Skip to main content

plan-pipeline

Orchestrates the complete planning pipeline: product direction (ceo-review) -> architecture (eng-review) -> implementation plan (start) -> validation (validate) -> execution (execute). Run stages individually or let the orchestrator coordinate the full flow.

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-ultimate-guide
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٣٠ سبتمبر ٢٠٢٦ في ١٣:٤١
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
٦٬٢٥٠
التفرعات
٨١٤

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

مستكشف الملفات
6 ملفات

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
plan-pipeline
description
Orchestrates the complete planning pipeline: product direction (ceo-review) -> architecture (eng-review) -> implementation plan (start) -> validation (validate) -> execution (execute). Run stages individually or let the orchestrator coordinate the full flow.
allowed-tools
Read Write Bash Task
effort
high
# Plan pipeline orchestrator Orchestrates the complete plan-to-execution pipeline. Can run the full pipeline or a single isolated stage. ## Stages | Stage | Skill | Purpose | |-------|-------|---------| | 1 | `/plan-pipeline:ceo-review` | Challenge the brief, lock product direction | | 2 | `/plan-pipeline:eng-review` | Lock architecture, diagrams, and test matrix | | 3 | `/plan-pipeline:start` | 5-phase planning: PRD, research, ADRs, task list | | 4 | `/plan-pipeline:validate` | 2-layer validation before any code is written | | 5 | `/plan-pipeline:execute` | Worktree isolation, parallel agents, quality gate, PR | ## Usage ``` /plan-pipeline # full pipeline, asks for context /plan-pipeline --from=start # skip gates, start from planning phase /plan-pipeline --from=validate # validate an existing plan /plan-pipeline --from=execute # execute a validated plan ``` ## When to use each stage **ceo-review**: use before any significant feature when the direction is not locked. Especially valuable when the request is specific (specificity signals collapsed solution space). **eng-review**: use after direction is locked. Required for features with async components, external dependencies, or multi-step flows. **start**: use for any non-trivial feature touching more than 2 files or involving architecture decisions. **validate**: always before execute. The cost of validation is negligible against the cost of discovering issues mid-execution. **execute**: after validate confirms all issues are resolved. ## Workflow 1. **Collect context**: what are we building, and what stage do we start from? 2. **ceo-review**: product direction gate (can be skipped with `--from=eng-review` or later) 3. **eng-review**: architecture gate (can be skipped with `--from=start` or later) 4. **CHECKPOINT**: ask user to confirm direction and architecture before planning 5. **start**: run 5-phase planning, produce `docs/plans/plan-{name}.md` 6. **CHECKPOINT**: present plan for review before validation 7. **validate**: 2-layer validation (structural + specialist agents) 8. **execute**: worktree isolation -> parallel agents -> quality gate -> PR ## Dependency graph ``` ceo-review | eng-review | start | validate | execute ``` ## Notes Each stage writes its output to disk before the next stage begins. If the pipeline is interrupted, resume with `--from=<stage>` using the correct stage name. All decisions are recorded in `docs/plans/plan-{name}.md` and the corresponding ADRs in `docs/adr/`.
عرض على GitHub