currency-audit

name	currency-audit
description	Comprehensive brain file review — external freshness, internal consistency, semantic accuracy — stamp only after full assessment
lastReviewed	2026-05-26T00:00:00.000Z

Currency Audit

Full assessment: external freshness + internal consistency + semantic accuracy. Stamp only when all pass.

brain-qa.cjs checks the date mechanically (the lastReviewed field). This skill defines the full review that earns that date. A re-stamp means both "content matches external reality" AND "content is internally consistent."

---

Critical Thinking Discipline

Every audit item must pass through critical thinking — not just mechanical verification. Apply these disciplines throughout:

Discipline	Application to Currency Audit
Alternative hypotheses	"This API exists" isn't enough — is the usage correct? Could the documented pattern be outdated even if the API isn't?
Missing data	What's NOT in the file that should be? Missing caveats, undocumented prerequisites, absent error handling?
Evidence quality	Is the file's advice based on official docs, or a single blog post from 2021?
Self-report skepticism	"Best practice" claims — verified against what source? "Works on current versions" — actually tested?
Bias detection	Anchoring on the file's current content. Challenge: would you write this the same way from scratch today?
Falsifiability	What would prove this advice wrong? If nothing could, the claim may be unfalsifiable hand-waving
Materiality gate	If this item were stale, would it cause real harm? Prioritize fixes that affect decisions over cosmetic accuracy

The key question at every checklist item: "Am I verifying this is correct, or am I assuming it's correct because it looks plausible?"

---

When to Use

• brain-qa shows files with expired or missing lastReviewed dates
• Before a release that ships brain files to heirs
• On a scheduled cadence (target: full audit every 90 days)
• After a major external change (new API version, deprecated pattern, VS Code update)

---

Quick Reference

Step	Action	Outcome
Triage	Run node scripts/brain-qa.cjs, read the stale-file output	Ordered work list
Research	Check latest docs, changelogs, releases for the file's domain	Delta list
Compare	Diff current content against latest practices	Stale advice identified
Audit	Check terminology, cross-references, claims, process logic	Internal consistency verified
Update	Fix stale content, wrong terms, broken references, contradictions	Full assessment complete
Stamp	Set lastReviewed: YYYY-MM-DD to today in frontmatter	Pass restored
Verify	Re-run brain-qa, confirm file passes	Clean output

---

Audit Process

1. Triage

Run brain-qa and read the stale-file output:

node scripts/brain-qa.cjs

brain-qa surfaces files whose lastReviewed exceeds the 180/365-day thresholds (warn/fail). Work the failures first, then the warnings, oldest first.

Batch size: 10-15 files per session. Larger batches cause quality drift.

2. Per-File Review Checklist

For each file, work through this checklist:

Frontmatter Check

• lastReviewed field exists and is a valid YYYY-MM-DD date
• description accurately reflects current content (not stale summary)
• For instructions: applyTo patterns still match the intended activation scope
• No dropped legacy fields present (type, application, tier, currency, inheritance, lifecycle) — see scripts/brain-qa.cjs for the canonical drop list

Content Freshness Check

• API references: Do referenced APIs still exist? Check for deprecations, renamed methods, new parameters
• Version numbers: Are pinned versions still current? (Node.js, VS Code API, Azure SDKs, etc.)
• URL links: Do referenced URLs still resolve? Are they the canonical location?
• Best practices: Has the community consensus changed? Check official docs, changelogs
• Tool availability: Are referenced CLI tools, extensions, or services still available?
• Code examples: Do code snippets still compile/run against current versions?

Semantic Consistency Check

• Terminology: File uses current terms, not deprecated synonyms (e.g., "skills" not "DK files", "skills/" not "domain-knowledge/")
• Claims match reality: Do documented features, commands, or capabilities actually exist in code?
• Cross-references: Links to other skills, agents, instructions, or files are correct and targets exist
• No contradictions: File doesn't conflict with related files covering the same topic
• Process logic: If the file documents a workflow, each step's prerequisites exist and outputs are real
• Architecture alignment: Any structural claims (counts, relationships, directory layouts) match current state

Structural Check

• No token waste: Remove Mermaid diagrams in non-teaching skills, redundant examples, excessive prose
• Progressive disclosure: Most important info first, advanced topics later
• Actionable content: Every section helps the LLM produce better output

3. Update and Stamp

Stamp only after ALL checklist sections pass — frontmatter, freshness, semantic consistency, and structural. A partial review does not earn a date stamp.

1. Make all content fixes (freshness + semantic + structural)
2. Update lastReviewed: YYYY-MM-DD in frontmatter to today's date
3. If the file's description changed meaning, update it

4. Verify

Re-run brain-qa to confirm the file now passes:

node scripts/brain-qa.cjs --stdout | grep "filename"
# PowerShell: node scripts/brain-qa.cjs --stdout | Select-String "filename"

---

Type-Specific Guidance

Skills

Check	What to Verify
Domain accuracy	Does the skill reflect current state of its domain?
Trifecta link	If workflow skill, does matching .instructions.md exist and align?
Reference files	Are references/ or scripts/ subdirectories still accurate?
Examples	Do code examples work with current tool versions?

Instructions

Check	What to Verify
Routing accuracy	Does applyTo glob match when this instruction should load?
Skill reference	If instruction references a skill, is the skill still current?
Rule validity	Are the rules still correct given current tooling?

Agents

Check	What to Verify
Model availability	Is the specified model still available and appropriate?
Tool references	Do referenced tools still exist in the extension?
Handoff targets	Do handoff agent names match actual agent files?

Prompts

Check	What to Verify
Agent reference	Does the agent field point to an existing agent?
Workflow steps	Are the prompted steps still valid for current tools?

Muscles

Check	What to Verify
Runtime compatibility	Does the script run without errors on current Node.js?
Dependencies	Are @requires dependencies still available?
Output format	Does the output match what consumers expect?
Dead code	Variables computed but never stored/used? Branches that can never match? Fields extracted but never displayed?

---

Batch Audit Workflow

For auditing many files efficiently:

1. Sort by category: Group files by domain (Azure, VS Code, testing, etc.) so research carries across files
2. Research once per domain: Check the domain's latest changelog/release notes once, apply to all files in that domain
3. Parallel reads: Read 5-6 files at once, note which need changes, then edit in sequence
4. Stamp in bulk: After verifying all changes, stamp dates. Use brain-qa to confirm all pass

---

Common Findings

Finding	Fix
Deprecated API method	Replace with current equivalent, cite migration guide
Stale version pin	Update to current stable version
Dead URL	Find new canonical URL or remove reference
Outdated best practice	Revise to current recommendation with rationale
Redundant Mermaid diagram	Replace with concise prose description
Missing lastReviewed field	Add field with today's date after completing review
Legacy frontmatter field (tier, currency, type, application, inheritance, lifecycle)	Drop it; see scripts/cleanup-frontmatter.cjs for the canonical drop list

---

Stale File Decision Table (AC2)

When a file's currency stamp is expired or missing, decide before acting:

Condition	Content Changed?	Action	Stamp?
Stamp expired, content still accurate	No	Re-stamp unchanged	Yes — review confirmed validity
Stamp expired, minor drift (terminology, links)	Yes — minor	Edit then re-stamp	Yes — after fixes land
Stamp expired, material staleness (deprecated APIs, wrong patterns)	Yes — major	Full rewrite of stale sections, then stamp	Yes — after full review
Stamp missing, file is active and current	N/A	Add stamp with today's date	Yes — review confirms currency
Stamp expired, file covers a dead domain (sunset API, retired tool)	N/A	Add a ## Deprecated section + docs/deprecations.md row + supersededBy link if a successor exists	No — deprecated files don't get stamped
Stamp expired, file is historical record (plan, ADR, postmortem)	N/A	Re-stamp with long reviewEvery (or exempt via doc-hygiene convention)	Yes — stamp means "confirmed intentionally historical"
Stamp expired, file documents an upstream-dependent capability (SDK, MCP server, external API)	Check upstream	Research latest upstream docs before deciding; record the pinned upstream version in the file body	Only after upstream verification

Rule: Never re-stamp without reviewing. A stamp is an attestation, not a date bump.

Related Skills

• doc-hygiene — Anti-drift rules for living documents
• skill-review — Five-gate audit (Gate 5 Currency & Coherence is the semantic companion to this skill's mechanical re-stamp)

Would Revise If

Revisit this skill by 2026-08-26 (90 days) or sooner if any of the following fires:

• Files stamped through this audit are flagged later by self-audit or coherence sweeps as carrying stale content the audit should have caught — ≥3 occurrences in a quarter
• Re-stamps without content change recur ≥3 times for the same file in a quarter (rubber-stamp pattern)
• Decisions on equivalent Stale File Decision Table entries diverge across audits ≥2 times in a quarter (decision table too soft)
• brain-qa.cjs changes the lastReviewed threshold defaults (currently 180-day warn / 365-day fail) — re-tune the 90-day audit cadence accordingly

Track these in docs/ledgers/curation-log.md tagged [CURRENCY-AUDIT-DRIFT].