Skip to main content

milestone-review

Milestone progress review — completeness, quality metrics, risk, go/no-go recommendation. At checkpoints or before a deadline.

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٨ أكتوبر ٢٠٢٦ في ٠٦:٥٢
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
٢٦٬١٥٨
التفرعات
٣٬٧٠٢

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
milestone-review
description
Milestone progress review — completeness, quality metrics, risk, go/no-go recommendation. At checkpoints or before a deadline.
argument-hint
[milestone-name|current] [--review full|lean|solo]
user-invocable
true
allowed-tools
Read, Glob, Grep, Write, Agent, AskUserQuestion, Bash(bash "*/.claude/skills/milestone-review/../../hooks/yaml-helper.sh" resolve_config *)
model
sonnet
!`bash "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../hooks/yaml-helper.sh" resolve_config --keys review_mode,automation,workflow` Resolved above — use as-is; `--review` overrides `review_mode` for this run. No block → defaults in `.claude/docs/config-resolution.md`. # Milestone Review ## Insufficient input — check this before producing any report **If the inputs this skill needs do not exist, the answer is "could not run" — not a filled-in report.** Check first, and stop if the check fails. 1. List the inputs this skill reads (data files, prior reports, profiler output, test results, registries, source code). 2. For each, record `FOUND` or `ABSENT` — not "assumed present". 3. If any input required for a section is ABSENT, that section is **`NOT ASSESSED — NO DATA`**. Do not estimate it, do not infer it from an adjacent artifact, and do not leave a mandated cell to be filled by whoever reads the template next. 4. If **every** required input is ABSENT, stop and report **`NOT ASSESSED — NO DATA`** as the whole verdict, naming what was missing and which skill produces it. **A verdict of `NOT ASSESSED` is a success.** It is the correct, useful answer to "what does the data say?" when there is no data. The failure mode this prevents is specific: a report whose verdict enum has no "could not run" state produces **false clean passes** — an asset audit returning COMPLIANT on a project with no assets and no standards, or a performance profile reporting ">99% headroom against a 16.67ms budget" with zero profiler data and no budget ever set. **Absence of evidence is never evidence of absence.** A scan that finds no matches because there are no files to scan has not verified anything. Say which of the two happened — a reader cannot tell from a green result. --- ## Phase 0: Parse Arguments Extract the milestone name (`current` or a specific name). See `.claude/docs/director-gates.md` for the full check pattern. Individual gate definitions live in `.claude/docs/director-gates/[gate-id].md` — the spawned agent reads its own gate file; do not read it in the parent session. Every `AskUserQuestion` call follows `.claude/docs/automation-modes.md` (collaborative asks always · guided major-only · autonomous logs and proceeds; `automation_always_ask` categories always prompt). --- ## Phase 1: Load Milestone Data Read the milestone definition from `production/milestones/` if it exists. If the argument is `current`, use the most recently modified milestone file. > **No skill writes `production/milestones/`** — definitions are authored by hand > from `.claude/docs/templates/milestone-definition.md`, so most projects have > none. When the directory is absent or empty, say so and review against the > sprint reports alone; do not fabricate a definition. Take care with `current`: > this skill writes its own output as `[milestone-name]-review.md`, so a > most-recently-modified match can be a previous *review* rather than a > definition. Skip files ending `-review.md` when selecting. Gather the sprint reports for sprints within this milestone from `production/sprints/`. Establish the denominator (glob them, count **N**), then scan the sections a milestone review actually aggregates rather than reading each report whole: ``` Grep pattern="^## (Sprint Goal|Capacity|Tasks|Carryover|Risks|Progress|Burndown Assessment|Emerging Risks|Definition of Done)" glob="production/sprints/sprint-*.md" output_mode="content" -A 12 ``` > **These alternates are copied from `/sprint-plan`'s emitted headings — keep > them in sync with it, not with what a milestone review wishes existed.** The > previous pattern asked for `Summary|Goal|Velocity|Completed|Blockers| > Retrospective`, none of which `/sprint-plan` writes (it emits `## Sprint > Goal`, not `## Goal`). Only `Carryover` matched — and that was the trap: a > non-zero match count meant the zero-match escape hatch below could never > fire, so every milestone review silently aggregated carryover tables and > nothing else while reporting full coverage. Full-read a single sprint report when its scanned sections point outside themselves, or when it matched nothing — a zero-match report predates the template and must be read, never silently dropped from the milestone's history. Report any sprint that contributed nothing: a milestone summary that quietly omits a sprint understates the work and the slippage both. **Blocked stories** — the Blocked table and the blocked story count passed to PR-MILESTONE — are not in the sprint reports' scanned sections. Read them where they are recorded: the `status: blocked` stories in `production/sprint-status.yaml` (with their `blocker` field) and, for stories outside that sprint, one grep: ``` Grep pattern="^> \*\*Status\*\*: Blocked|BLOCKED:" glob="production/epics/**/story-*.md" output_mode="content" ``` Each blocked story goes in the Blocked table under the feature its epic folder implements, with its blocker (the yaml `blocker` field or the story's `BLOCKED:` note). With no story files and no `sprint-status.yaml`, the Blocked table and the blocked story count are `NOT ASSESSED — NO DATA`, not zero. --- ## Phase 2: Scan Codebase Health - Scan for `TODO`, `FIXME`, `HACK` markers that indicate incomplete work - Count open bugs by severity for Quality Metrics from `production/qa/bugs/` (one grep of the `**Severity**` and `**Status**` lines, as `/bug-triage` does); with no bug files, the bug lines are `NOT ASSESSED — NO DATA`, not zero - Check the risk register at `production/risk-register/` if it exists (hand-authored from `.claude/docs/templates/risk-register-entry.md`; no skill writes it, so absence is normal — note it rather than skipping risk assessment silently) --- ## Phase 3: Generate the Milestone Review ```markdown # Milestone Review: [Milestone Name] ## Overview - **Target Date**: [Date] - **Current Date**: [Today] - **Days Remaining**: [N] - **Sprints Completed**: [X/Y] ## Feature Completeness ### Fully Complete Only a feature whose Status is `Complete` goes here or counts toward the completion percentage; a Deferred feature stays in its denominator, named with the milestone it moved to. | Feature | Acceptance Criteria | Test Status | |---------|-------------------|-------------| ### Partially Complete | Feature | % Done | Remaining Work | Risk to Milestone | |---------|--------|---------------|------------------| ### Blocked A started feature whose stories are Blocked goes here, not under Partially Complete — name the blocker, so the review says why it stalled, not only that the count moved. | Feature | Blocked Stories | Blocker | Next Action / Owner | |---------|----------------|---------|---------------------| ### Not Started | Feature | Priority | Can Cut? | Impact of Cutting | |---------|----------|----------|------------------| ## Quality Metrics - **Open S1 Bugs**: [N] -- [List] - **Open S2 Bugs**: [N] - **Open S3 Bugs**: [N] - **Test Coverage**: [X%] - **Performance**: [Within budget? Details] ## Code Health - **TODO count**: [N across codebase] - **FIXME count**: [N] - **HACK count**: [N] - **Technical debt items**: [List critical ones] ## Risk Assessment | Risk | Status | Impact if Realized | Mitigation Status | |------|--------|-------------------|------------------| ## Velocity Analysis - **Planned vs Completed** (across all sprints): [X/Y tasks = Z%] - **Trend**: [Improving / Stable / Declining] - **Adjusted estimate for remaining work**: [Days needed at current velocity] ## Scope Recommendations ### Protect (Must ship with milestone) - [Feature and why] ### At Risk (May need to cut or simplify) - [Feature and risk] ### Cut Candidates (Can defer without compromising milestone) - [Feature and impact of cutting] ## Go/No-Go Assessment **Recommendation**: [NOT ASSESSED / GO / CONDITIONAL GO / NO-GO] **Conditions** (if conditional): - [Condition 1 that must be met] - [Condition 2 that must be met] **Rationale**: [Explanation of the recommendation] ## Action Items | # | Action | Owner | Deadline | |---|--------|-------|----------| ``` --- ## Phase 3b: Producer Risk Assessment **Review mode check** — apply before spawning PR-MILESTONE: - `solo` → skip. Note: "PR-MILESTONE skipped — Solo mode." Present the Go/No-Go section without a producer verdict. - `lean` → skip (not a PHASE-GATE). Note: "PR-MILESTONE skipped — Lean mode." Present the Go/No-Go section without a producer verdict. - `full` → spawn as normal. Before generating the Go/No-Go recommendation, spawn `producer` via `Agent` using gate **PR-MILESTONE** (`.claude/docs/director-gates/pr-milestone.md`). Pass: milestone name and target date, current completion percentage, blocked story count, velocity data from sprint reports (if available), list of cut candidates. Present the producer's assessment inline within the Go/No-Go section. The producer's verdict (ON TRACK / AT RISK / OFF TRACK) informs the overall recommendation. If OFF TRACK, use `AskUserQuestion` before generating the recommendation: - Prompt: "Producer verdict: OFF TRACK. The milestone is in jeopardy. This review will recommend NO-GO. How do you want to proceed?" - Options: - `[A] Accept NO-GO — generate the full review with that recommendation` - `[B] Override to CONDITIONAL GO — I'll document the accepted risks myself` - `[C] Stop — I want to address blockers before generating the review` If AT RISK, use `AskUserQuestion`: - Prompt: "Producer verdict: AT RISK. Milestone may slip. How should the Go/No-Go section be framed?" - Options: - `[A] CONDITIONAL GO — include producer's conditions in the review` - `[B] NO-GO — conditions cannot be met in time` - `[C] GO — I accept the risk and want to proceed` If NOT ASSESSED: name the missing input — it is not ON TRACK, and never recommend GO on it. Supply the input and re-run PR-MILESTONE, or recommend NOT ASSESSED — or CONDITIONAL GO / NO-GO where the review's own findings call for one (the rank in `.claude/docs/director-gates.md`). Do not issue a GO against an OFF TRACK verdict; issue CONDITIONAL GO only if the user explicitly selects [B] above. --- ## Phase 4: Save Review Present the review to the user. Ask: "May I write this to `production/milestones/[milestone-name]-review.md`?" If yes, write the file, creating the directory if needed. Verdict: **COMPLETE** — milestone review saved. If no, stop here. Verdict: **BLOCKED** — user declined write. --- ## Phase 5: Next Steps - Run `/gate-check` for a formal phase gate verdict if this milestone marks a development phase boundary. - Run `/sprint-plan` to adjust the next sprint based on the scope recommendations above (at `workflow: minimal`, which has no sprints, adjust the brief's build order instead).
عرض على GitHub