abstention-under-missing-or-false-premise
Use this skill when the right answer is not to guess, but to say the conversation never established the needed fact. Trigger it for false-premise questions, near-miss memories, or adversarial follow-ups that sound plausible but are unsupported by history. Everyday examples include: 'how many fish are in my 30-gallon tank?' when only other tank sizes were mentioned, 'what did my third sister say?' when no third sister exists in history, and 'which model did I buy?' when the chat only discussed options.
معلومات المصدر
- المستودع
- Dingxingdi/paper_fast_search_backup
- آخر نشاط في المصدر
- ٨ أبريل ٢٠٢٦ في ١٥:١٤
- لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
- الإنجليزية
- النجوم
- ٠
- التفرعات
- ٠
خيارات التثبيت
يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.
مراجعة ملفات المصدر
اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.
مستكشف الملفات
4 ملفاتعرض SKILL.md
SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط- name
- abstention-under-missing-or-false-premise
- description
- Use this skill when the right answer is not to guess, but to say the conversation never established the needed fact. Trigger it for false-premise questions, near-miss memories, or adversarial follow-ups that sound plausible but are unsupported by history. Everyday examples include: 'how many fish are in my 30-gallon tank?' when only other tank sizes were mentioned, 'what did my third sister say?' when no third sister exists in history, and 'which model did I buy?' when the chat only discussed options.
# Skill: abstention-under-missing-or-false-premise
## 1. Capability Definition & Real Case
* **Professional Definition**: The ability to recognize that the dialogue history does not support the user’s question, especially when the question contains an incorrect assumption, and to answer with calibrated non-knowledge rather than hallucinated completion.
* **Dimension Hierarchy**: Conversational Memory->Persistent Personal Memory->abstention-under-missing-or-false-premise
### Real Case
**[Case 1]**
* **Initial Environment**: The long-term chat history contains mentions of a 10-gallon tank and a 20-gallon tank, but there is no mention of a 30-gallon tank. The user asks a seemingly concrete follow-up that presupposes such a tank exists.
* **Real Question**: How many fish are there in my 30-gallon tank?
* **Real Trajectory**: 1. Search the history for all tank-related mentions. 2. Notice that only 10-gallon and 20-gallon tanks appear. 3. Check whether a 30-gallon tank can be inferred from any update or comparison. 4. Refuse to fabricate and answer that the history does not mention a 30-gallon tank.
* **Real Answer**: You did not mention that you have a 30-gallon tank.
* **Why this demonstrates the capability**: The challenge is resisting the strong urge to complete a plausible but unsupported story. A strong assistant must detect the false premise, ground itself in the actual interaction history, and abstain clearly without inventing fish counts.
## Pipeline Execution Instructions
To synthesize data for this capability, you must strictly follow a 3-phase pipeline. **Do not hallucinate steps.** Read the corresponding reference file for each phase sequentially:
1. **Phase 1: Environment Exploration**
Read the exploration guidelines to discover raw knowledge seeds:
`references/EXPLORATION.md`
2. **Phase 2: Trajectory Selection**
Once Phase 1 is complete, read the selection criteria to evaluate the trajectory:
`references/SELECTION.md`
3. **Phase 3: Data Synthesis**
Once a trajectory passes Phase 2, read the synthesis instructions to generate the final data:
`references/SYNTHESIS.md`
عرض على GitHub