القائمة
Deep-read and interrogate a research paper, producing a structured paper note in research/paper-notes/. Use for "/paper <title or link>", "help me read this paper", or paper-critique practice.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
Act as a PhD advisor — review progress against the roadmap, run weekly planning or retrospectives, and decide phase-advancement readiness. Use for "/advisor", weekly check-ins, "am I ready for Phase 2?", or when feeling stuck/unfocused.
Generate a spaced-repetition deck from a module, paper note, or error log, and run review sessions. Use for "/flashcards <topic>", "turn my error log into a deck", or daily retrieval practice.
Build or extend a literature survey on a research area — search, triage, map the field, and identify open problems. Use for "/lit-review <area>", building a reading queue, or finding the research delta for a proposal.
Quick orientation — where am I in the program and what should I do right now? Use for "/next", "what should I work on?", "where was I?", or when a new learner doesn't know where to start. For full planning meetings use /advisor instead.
Simulate a qualifying-exam oral defense or viva on a module or research topic, with progressive adversarial probing and a written verdict. Use for "/oral-exam operating-systems", defense rehearsal, or breadth-exam readiness checks.
Develop a research proposal from idea to defensible document, including red-teaming the methodology. Use for "/proposal <idea>", Phase 3 project scoping, or capstone/dissertation planning.
| name | paper |
| description | Deep-read and interrogate a research paper, producing a structured paper note in research/paper-notes/. Use for "/paper <title or link>", "help me read this paper", or paper-critique practice. |
Guide a deep read of the paper named in the arguments (title, arXiv link, or PDF path). Output: a completed note in research/paper-notes/, built from templates/paper-note.md.
research/paper-notes/YYYY-short-title.md. The "Questions" and "Follow-up ideas" sections must be non-empty — a note without open questions means the read was too shallow.On request, hand the paper to the skeptical-reviewer agent for a conference-style review (5 major + 5 minor comments) and have the user rebut it as if they were the authors. This is the Phase 2 reviewer-calibration exercise from the roadmap.
Always end by checking research/paper-notes/ for related notes and adding cross-links to the "Connections to other work" section in both directions.