Skip to main content

workflow-data-pre-modelling-checklist

WHAT: Composite quality gate that aggregates the outputs of outlier detection, unit reconciliation, and lineage tracking into a single pass/fail checklist before a dataset is consumed by a financial model. Routes to cfa-chief-analyst for data-quality sign-off. WHEN: Invoke as the final step before a cleaned dataset enters any modelling workflow (DCF, LBO, three-statement, comps, attribution). Should be run after workflow-data-outlier-detection, workflow-data-unit-reconciliation, and workflow-data-lineage-tracking have all been applied.

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
fall-development-rob/corp_finance
آخر نشاط في المصدر
١١ مايو ٢٠٢٦ في ١٤:١٠
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
٨
التفرعات
٢

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
workflow-data-pre-modelling-checklist
description
WHAT: Composite quality gate that aggregates the outputs of outlier detection, unit reconciliation, and lineage tracking into a single pass/fail checklist before a dataset is consumed by a financial model. Routes to cfa-chief-analyst for data-quality sign-off. WHEN: Invoke as the final step before a cleaned dataset enters any modelling workflow (DCF, LBO, three-statement, comps, attribution). Should be run after workflow-data-outlier-detection, workflow-data-unit-reconciliation, and workflow-data-lineage-tracking have all been applied.
# Pre-Modelling Data Quality Checklist ## What this skill covers A terminal quality gate that aggregates the outputs of the three upstream data hygiene skills into a single checklist and produces a pass/fail verdict. When this checklist passes, the dataset is cleared for modelling. When it fails, the checklist identifies which dimension requires remediation and routes back to the appropriate upstream skill. ## Inputs - Cleaned dataset with `lineage` and `review_flag` columns populated - Lineage manifest and sign-off block from `workflow-data-lineage-tracking` - Flag summary table from `workflow-data-outlier-detection` - Conversion log and frequency alignment record from `workflow-data-unit-reconciliation` ## Workflow ### Step 1 — Structural profile Confirm the dataset scope matches expectations: - Row count and column count match what was ingested - Target date range is complete (no silent gaps in the time series) - All mandatory columns are present (as defined by the downstream model's input schema) ### Step 2 — Unit and sign check Verify the unit reconciliation output: - [ ] All columns are in the target unit ($M, %, bps — per model convention) - [ ] No column has a residual scale anomaly (validated via `variance_analysis` post-conversion) - [ ] Sign conventions are uniform and match model convention - [ ] Frequency is uniform across all series at the target frequency - [ ] No silent mixed currencies in the output dataset - [ ] Stub periods are labelled and modelling treatment is documented ### Step 3 — Outlier disposition check Verify the outlier detection output: - [ ] All `review_flag` entries have been reviewed by the analyst (no open flags) - [ ] Each flag has a recorded disposition: retain / exclude / winsorise / investigate - [ ] No flagged value has been silently deleted (deletions require explicit approval) - [ ] `factor_model` or `rolling_forecast` residual flags are resolved if raised ### Step 4 — Lineage completeness check Verify the lineage tracking output: - [ ] Every cell in the dataset has a non-empty `lineage` entry - [ ] Every destructive transformation has an `approval` record - [ ] Lineage manifest lists all source extracts with pull timestamps - [ ] Sign-off block is present and `Approved for modelling` is set to "yes" ### Step 5 — Cross-source consistency When the dataset merges multiple sources, verify: - Call `working_capital` to sanity-check DSO/DIO/DPO consistency across cleaned periods - Verify that the same line item from two sources (e.g., FMP revenue vs EDGAR revenue) agrees within a rounding tolerance - Flag any residual discrepancy >0.1% as unresolved (requires analyst review before pass) ### Step 6 — Verdict and routing | All checks pass | Dataset is cleared. Produce the sign-off summary and pass to the downstream model. | |-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Unit/sign failure | Route to `workflow-data-unit-reconciliation` for remediation. | | Open outlier flags | Route to `workflow-data-outlier-detection` for analyst review. | | Lineage incomplete | Route to `workflow-data-lineage-tracking` to complete provenance annotation. | | Cross-source mismatch | Escalate to `cfa-chief-analyst` for resolution. | ## Output format 1. **Checklist table** — one row per check, with pass/fail status and remediation action if failed 2. **Verdict block** — PASS or FAIL with list of failing dimensions 3. **Model-ready dataset** — the cleaned dataset with sign-off block, ready for consumption ``` DATA QUALITY SIGN-OFF --------------------- Dataset: [name / description] Date: [ISO date] Source extracts: [list] Unit convention: $M (1dp) | Frequency: Annual | Currency: USD Outstanding flags: 0 Approved for modelling: YES Signed: cfa-chief-analyst ``` ## Quality gates - [ ] All six unit/sign checks pass before proceeding - [ ] Zero open `review_flag` entries in the outlier log - [ ] Lineage sign-off block present and marked "yes" - [ ] Cross-source discrepancies resolved within tolerance - [ ] Verdict explicitly stated as PASS or FAIL — not "mostly clean" ## Related skills - `workflow-data-outlier-detection` — upstream; provides the outlier flag table consumed in Step 3 - `workflow-data-unit-reconciliation` — upstream; provides the conversion log consumed in Step 2 - `workflow-data-lineage-tracking` — upstream; provides the lineage manifest consumed in Step 4
عرض على GitHub