Skip to main content

integrate-concept-forge

Graduate a concept-forge artifact into the vault as a network of notes — spine concept + card-grade satellites + person-note updates + sources propagation + provenance split + sibling-cluster auto-offer. Use when the user says to integrate a concept-forge artifact, graduate a forge, or close out a forging session.

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
emcodeio/weave
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٣ يونيو ٢٠٢٦ في ٢١:٣٤
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
٢
التفرعات
١

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

مستكشف الملفات
3 ملفات

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
integrate-concept-forge
description
Graduate a concept-forge artifact into the vault as a network of notes — spine concept + card-grade satellites + person-note updates + sources propagation + provenance split + sibling-cluster auto-offer. Use when the user says to integrate a concept-forge artifact, graduate a forge, or close out a forging session.
argument-hint
[forge-slug or path to Workbench/concept-forge/[slug].md]
# Integrate Concept-Forge: $ARGUMENTS Graduate a concept-forge artifact at `Workbench/concept-forge/[slug].md` into a network of permanent vault notes — spine concept + card-grade satellites + person-note touches + sources propagation + provenance split + auto-offered chain to `/integrate-concept-cluster` if a sibling workbench cluster exists. This is the **forge-specific** integration skill. For non-forge workbench items use `/integrate-workbench` (lightweight default). For workbench clusters use `/integrate-concept-cluster` (this skill auto-offers the chain at Step 11). ## Reference rules and global constraints Load: `concept-craft` (concept card schema, anti-sycophancy/refinement-addiction guardrails, "tool is not truth"), `concept-forge-artifact-format` (specification of the workbench file format being parsed — frontmatter, body sections, templates), `workbench` (graduation conventions), `operating-principles` (proactive linking checklist), `vault-conventions` (atomic-note discipline + collection-note exception, frontmatter conventions, 7-folder structure). **Global constraints:** - **Plan-before-execute** — Never modify vault state until user confirms each phase. Show the plan, wait for approval, then execute. - **Per-item user gating** — Heuristics propose; user disposes. Always. - **Tool is not truth** — When the schema or heuristic doesn't fit, the schema is wrong, not the content. Honor user override always. - **Self-similarity check** — The heuristics introduce structure. Don't let structure force decomposition where coherence wants preservation. ## Dynamic Context ### Forge artifact preview !`obsidian read path="Workbench/concept-forge/$ARGUMENTS.md" vault="{{VAULT_NAME}}" 2>/dev/null | head -60 || echo "(forge artifact not at Workbench/concept-forge/$ARGUMENTS.md — try resolving slug in Step 1)"` ### Sibling cluster preview !`ls -la "Workbench/$ARGUMENTS/" 2>/dev/null || echo "(no direct sibling cluster at Workbench/$ARGUMENTS/)"` --- ## Step 1: Locate and validate the forge artifact Parse `$ARGUMENTS`: - If a path: read directly via `obsidian read path=...`. - If a slug: resolve to `Workbench/concept-forge/[slug].md`. - If ambiguous or empty: search via `obsidian search query="path:Workbench/concept-forge/ $ARGUMENTS"` and ask which to integrate. Read the full file. Verify frontmatter `status: ready`. If `status: drafting` or `paused`, confirm: "This forge is `[status]` — proceed with integration?" ## Step 2: Detect binding-argument scaffold Aggressive decomposition requires a binding summary in the spine that holds structure together after extraction. Scan `## Concept` for a section named like: - "The Argument, Condensed" - "The Core Argument" - "Summary" - "The Move(s)" - Or content that functions as a numbered binding-summary at the start of `## Concept` **If absent**, warn: > No binding-argument scaffold detected. Aggressive extraction risks fragmenting the concept into a list of pointers without binding structure. Options: > (a) Pause; write a binding summary first (recommended) — exit skill, user edits forge, re-runs. > (b) Conservative extraction — only the 1-2 strongest satellites. > (c) Proceed aggressive anyway (not recommended). Wait for user choice. If (a): exit. If (b): note conservative mode for Step 3. If (c): proceed. ## Step 3: Decomposition proposal — PLAN, do not execute Apply the card-grade heuristic from `references/card-grade-heuristic.md` to each subsection of `## Concept`. **Read that reference file before scoring.** It contains the 4-criterion rubric, the threshold rule (2+ checks → satellite candidate), the destination-hint logic (evergreen vs scoped), and worked-example calibration. For each candidate: compute the score, classify destination (evergreen / scoped / mixed), and group by kind: - Vocabulary moves - Strategic frames - Thought experiments / lenses - Deployable principles Present grouped proposal with per-candidate score visible: > **Group 1: Deployable principles (3 candidates)** > — Activation Threshold (4/4, evergreen) > — Friction Stacking (3/4, evergreen) > — On-Ramp (3/4, evergreen) > Accept all? Some? Skip? > > **Group 2: Strategic frames (1 candidate)** ... User accepts/skips by group with granular per-item override. **Do not proceed until user confirms.** If conservative mode (Step 2 fallback), propose only the top 1-2 highest-scoring candidates. ## Step 4: Spine-preservation check Build the post-extraction spine outline from accepted satellites in Step 3. Show the user the spine as it will look after extraction: > Spine after extraction: > # [Forge Title] > ## Core Insight — preserved > ## The Argument, Condensed — preserved with cross-refs to [[Satellite 1]], [[Satellite 2]] ... > ## Purpose Served / Anti-Scope / Nebulosity Type — preserved > ## Counterarguments & Responses — preserved > ## Satellites — list of wikilinks > > Concur, or pull anything back into the spine? User can pull items back into the spine (extraction skipped for those items; content stays inline). **Do not proceed until user confirms.** ## Step 5: Person-note phase Aggregate verbatim quotes + contributions per person across `## Concept` and `## Session Log`. Use grep / obsidian search across the forge artifact to find every quote attribution and ratification marker. For each person, present a per-person gate: > **[Person Name]** has N contributions to this forge: > 1. [contribution one] (date / context) > 2. [contribution two] (date / context) > ... > > Add all N to `References/[Person Name].md`? Some? Skip? If person note doesn't exist, propose creation using the person template (search `Templates/` for the canonical person template). User accepts/amends per person. **Do not proceed until user confirms each person.** ## Step 6: Sources phase Count sources in `## Sources & References`. Group by thematic clusters (subsection headers in that section). **Heuristic**: 8+ total sources OR sources span 3+ thematic clusters → propose collection note at `Notes/[Topic] Reading List.md` (intentional anti-atomic exception per `vault-conventions`). Else inline in spine's Sources section. For collection-note proposal, draft a one-line description and propose category note. User confirms/amends. **Do not proceed until user confirms.** ## Step 7: Auto-split provenance (no user gate) Move `## Session Log` content from forge artifact to a new `References/Forge History — [forge-name].md`. If `## Spawn Candidates` exists in the forge artifact (any status), include it in the same Forge History split — same provenance shape. Spawn decisions are part of the forge's design rationale and belong in the historical record, not in active retrieval. Active spawned forges retain their links via `## Cross-links` (which propagate to the spine concept note via Step 10). ```yaml --- categories: ["[[Forge History]]"] areas: [<inherited from forge>] status: completed tags: [forge-history] created: <today> source: "[[Workbench/concept-forge/[forge-name]]]" --- # Forge History: [forge-name] ## Session Log [Session log content verbatim, newest first] ## Spawn Candidates [Spawn candidates content verbatim — only if the section existed in the source] ``` The spine note (built in Step 8) keeps a footer pointer: `**Forge history**: [[Forge History — [name]]]`. This step has no user gate — it's a settled default per design. ## Step 8: Build the spine concept note From the (now-thinner) `## Concept` block — the spine after Step 4 confirmation — draft the spine note. Reference `references/card-schema.md` for the Chapman card schema and per-field guidance, especially the **Spine note structure** section at the end. Use Edit tool for safe placement (never `obsidian create overwrite`). Apply the full proactive linking checklist from `operating-principles.md`: 1. Set `categories` (typically `[[Concepts]]` or `[[Evergreen]]`; ask user if ambiguous). 2. Set `areas` (inherit from forge frontmatter). 3. Set `status: active`. 4. Verify `tags`; ensure `created` is set. 5. Search vault for related notes (QMD `vec` query with intent + obsidian search for keywords); add wikilinks where meaningful. 6. Verify category note exists; offer to create if missing. Place at `Notes/[Forge Title].md`. Add the forge-history footer pointer. ## Step 9: Build satellite notes For each accepted satellite from Step 3, draft a Chapman card note. **Read `references/card-schema.md` first** for per-field guidance; that file documents how to source each field from the forge subsection. For each satellite: 1. Draft using the Chapman card schema (Core Insight; Purpose Served; Anti-Scope; Nebulosity Type; The Insight Unpacked; Bounds & Edges; Analogies & Connections; Prior Art; Counterarguments & Responses; Revision Conditions; Open Questions). Fields may be blank where the forge content didn't develop them. 2. Source content from the corresponding subsection of the forge's `## Concept`. Pull verbatim quotes; cite sources from `## Sources & References` where they're cited there. 3. Apply proactive linking checklist (categories per Step 3 destination; areas inherited; related notes searched). 4. Route to destination — evergreen → `Notes/[Satellite Title].md` with `categories: ["[[Concepts]]"]` or `["[[Evergreen]]"]`; scoped → `Notes/[Satellite Title].md` with project link in body. 5. Cross-link: each satellite links back to the spine; relevant sibling satellites link to each other. ## Step 10: Cross-link propagation Search the vault for related concept notes that should reference the new vocabulary. Use QMD: `mcp__qmd__query` with: - `searches`: `[{type:'vec', query:'[satellite name] OR [spine concept name]'}]` - `intent`: "finding existing concept notes that should reference [new vocabulary] from this forge" Present matches: > Related notes that may benefit from updating: > - `[[Existing Concept Note]]` — score 0.85 — likely needs reference to [[Activation Threshold]] > - `[[Other Note]]` — score 0.72 — likely needs reference to [[Friction Stacking]] > > Update these? Per-note gates. For accepted updates, propose the specific edit (typically a wikilink + one-sentence context). User accepts/skips per note. **Do not proceed until user confirms each.** ## Step 11: Sibling-cluster auto-offer Check for adjacent workbench cluster: - `Workbench/[Forge Title]/` — direct subdirectory - `Workbench/[adjacent name]/` — semantically related workbench subdirectory referenced in the forge body If detected: > Cluster detected at `[path]` (N files). Run `/integrate-concept-cluster` now? It will receive the satellite-decision manifest from this run as context. > (a) Yes, run now — chain in same session. > (b) Later — I'll run `/integrate-concept-cluster` standalone. If (a): invoke `/integrate-concept-cluster` with satellite-decision manifest passed through (which content was absorbed into which satellite, so cluster triage can reference it). If (b) or no cluster detected: skip. ## Step 12: Leave the forge artifact in place **Do NOT** move, archive, or delete the forge artifact. The artifact remains at `Workbench/concept-forge/[slug].md` after integration. User direction: artifact still serves as design rationale during sibling skill development; user may process it later (potentially via this skill on itself as a self-test once both integration skills are stable). Surface a one-line note: "Forge artifact left in place at `Workbench/concept-forge/[slug].md` — process later when ready." ## Step 13: Commit and push ```bash cd "{{VAULT_PATH}}" git add <new spine note> <satellite notes> <person-note updates> <forge-history sibling> <collection note if any> <related-concept updates> git commit -m "Integrate concept-forge: [forge-name]" git push ``` Use specific file adds, not `git add -A`. Forge artifact stays in workbench (untouched), so it's not in the commit. ## Edge Cases - **Forge `status: drafting` or `paused`** — Confirm before proceeding; the artifact may not be ready. - **No satellite candidates** (all subsections score <2/4) — Skip Steps 3-4. Single-concept integration: just the spine note. Run Steps 5-13. - **No binding-argument scaffold + user picks (b)** — Conservative extraction: top 1-2 strongest candidates only. - **Cluster-only graduation needed** — User wants to integrate cluster but not concept yet. Direct them to `/integrate-concept-cluster` standalone; exit this skill. - **User aborts mid-flow** — No commits made; nothing on disk has changed. Confirm: "Aborting. Forge artifact and vault unchanged. Re-run when ready." - **Person already has a note + new contributions** — Read existing note; append new contributions section dated by forge graduation; preserve existing content. - **Satellite name collides with existing note** — Prompt: "Existing `[[Note Name]]` found. Merge into existing, rename satellite, or skip?" ## Anti-pattern reminders - **Never silently mutate vault state.** Every phase shows the plan; user confirms; then execute. - **Never collapse user gating into batch-of-one.** Group items, but always allow granular per-item override. - **Never force decomposition where coherence wants preservation.** If the user says "leave it in spine," honor it absolutely. - **Never invent verbatim quotes.** Person-note contributions cite the artifact's actual quotes — copy verbatim, attribute by date. - **Honor "tool is not truth"** (`concept-craft`). When the heuristic or schema doesn't fit, the heuristic is wrong, not the content.
عرض على GitHub