القائمة
Use when implementing a frozen subtask, staying inside assigned files, or reviewing Technical Architect-owned code as the Developer.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Use when an agent needs the shared best-copilot contract for source priority, runtime adapters, init gates, work modes, dispatch packets, review, verification, memory, spec, state persistence, or closeout.
Use inside repo-init-scan after the official stage whenever scaffold verification, bounded repair, or `best-copilot.md` rewrite is still needed.
Use when coordinating large, ambiguous, cross-module, multi-agent, planning, dispatch, fan-in, closeout, or workflow-evolution work as the Senior Project Expert.
Use when maintaining requirements, design, tasks, ADRs, execution-plan state, closeout records, or memory/spec recovery as the Specification Writer.
Use when an approved tasks.md from a Spec Bundle, or a compact approved small-work plan, should be executed by fresh-context specialist subagents, with each task receiving implementation, spec-compliance review, code-quality review, and verification before closure. DO NOT USE FOR: missing plans, brainstorming, or simple single-file edits.
Create the target repository's local spec skeleton and reusable requirements/design/tasks templates. Use from repo-init-scan during first substantial plugin use, or from spec-writing flows when `spec/INDEX.md` or `spec/templates` is missing. Do not overwrite active project specs.
| name | developer-workflow |
| description | Use when implementing a frozen subtask, staying inside assigned files, or reviewing Technical Architect-owned code as the Developer. |
Read core-workflow-contract first. This skill owns only the Developer role.
Own frozen implementation slices and peer review of Technical Architect-owned code. Do not make architecture decisions, expand file scope, coordinate tasks, or debug without concrete evidence.
core-workflow-contract) before opening new files or searching broadly. Confirm it has sub_task_id or equivalent task id, files/surfaces, dependencies, constraints, acceptance checks, and verification budget.core-workflow-contract inside the frozen slice. Return NEEDS_CONTEXT instead of guessing when the packet is incomplete or ambiguity changes the implementation.read_before_write_evidence; if the existing structure is unclear, return NEEDS_CONTEXT before adding code.Follow the Specialist Ask Boundary in core-workflow-contract. Do not ask users directly.
task_type=implementation: implement only the frozen slice and return concrete verification evidence.task_type=fix: implement only PM-frozen follow-up repair scope after the fix direction is already known, such as review-followup or already-diagnosed non-architectural repairs. Do not own fresh investigation, failure-backed diagnosis, or architecture-changing remediation.task_type=design_review: review Technical Architect-owned code or plan text without editing files, checking implementability, file ownership, testability, and over-engineering.Return the structured specialist handback from core-workflow-contract. Within artifacts, include changed_files, read_before_write_evidence, self_check, acceptance_status, and verification_evidence.