Skip to main content

package-spec

Package specification compliance for Elastic integration packages. Covers manifest structure (format_version, conditions, variables, var_groups, provider_permissions, routing rules), changelog schema and semantic version bumps, and alignment with the upstream elastic/package-spec. Use when building or reviewing manifest.yml, changelog.yml, or debugging elastic-package lint/check errors on package metadata.

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
elastic/integration-skills
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٢٤ سبتمبر ٢٠٢٦ في ٠٩:٣٨
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
١٦
التفرعات
٨

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

مستكشف الملفات
5 ملفات

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
package-spec
description
Package specification compliance for Elastic integration packages. Covers manifest structure (format_version, conditions, variables, var_groups, provider_permissions, routing rules), changelog schema and semantic version bumps, and alignment with the upstream elastic/package-spec. Use when building or reviewing manifest.yml, changelog.yml, or debugging elastic-package lint/check errors on package metadata.
license
Apache-2.0
metadata
{"author":"elastic","version":"1.0"}
synced_from
sit-llm/knowledge/skills/manifest/
# package-spec ## Skill authority The rules and patterns defined in this skill and its reference files are the **authoritative source of truth**. When examining existing integrations in the `elastic/integrations` repository for reference, you may encounter patterns that conflict with what is specified here -- many integrations contain legacy patterns that predate current standards. **Always follow this skill over patterns observed in other integrations.** If a reference integration uses a deprecated or prohibited pattern, do not copy it. ## When to use Use this skill when tasks include: - building or reviewing `manifest.yml` at root or data stream level - adding or validating `changelog.yml` entries - selecting the correct change type and semantic version bump - configuring policy templates, inputs, and variable declarations - declaring `var_groups` or `provider_permissions` (schema and floors) - debugging `elastic-package lint` or `elastic-package check` errors on manifests or changelogs - reviewing variable scoping across package, policy template, input, and data stream levels - validating Handlebars template variables against manifest declarations - configuring routing rules and their required manifest flags - determining which `format_version` is needed for a package's features ## When NOT to use - Package scaffolding and directory layout (`create-integration`) - End-to-end Federated Identity / Cloud Connectors enablement on an AWS package (`input-configurations` -> `references/federated-identity-aws.md`) - Ingest pipeline design (`ingest-pipelines`) - Field mapping and ECS compliance (`ecs-field-mappings`) - CEL programs (`cel-programs`) - Transform configuration (see `review-integration` skill's `references/transform-guide.md`) ## Handoff For package directory layout and required files, see `create-integration` -> `references/package-layout.md`. For `elastic-package` CLI commands and troubleshooting, see `elastic-package-cli`. For enabling Federated Identity (Cloud Connectors) on an AWS integration, see `input-configurations` -> `references/federated-identity-aws.md`. --- ## format_version The `format_version` field in `manifest.yml` declares which [elastic/package-spec](https://github.com/elastic/package-spec) version the package conforms to. The current **default** for new packages is `"3.4.2"`. **Use the minimum version that supports the features the package actually uses**, not the latest available spec version. Bumping without needing new features: - forces users to run a newer Kibana than necessary - breaks backward compatibility for no reason - makes it harder to determine which features the package depends on Only bump when the package uses a feature introduced in a newer spec version: | Feature | Minimum format_version | |---------|----------------------| | Basic package structure | 1.0.0 | | Input-level variables | 2.0.0 | | `elasticsearch.privileges` | 2.3.0 | | `routing_rules.yml` support | 2.9.0 | | `lifecycle` field | 3.0.0 | | Secret variables (`secret: true`) | 3.0.0 | | `elasticsearch.source_mode` | 3.0.3 | | `var_groups` | 3.6.1 | | `provider_permissions` (Federated Identity IAM declarations) | 3.6.4 | **Justified exception — Federated Identity:** packages that declare `provider_permissions` (and typically `var_groups`) must use `format_version: "3.6.4"`. That bump activates 3.6.0+ pipeline validators; land pipeline hygiene first if lint surfaces pre-existing violations. See `references/var-groups-and-provider-permissions.md` and `input-configurations` -> `references/federated-identity-aws.md`. See `references/format-version-features.md` for the full feature-to-version table including recent spec additions (3.6.0+), and `references/manifest-rules.md` for the review procedure. --- ## conditions.kibana.version The current **default** constraint is `"^8.19.0 || ^9.1.0"`. This is set in the **root** `manifest.yml` only -- data stream manifests must NOT set their own `conditions`. When an integration uses features that require a newer agent (e.g., CEL functions introduced in v9.3.0), the constraint must be adjusted accordingly. For systematic version verification of CEL features, see the `review-integration` skill's version check references. **Justified exception — Federated Identity / `use_cloud_connectors`:** set `conditions.kibana.version` to `"^9.6.0"` and `conditions.agent.version` to `"^9.4.0"` (or higher). If the current Kibana constraint still covers a line that `^9.6.0` would drop, do **not** bump silently — escalate per **Floors and hygiene** in `input-configurations` -> `references/federated-identity-aws.md`. --- ## Variable scoping Fleet variables exist at four levels: 1. **Package level** -- `manifest.yml` top-level `vars:` 2. **Policy template level** -- `manifest.yml` under `policy_templates[].vars:` 3. **Input level** -- `manifest.yml` under `policy_templates[].inputs[].vars:` 4. **Data stream level** -- `data_stream/*/manifest.yml` under `streams[].vars:` A variable declared in an inner scope **must not** reuse the name of a variable in an outer scope. This is variable shadowing and is rejected by `elastic-package` validation. See `references/manifest-rules.md` -> **Variable shadowing** for full rules, examples, and common patterns. --- ## Manifest rules (brief) - **Every Handlebars `{{var}}` must be declared in a manifest** -- undeclared variables silently resolve to empty strings. Handlebars helpers (`{{#if}}`, `{{#each}}`, `{{#unless}}`, `{{#contains}}`) and built-in variables (`{{data_stream.type}}`, `{{data_stream.dataset}}`, `{{data_stream.namespace}}`, `{{output}}`) are exempt. - **Routing rules require dynamic flags** -- when a data stream uses `routing_rules.yml`, the data stream manifest must declare `elasticsearch.dynamic_dataset: true` and `elasticsearch.dynamic_namespace: true`. - **Use proper YAML nesting, not dotted keys** -- `elasticsearch.dynamic_dataset` as a literal key name creates a single flat key, not a nested object. Use nested `elasticsearch:` -> `dynamic_dataset:` structure. - **A green lint does not prove an input exists** -- the input *name* is an unvalidated string everywhere it appears: `policy_templates[].inputs[].type` and the data stream's `streams[].input` in an integration package, `policy_templates[].input` in an input package. Do not confuse it with the enum-backed data stream `type`, which in an integration package is a different field with the same name. See `references/manifest-rules.md` -> **Input names are not validated**. See `references/manifest-rules.md` for complete rules, correct/incorrect examples, and the review checklist. --- ## Changelog schema `changelog.yml` is a version-grouped array; newer versions go on top: ```yaml - version: "1.2.0" changes: - description: Added example parsing for edge-case payloads. type: enhancement link: https://github.com/elastic/integrations/pull/12345 ``` Each entry requires `description`, `type`, and `link`. Valid types: `enhancement`, `bugfix`, `breaking-change`. ## Version bump rules - **patch** (`x.y.Z`): bug fixes and low-risk fixes - **minor** (`x.Y.z`): new content -- new data streams, new fields, new features - **major** (`X.y.z`): breaking changes -- field type changes or removals on existing integrations, ECS mapping conflicts, required config/auth changes that break existing policies, data stream restructuring, default behavior changes that alter collected or normalized data ### When a bump is NOT required Internal metadata-only changes that do not alter what ships to users need **no version bump and no changelog entry**: `owner.github` reassignment, CODEOWNERS updates, CI/dev-tooling files outside the built package. Reviewers must not flag the absence of a bump for such diffs. Related bump conventions from elastic/integrations practice (see `review-integration/references/repo-conventions.md` for the dated details): - `owner.type` changes ARE published package metadata -- **minor** bump. - Adding the top-level `group:` manifest field -- **patch** bump + changelog entry. - Bot-authored `requires:` dependency bumps arrive with their own patch bump and changelog entry; never ask a human to redo or justify them. - `kibana.version` constraint updates are NOT breaking changes. ### Changelog `type` calibration (for reviewers) Flag an entry's `type` only when the diff or the entry's own description shows an observable compatibility or behavior change: dropped stack support, dataset/field rename or removal, field type change, default-behavior change, policy-breaking config moves. Re-bucketing between `bugfix` and `enhancement`, or splitting/merging entries, is editorial judgment for the author -- not a review finding. ## Adding changelog entries Edit `changelog.yml` directly, or use `elastic-package changelog add` (see `elastic-package-cli` skill for command flags and `--next patch|minor|major` usage). ## Common changelog pitfalls - Adding the entry under the wrong version or not at the top - Missing or wrong `link` field -- the link must be the pull request URL of the PR that introduces the change (`https://github.com/elastic/integrations/pull/<n>`), not an issue URL. `elastic-package lint` only validates that the number is a positive integer and **rejects** `pull/0`; use a real PR number or `pull/99999` as a development placeholder and replace before merge. Review tooling recognizes placeholder shapes (a repeated digit such as `1` or `9999`, zeros, `99999`, `12345`) and CI fails any number other than the PR's own, so both keep flagging a placeholder until it is replaced -- that is expected pre-merge behavior, not noise - Bumping manifest/package version inconsistently with changelog intent - **Forgetting to swap the placeholder link back in** -- see below See `references/changelog-patterns.md` for detailed patterns, breaking-change checklist, and CI examples. ## Updating the changelog link after PR creation The changelog `link` field must point to the PR that introduces the change, but the real PR number is only known once a PR has actually been opened -- everything up to that point necessarily uses the `pull/99999` placeholder from the pitfall above. This step is easy to skip because it happens *after* the rest of the package work is done, outside the usual build/test loop. Once the PR exists on GitHub: 1. Get the real PR number (from `gh pr create` output or the PR URL). 2. In `changelog.yml`, replace every placeholder link (`https://github.com/elastic/integrations/pull/99999`) with `https://github.com/elastic/integrations/pull/<real-number>`. 3. Run `elastic-package lint` to confirm the link now validates. 4. Commit and push the update to the same PR branch -- the placeholder must not be present in the version that gets merged. --- ## Upstream: elastic/package-spec The [elastic/package-spec](https://github.com/elastic/package-spec) repository is the upstream authority for package structure, manifest schema, and validation rules. The `spec/changelog.yml` in that repo documents which features were added in each spec version. Key points from the package-spec versioning model: - Packages must specify `format_version` in root `manifest.yml` - A package at `format_version: x.y.z` must be valid against specs in the range `[x.y.z, X.0.0)` where `X = x + 1` - Patch versions may add stricter validations (e.g., 3.6.0 added pipeline tag and on_failure validation) - Minor versions add new feature support - Major versions are reserved for significant format changes See `references/format-version-features.md` for the curated feature-to-version table. ## Reference files | File | Contains | |------|----------| | `references/manifest-rules.md` | Full rules for format_version selection, variable shadowing, Handlebars variable declarations, routing rules, YAML structure, and severity-tagged review checklist | | `references/changelog-patterns.md` | Changelog entry patterns, semver rules, breaking-change checklist, CI examples | | `references/format-version-features.md` | Feature-to-version table sourced from elastic/package-spec, including recent spec additions | | `references/var-groups-and-provider-permissions.md` | Schema for `var_groups` and `provider_permissions`, floors, validators; handoff to Federated Identity procedure |
عرض على GitHub