| name | dilemma-navigation-for-education-design |
| description | Identify and navigate genuine dilemmas in curriculum, school, or community contexts — tensions between competing goods that cannot be solved, only navigated. Produces a structured dilemma map with both poles named and both/and possibilities. |
| disable-model-invocation | false |
| user-invocable | true |
| effort | medium |
| skill_id | original-frameworks/dilemma-navigation-for-education-design |
| skill_name | Dilemma Navigation for Education Design |
| domain | original-frameworks |
| version | 1.0 |
| evidence_strength | emerging |
| evidence_sources | ["H3Uni Dilemma Thinking tutorial and Dilemma Resolution mapping guide (CC BY-SA 4.0, practitioner method)","Johnson, B. (1992). Polarity Management: Identifying and Managing Unsolvable Problems. HRD Press.","Hampden-Turner, C. (1990). Charting the Corporate Mind: From Dilemma to Strategy. Basil Blackwell."] |
| input_schema | {"required":[{"field":"tension_or_dilemma","type":"string","description":"Description of the tension — what two values, needs, or approaches seem to be in conflict"},{"field":"context","type":"string","description":"The curriculum, school, or community context in which this tension appears"}],"optional":[{"field":"value_a","type":"string","description":"Name for the first pole — the value or principle on one side"},{"field":"value_b","type":"string","description":"Name for the second pole — the value or principle on the other side"},{"field":"student_level","type":"string","description":"Year group or age range"},{"field":"related_systems_work","type":"string","description":"Insights from prior Three Horizons mapping or hexagon mapping that surfaced this dilemma"}]} |
| output_schema | {"type":"object","fields":[{"field":"dilemma_statement","type":"string","description":"A clear statement of the dilemma with both poles named as legitimate values"},{"field":"value_a_pole","type":"object","description":"Value A: what it offers, what it risks when over-emphasised, what it needs from Value B, what it can offer Value B"},{"field":"value_b_pole","type":"object","description":"Value B: what it offers, what it risks when over-emphasised, what it needs from Value A, what it can offer Value A"},{"field":"compromise_zone","type":"string","description":"The tempting middle-ground that appears to resolve the tension but fails both values"},{"field":"conflict_zone","type":"string","description":"Where the genuine pain, trade-off, or incompatibility is felt most sharply"},{"field":"both_and_possibilities","type":"array","description":"Ideas that honour both values simultaneously rather than trading one for the other"},{"field":"implementation_constraints","type":"array","description":"Real constraints on any integration idea — resource, authority, time, cultural, or structural"},{"field":"quality_gate_results","type":"object","description":"Results of structural quality checks on the dilemma map"}]} |
| chains_well_with | ["three-horizons-learning-transition-mapper","multi-perspective-decision-wheel","systems-awareness-iceberg","assessment-validity-checker","hexagon-complexity-mapper"] |
| teacher_time | 15 minutes |
| tags | ["h3uni","dilemma-navigation","values","both-and-thinking","original-framework","emerging-evidence","curriculum-design","ethics"] |