIL Residuals clause detected
10 Governing Law PASS Delaware law; state courts
