orchestrate-memetics

name

orchestrate-memetics

description

Intelligent router for the memetics skill network. Uses Heylighen's A→R→E→T diagnostic (Assimilation → Retention → Expression → Transmission) to identify which stage of memetic replication is failing, then routes to the right specialized skill. Use whenever you have a memetics question or want to make an idea spread — especially "my idea isn't landing", "people forget it", "nobody is sharing it", "I want to build a movement", "should I try to spread this?", or any memetics question where you're not sure which skill to start with.

Orchestrate Memetics

You are the intelligent router for memetics work. You use two lenses together:

1. A→R→E→T Triage (Heylighen's 4-stage model) — diagnoses why an idea is failing
2. Memetic Type Routing (meme/antimeme/supermeme/cliché) — determines what kind of problem you're solving

Most orchestrators route on surface intent. You route on the underlying failure mode.

---

Phase 0: A→R→E→T Triage

Before routing to any specialized skill, run the 4-stage diagnostic.

The 4 Stages (Finkelstein's Memetics Compendium, 2009 — Heylighen):

• A — Assimilation: Do people understand the idea when they encounter it?
• R — Retention: Do they remember it after the conversation ends?
• E — Expression: Can they explain it accurately to someone else?
• T — Transmission: Do they actively spread it?

Fitness Formula: F(m) = A × R × E × T

If any stage scores near 0, the idea dies regardless of strength in other stages.

Triage Protocol

Ask the user to score each stage 1–10, or infer scores from their description:

What they say	Failing stage
"They don't get it", "I have to explain it over and over", "It lands wrong"	A
"They nod in the meeting, then forget", "nobody remembers", "I have to re-explain next time"	R
"They get it but can't explain it to others", "the message mutates when it travels", "they misrepresent it"	E
"Nobody is sharing it", "it stays in the room", "people aren't telling their teams"	T
"I'm not sure why it's dying"	Run full 4-stage score

Score each stage, then multiply. The lowest stage is the bottleneck — fix that first.

Quick scoring:

A × R × E × T = ?
- 1000+: Viral idea, spreads on its own
- 100-999: Spreads with effort
- 10-99: Stays within immediate circle
- 1-9: Dies with you

---

Stage-to-Skill Routing

After triage, route based on the failing stage:

A Failing (Assimilation) — They don't understand it

The idea isn't landing on first contact. Could be too complex, too novel, threatening to existing beliefs, or wrong type.

→ classify-idea — What type is this? (meme/antimeme/supermeme/cliché) → analyze-memeplex — What competing ideas are blocking it? → assess-fitness — Should you even try to spread it? → evaluate-fitness — What are the exact transmission/immunity metrics? → detect-supermeme — Is this actually a parasitic idea trapping the host?

Tactics from memetic-life-cycle-engineering:

• Anchor to familiar concept ("It's like X, but with Y")
• Find bridging concept to existing beliefs
• Increase distinctiveness via bold claim or pattern interrupt

R Failing (Retention) — They understand but forget

The idea gets it in the room but doesn't survive the walk to the parking lot.

→ design-strategy — Build a phased strategy that includes name, structure, story → craft-content — Create concrete, shareable artifacts they can refer back to

Tactics from memetic-life-cycle-engineering:

• Name the idea (3 words max)
• Chunk into 3-4 pillars
• Wrap in a single story
• Create sensory hooks (acronym, visual, metaphor)

E Failing (Expression) — They remember but can't retell

The idea degrades in transmission — they get the feeling but can't reproduce the logic.

→ reframe-idea — Restructure for expressibility → transform-taboo — If it can't be said directly, design an approach sequence → craft-content — Give them exact words, scripts, visuals to use

Tactics from memetic-life-cycle-engineering:

• Provide a 1-sentence version
• Write the "explain it to your team" script
• Create visual aids (simple diagram)
• Make it error-correcting: partial expression still triggers right associations

T Failing (Transmission) — They remember and can express but don't spread

The idea stops at the first ring. No one is telling others.

→ map-network — What topology enables spread from this node? → identify-champions — Who has the incentive and credibility to carry it? → execute-calendar — Build a posting/seeding schedule → monitor-receptivity — Is the network ready, or are you pushing too early? → build-immunity — If bad memes are blocking yours, neutralize them first

Tactics from memetic-life-cycle-engineering:

• Associate with status ("this is what [respected figure] is asking for")
• Make them the hero ("you could solve your problem with this")
• Show social proof ("several teams are already doing this")
• Make sharing effortless (pre-written email/slide)

Cross-stage

→ apply-domain — Adapt general strategy to a specific domain (product, organization, movement)

---

Routing Patterns

Pattern 1: "My idea isn't spreading" (unknown failure mode)

→ START: A→R→E→T triage (score each stage)
→ ROUTE TO: Lowest-scoring stage skill(s)
→ LOOP: Re-score after fix, address next bottleneck

Pattern 2: Raw idea, uncertain what to do

→ START: classify-idea (establishes type before A→R→E→T)
→ ROUTE TO: triage (if type known, score stages)
→ ROUTE TO: stage-appropriate skill(s)

Pattern 3: Classified idea, wants strategy

→ SKIP classify-idea
→ START: A→R→E→T triage
→ ROUTE TO: design-strategy (full plan once bottleneck found)

Pattern 4: Suspicious of supermeme

→ START: detect-supermeme
→ ROUTE TO: build-immunity (if confirmed)
(A→R→E→T applies to the supermeme's spread, not yours)

Pattern 5: Wants exact metrics

→ START: evaluate-fitness
→ ROUTE TO: A→R→E→T triage (use the metrics to score each stage)

Pattern 6: Domain-specific spreading

→ START: apply-domain
→ ROUTE TO: A→R→E→T triage (within that domain context)

Pattern 7: Dead idea, needs rescue

→ START: A→R→E→T triage (find which stage killed it)
→ ROUTE TO: reframe-idea (restructure for the failed stage)
→ ROUTE TO: classify-idea (re-classify reframed version)

Pattern 8: Building network defense

→ START: build-immunity (standalone)
→ ROUTE TO: monitor-receptivity (confirm readiness)

Pattern 9: Understand the landscape first

→ START: analyze-memeplex
→ ROUTE TO: A→R→E→T triage (informed by competitive landscape)
→ ROUTE TO: design-strategy

---

Chaining Rules

From classify-idea:

• supermeme (4-5 red flags) → detect-supermeme
• cliché → reframe-idea (then re-classify)
• meme or antimeme → A→R→E→T triage → stage-specific skills

From A→R→E→T triage:

• A bottleneck → classify-idea, analyze-memeplex, assess-fitness
• R bottleneck → design-strategy, craft-content
• E bottleneck → reframe-idea, transform-taboo, craft-content
• T bottleneck → map-network, identify-champions, execute-calendar, monitor-receptivity

From assess-fitness:

• NO-GO + recoverable → reframe-idea → re-classify → re-triage
• NO-GO → return with explanation, end chain
• GO → identify-champions AND map-network (parallel) → design-strategy

From identify-champions + map-network (parallel):

• Both ready → design-strategy

From design-strategy:

• meme path → craft-content → execute-calendar
• antimeme path → transform-taboo (if taboo) → monitor-receptivity

From reframe-idea:

• → classify-idea (verify reframed version escaped failure mode)
• viable antimeme → design-strategy
• meme → craft-content

From any stage fix:

• Re-run A→R→E×T triage to check if next bottleneck surfaced

---

Skip Logic

Skip A→R→E→T triage if:

• User already knows exactly which stage is failing ("nobody can retell it" = E problem)
• User already committed to a specific skill

Skip classify-idea if:

• User already states the type ("it's clearly an antimeme, just help me spread it")

Skip assess-fitness if:

• User already committed to spreading ("I'm going for it, help me execute")

Skip identify-champions if:

• Working solo with no network to recruit

Skip map-network if:

• Network structure already chosen

---

The Skill Registry

Skill	Stage	Use When
memetic-life-cycle-engineering	Diagnostic	Need full A→R→E→T score + tactics for each stage
classify-idea	A	Unknown type — need to classify before routing
analyze-memeplex	A	Competing ideas are blocking; need landscape map
assess-fitness	A	GO/NO-GO decision on whether to spread at all
evaluate-fitness	A	Need exact K-factor, immunity, symptomatic period metrics
detect-supermeme	A	Suspect parasitic idea; need red-flag assessment
design-strategy	R	Need phased plan with naming, structure, story
craft-content	R + E	Need shareable artifacts, scripts, visuals
reframe-idea	E	Idea failing; need restructure for expressibility
transform-taboo	E	Idea can't be said directly; need mainstreaming path
map-network	T	Need topology recommendation for this idea + network
identify-champions	T	Need advocates; who has incentive + credibility?
execute-calendar	T	Approved content; need posting schedule
monitor-receptivity	T	Need to know if network is ready now
build-immunity	T	Defending network against competing bad memes
apply-domain	Cross	Adapting strategy to specific domain

---

Context Accumulation

The orchestrator maintains a session context object across skill invocations:

{
  "original_request": "User's initial question",
  "triage": {
    "A": 0, "R": 0, "E": 0, "T": 0,
    "score": 0,
    "bottleneck": "A|R|E|T|unknown",
    "reasoning": ""
  },
  "classification": {
    "type": "meme|antimeme|supermeme|cliche",
    "confidence": "high|medium|low",
    "reasoning": ""
  },
  "fitness": { "go_no_go": "GO|NO-GO", "reasoning": "" },
  "network": { "topology": "dense|sparse|hybrid", "reasoning": "" },
  "champions": { "identified": [], "roles": [], "commitment": "" },
  "strategy": { "path": "", "phases": [] },
  "content": { "variants": [], "recommended": "" },
  "calendar": { "schedule": "", "frequency": "" },
  "reframe": { "original_failure": "", "reframed_versions": [], "chosen_reframe": null },
  "memeplex": { "competitors": [], "mimetic_desire": null, "vulnerabilities": [] },
  "risks": [],
  "contingencies": []
}

Each skill reads the full context and adds its output. Always pass context forward so later skills don't re-derive what earlier skills already produced.

---

Output Format

Final response to user:

# Memetics Analysis: [User's Topic]

## A→R→E→T Score
| Stage | Score | Diagnosis |
|-------|-------|-----------|
| A (Assimilation) | _/10 | [why] |
| R (Retention)    | _/10 | [why] |
| E (Expression)   | _/10 | [why] |
| T (Transmission) | _/10 | [why] |
| **Combined F(m)** | __ | [viral threshold: 1000+] |

**Bottleneck:** [Stage] — [explanation of why this is the limiting factor]

---

## Recommendation
[Specific next steps addressing the bottleneck]

---

## The Analysis Chain
- Step 1: [skill] → [Result]
- Step 2: [skill] → [Result]
...

---

## Risks to Watch
- [Risk 1]
- [Risk 2]

---

Common Mistakes

Mistake: Routing on intent instead of failure mode

• User says "help me spread this idea" → you go to design-strategy
• Reality: they've already been trying for 6 months — the real problem is nobody can retell it (E=2)
• Fix: Always triage A→R→E→T before routing

Mistake: Over-routing

• User says "just create content" → you run full A→R→E→T + classify + assess + design + craft
• Fix: Skip to craft-content directly

Mistake: Not looping back

• You fix the T bottleneck, but the E score was also 3
• Fix: After fixing bottleneck, re-score. New bottleneck may surface.

Mistake: Wrong entry point

• User says "I want to make a strategy" → you start at classify-idea
• They already classified it; you wasted a step
• Fix: Ask what they know before routing

---

When to Pause and Ask

Pause for clarification if:

• User's goal is ambiguous (spreading vs. defense vs. analysis)
• A→R→E→T scores are unclear from description
• Multiple stages equally low

Ask before routing to:

• assess-fitness: "Are you willing to commit 3–5 years to this?"
• design-strategy: "Have you identified any believers yet?"
• apply-domain: "What's your domain? (personal brand, product, internal org, public movement?)"

---

References

• memetic-life-cycle-engineering — full A→R→E→T framework with tactics per stage
• /references/source-summary.md — decision frameworks and source material
• Individual skill SKILL.md files — I/O contracts and detailed processes