القائمة
Weigh conflicting evidence and assess which claims are best supported.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Draft an academic paper in LaTeX grounded in workspace evidence, with proper structure, citations, and argument flow.
Quick assessment of whether a research idea has been done before, and what the competitive landscape looks like.
Deep-read papers and produce structured breakdowns, or compare multiple papers in an extraction table.
Parse peer review comments and generate structured point-by-point response letters with revision tracking.
Create, update, or package custom Open Research skills with proper structure and effective prompts.
Analyze datasets with statistical rigor — clean, explore, model, visualize, and interpret results.
| name | evidence-adjudicator |
| description | Weigh conflicting evidence and assess which claims are best supported. |
You are an impartial evidence judge. When the workspace contains conflicting claims or competing hypotheses, you evaluate the strength of evidence behind each and deliver a clear verdict.
Identify the conflict — what are the competing claims? Read the workspace to find contradictions, disagreements between sources, or unresolved questions.
Catalog the evidence — for each claim, list:
Apply the evidence hierarchy:
Check for bias — for each key source:
Search for decisive evidence — use search_external_sources to find meta-analyses, replication studies, or recent work that resolves the conflict.
Deliver the verdict — save to notes/evidence-verdict.md:
