Skip to main content

make-github-actions-workflow

Create GitHub Actions workflows for CI, automation, or PR management. Use when asked to create, scaffold, or add a GitHub Actions workflow (.yml file under .github/workflows/).

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
dotnet/efcore
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٨ أكتوبر ٢٠٢٦ في ١٨:٢٩
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
١٤٬٧٩٥
التفرعات
٣٬٤٣٥

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
make-github-actions-workflow
description
Create GitHub Actions workflows for CI, automation, or PR management. Use when asked to create, scaffold, or add a GitHub Actions workflow (.yml file under .github/workflows/).
# Create GitHub Actions Workflow Create and configure GitHub Actions workflows that follow this repository's conventions and patterns. Workflows automate tasks like CI validation, PR management, issue labeling, and notifications. ## Repository Conventions This repository uses specific patterns across all workflows. Follow these conventions when creating new workflows: ### File Location and Naming - All workflows live in `.github/workflows/` - Use kebab-case names: `label-and-milestone-issues.yml`, `validate-pr-target-branch.yml` - Start with a descriptive comment block explaining the workflow's purpose ### Runner - Use `ubuntu-latest` for general-purpose jobs - Use `ubuntu-24.04` when a specific OS version is needed (e.g., copilot setup steps) ### Permissions - **Always** declare explicit permissions — never rely on defaults - Use **minimal permissions**: only request what the workflow needs - Common patterns: - Read-only: `permissions: {}` - PR comments: `pull-requests: write` - Issue management: `issues: write` - Code read: `contents: read` - For workflows that need write access to PRs from external contributors, use `pull_request_target` instead of `pull_request` - **Security warning:** `pull_request_target` workflows run in the base repository context with its permissions. Do **not** check out or execute code from the PR branch in these workflows. Instead, use the event payload and/or GitHub API (`actions/github-script`, `github.rest.*`, etc.) to inspect and act on the PR safely. ### Scripting - Use `actions/github-script@v8` for complex logic instead of shell scripts - Write JavaScript with `async/await` — the `github` object (Octokit) and `context` are available - Use `github.rest.*` for REST API calls and `github.graphql()` for GraphQL queries - Access PR/issue data via `context.payload.pull_request`, `context.repo.owner`, `context.repo.repo` - Log with `console.log()` for debugging; use `core.setFailed()` for errors ### Error Handling - Wrap API calls in try/catch blocks - Collect errors and report at the end rather than failing on the first error - Log skipped operations with a reason ## Workflow ### Step 1: Understand the Requirements Before writing the workflow, clarify: - [ ] What event(s) should trigger it? (push, pull_request, check_suite, schedule, etc.) - [ ] What permissions are needed? - [ ] What conditions should gate execution? (author, branch, labels, etc.) - [ ] What API calls are needed? - [ ] Are there rate limiting or idempotency concerns? ### Step 2: Choose the Trigger Event | Use case | Event | Notes | |----------|-------|-------| | PR opened/updated | `pull_request` | Read-only access to PR | | PR with write access | `pull_request_target` | Can comment, label, close | | PR merged | `pull_request_target: [closed]` | Check `github.event.pull_request.merged == true` | | CI checks complete | `check_suite: [completed]` | Filter `app.slug != 'github-actions'` to skip self | | Code pushed | `push` | Filter by branches/paths | | Manual trigger | `workflow_dispatch` | Add `inputs:` for parameters | | Scheduled | `schedule` | Use cron syntax | ### Step 3: Write the Workflow Create the YAML file following this template: ```yaml # Description of what this workflow does and why. name: Descriptive Workflow Name on: <trigger_event>: types: [<event_types>] permissions: <resource>: <read|write> jobs: <job-name>: if: <guard_condition> # Optional: skip when not needed runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Descriptive step name uses: actions/github-script@v8 with: script: | // Your logic here ``` ### Step 4: Implement Guard Conditions Add conditions to avoid unnecessary runs: - Job-level `if:` for event payload checks (e.g., `github.event.check_suite.app.slug != 'github-actions'`) - Early `return` in scripts for PR author, draft status, etc. - Idempotency checks (e.g., hidden HTML comments as tags to prevent duplicate actions) For `pull_request_target` policy workflows that react to `opened`, `edited`, and `reopened`: - On `edited`, return unless `context.payload.changes?.base` is present; title or body edits must not reapply a target-branch policy. - Check permissions for `context.actor`, not only the PR author. A maintainer may edit or reopen an external PR, and that action must use the maintainer's authority. - For `opened`, the actor and author are the same, so perform one permission lookup and reuse it for policy and labeling decisions. - Exclude automation when either the actor or author is a bot. - Encode the prohibited branch class directly (for example, `release/*`) instead of requiring a single allowed branch such as `main`. - If permission lookup fails, stop without taking a destructive action; unknown access is not evidence that the contributor is external. ### Step 5: Validate After creating the workflow: - [ ] Permissions are minimal and explicitly declared - [ ] Uses `actions/github-script@v8` for complex logic - [ ] Guard conditions prevent unnecessary runs - [ ] API calls handle pagination where needed (use `per_page: 100`) - [ ] Error handling doesn't silently swallow failures - [ ] No secrets or tokens are hardcoded - [ ] Workflow doesn't create infinite loops (e.g., a workflow that triggers itself) ## Existing Workflows in This Repository Study these workflows as reference: | Workflow | Trigger | Purpose | |----------|---------|---------| | `validate-pr-target-branch.yml` | `pull_request_target: [opened, edited, reopened]` | Closes external PRs targeting release branches, adds community labels | | `label-and-milestone-issues.yml` | `pull_request_target: [closed]` | Labels and milestones issues when their fixing PR is merged | | `copilot-setup-steps.yml` | `workflow_dispatch`, `push`, `pull_request` | Sets up the development environment for Copilot | | `inter-branch-merge-flow.yml` | `push` to `release/**` | Triggers inter-branch merge via arcade | ## Common Patterns ### Commenting on a PR ```javascript await github.rest.issues.createComment({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, issue_number: prNumber, body: 'Comment text' }); ``` ### Checking User Permissions ```javascript const { data: permissions } = await github.rest.repos.getCollaboratorPermissionLevel({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, username: context.actor }); const hasWriteAccess = ['admin', 'write'].includes(permissions.permission); ``` ### Updating Bot-Owned Comments Idempotently A hidden marker identifies the workflow's comment but does not establish ownership: contributors can place the same marker in their own comments. Match the marker only on a bot-authored comment, then update that comment or create a new one. Preserve the workflow's pinned action SHA and never execute code from a pull-request fork in a `pull_request_target` job. ```javascript const marker = '<!-- validate-pr-target-branch -->'; const comments = await github.paginate(github.rest.issues.listComments, { owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, issue_number: prNumber, per_page: 100 }); const body = `${marker}\nComment text`; const existing = comments.find(comment => comment.user?.type === 'Bot' && comment.body?.includes(marker)); if (existing) { await github.rest.issues.updateComment({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, comment_id: existing.id, body }); } else { await github.rest.issues.createComment({ owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, issue_number: prNumber, body }); } ``` ### Reading Repository Files at a Specific Commit ```javascript const { data: fileData } = await github.rest.repos.getContent({ owner, repo, path: 'eng/Versions.props', ref: commitSha }); const content = Buffer.from(fileData.content, 'base64').toString('utf-8'); ``` ## References - [GitHub Actions documentation](https://docs.github.com/en/actions) - [Workflow syntax](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions) - [Events that trigger workflows](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows) - [actions/github-script](https://github.com/actions/github-script)
عرض على GitHub