Skip to main content

litert-conversion-workflow

Convert a Hugging Face LLM or vision-language model checkpoint into a .litertlm bundle that runs on the LiteRT-LM runtime with verified quality - classify the architecture against known runtime walls, pick the recipe family (dense, reasoning, hybrid SSM, VLM), export, quantize, gate the result against the source model, and publish. Use when converting a new LLM or VLM to LiteRT-LM, when a converted bundle crashes on the first message or dies at engine creation, when a quantized model answers worse than its source, or when deciding whether a model is convertible at all.

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
google-ai-edge/litert-samples
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٧ أكتوبر ٢٠٢٦ في ٠٢:٤٦
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
٤٥٨
التفرعات
١٢٢

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

مستكشف الملفات
6 ملفات

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
litert-conversion-workflow
description
Convert a Hugging Face LLM or vision-language model checkpoint into a .litertlm bundle that runs on the LiteRT-LM runtime with verified quality - classify the architecture against known runtime walls, pick the recipe family (dense, reasoning, hybrid SSM, VLM), export, quantize, gate the result against the source model, and publish. Use when converting a new LLM or VLM to LiteRT-LM, when a converted bundle crashes on the first message or dies at engine creation, when a quantized model answers worse than its source, or when deciding whether a model is convertible at all.
# LiteRT-LM conversion workflow A conversion is done when three things hold, in this order: 1. the bundle loads and generates through the LiteRT-LM engine (not just the raw `.tflite` graphs), 2. **output quality is gated against the source model** — a floor gate plus a task-level parity check, not a smoke test, 3. it holds up on the deployment path it claims: the target backend, the target device, and multi-turn conversation. Each step can pass while the next one fails. A bundle that converts can die at engine creation; an engine that generates can be quantization garbage; a model that answers 8/8 single-turn can crash on message two. The gates exist because every one of these has happened. Scope: models producing a `.litertlm` bundle consumed by the LiteRT-LM engine (`pip install litert-lm`) — text LLMs and vision-language models (a VLM bundle is an LLM bundle plus two vision graphs; `references/vlm-conversion.md` covers the delta). Standalone/classic `.tflite` models go through the `gpu-clean-conversion` → `accuracy-safe-quantization` → `on-device-verification` lane; this skill is the LM sibling and reuses their discipline where it applies. ## Step 0: classify before you convert Look at `config.json` (`model_type`, `layer_types`, MoE fields, size) **before** running anything. Architecture decides everything downstream, and some structures die at a known point no recipe can route around. `references/architecture-walls.md` is the lookup table: structure → where it dies (export / load / engine / backend) → the error signature you'll see. Check it first; it turns a day of debugging into a table lookup. Then pick the lane in `references/recipe-selector.md`: plain dense decoders ride a standard export; hybrids (SSM / linear-attention / short-conv) need state-aware export plus executor metadata; reasoning models need template care; MoE and MLA are currently walls. ## Loop **1. Export with a minimal, extraction-safe template.** The single most common ship-killer is not math — it is the chat template. Export with `use_jinja_template=False` and a minimal ChatML-style template swapped in, so the bundle carries plain prefix/suffix markers and **no Jinja at all**. Vendor templates routinely call Python methods (`.get()`, `.startswith()`, `.strip()`) that the runtime's minijinja renderer does not implement — such a bundle imports fine and dies on the first message. Details, the multi-turn prefix contract, and the tokenizer traps that pair with this: `references/template-tokenizer-traps.md`. **2. Check the bundle before measuring anything.** ```bash python -m litert_lm_builder.litertlm_peek_main --litertlm_file model.litertlm ``` `prompt_templates`-only = safe. A `jinja_prompt_template` carrying Python-method calls = the first-message crasher. Also confirm the stop tokens and (for hybrids) the executor-metadata section are present. **3. Quantize on the LLM lane.** int8 dynamic is the safe default; int4 must be **blockwise** (block-32 quality, block-128 for ~4B / iPhone section limits) — channelwise int4 collapses decoders while still passing smoke tests. Conv/scan layers of hybrids stay float. The decision facts and the recipe mechanics: `references/recipe-selector.md` §Quantization, plus the `accuracy-safe-quantization` skill for the general ladder. **4. Gate quality — floor, parity, then structure.** Run the gate stack in `references/verification-gates.md`: - **8-question floor gate** on the engine (CPU, then the target backend). Catches collapse, never proves parity. - **Task parity** (e.g. GSM8K n≥100) against the source model, same prompt and extraction both sides. Reasoning models need max-tokens ≥ 2048 or int4 falsely looks degraded. - **First-token length sweep** — chat-templated prompt lengths are chunked by the engine's prefill planner, and state-carrying models corrupt at *specific lengths* while answering perfectly at others. - **Multi-turn** — single-turn evals structurally cannot catch template-contract violations that kill message two. **5. Gate on the target device.** Desktop GPU pass ≠ mobile GPU pass (different delegates, different compilers). Record device, backend, runtime version, and speeds next to the quality numbers — the `on-device-verification` skill's rules apply unchanged. **6. Publish behind the gate.** The upload step must mechanically refuse unless the quality report passed — a collapsed quant that reaches a public repo costs more than every hour the gates cost. Card conventions and the publish checklist: `references/verification-gates.md` §Publish. ## Symptom router | What you see | Where to look | |---|---| | Export raises in `torch.export` / tracing | `architecture-walls.md` — data-dependent guards (MoE gating, dynamic rope), dtype-in-constant-path traps | | Export OK, engine creation fails: `No KV cache inputs found` | Hybrid on a pre-0.15 runtime — runtime too old for the architecture | | Engine OK, generation dies: `NOT_FOUND ... missing some output TensorBuffers` | Hybrid bundle missing the executor-metadata section (`recipe-selector.md` §Hybrids) | | First message crashes: `unknown method: map has no method named get` | Vendor Jinja embedded in the bundle — re-export per Loop step 1 | | Output is fluent garbage / prompt seems ignored | Tokenizer packaging (`template-tokenizer-traps.md` §Tokenizer) | | Runtime crash: `Token id N is out of range` | Added special tokens dropped from the packaged tokenizer — same file, §Added tokens | | Stop token printed as literal text / model never stops | Stop-token metadata incomplete — §Stop tokens | | Answers fine at some prompt lengths, garbage/empty at others | Prefill-padding state corruption — run the length sweep, `verification-gates.md` | | Message two fails or quality drops mid-conversation | Template prefix contract violated — `template-tokenizer-traps.md` §Multi-turn | | int4 passes the 8-question gate but tanks the benchmark | The floor-gate trap — gate is a floor, parity is the verdict (`verification-gates.md`) | | Every build scores 8/8 and the gate never discriminates | Floor items are saturated — rebuild the gate from borderline cases (`verification-gates.md` §1) | | The converted model *beats* its source | Suspect the harness, not the recipe: a mis-prompted or mis-rendered reference (`verification-gates.md` §2, `vlm-conversion.md` §Gates) | | Scored numbers look plausible but wrong; generation is fine | The scoring-API traps — session reuse and `apply_prompt_template=True` (`verification-gates.md` §0) | | Quality flips only on one backend | 4-layer triage: torch → torch-control → engine-CPU → engine-GPU (`verification-gates.md` §Triage) | | GPU rejects the graph (`not fully delegated`, named op) | `architecture-walls.md` §Backend walls; classic-op rewrites live in `gpu-clean-conversion` | | Vision tower aborts export (`grid_thw`, `cu_seqlens` guards) | Dynamic-resolution tower — static rewrite (`vlm-conversion.md`) | | VLM bundle: "Failed to create conversation" | Structured prompt_templates missing from metadata (`vlm-conversion.md`) | | VLM engine creation fails on device naming GATHER_ND | Patch reorder in the vision tower — raster-order rewrite (`vlm-conversion.md`) | | VLM answers ignore the image / describe the wrong thing | Preprocessing contract (mean/std, NCHW) or embedder injection — gates in `vlm-conversion.md` | ## Watch for - **Pin and record the toolchain.** litert-torch / litert-converter / litert-lm-builder / ai-edge-quantizer / transformers versions decide what exports and what runs; several walls in the references are version-bounded facts. A conversion note without versions is not reproducible. - **The runtime moves under you.** A wall table entry is a dated fact, not a law — re-test walls on each runtime/converter release, in both directions: walls fall (blocked architectures start working) and regressions appear (bundles that ran stop running). Both have happened in the same release. - **Never diagnose quality without a control.** Run the same eval on the source model with the same prompt and extraction; a broken harness undermeasures everyone and reads as a conversion bug. - **The engine adds behavior the graph does not have** — start-token prepending, prefill chunking, cross-conversation caching. When engine output differs from a raw-graph replay, reproduce the engine's exact token stream before blaming the graph. - **One variable at a time at ship time.** Repair published artifacts from the published files, not from local experiments; verify by checksum that what you gated is what you shipped. ## Output layout Ship each conversion as a recipe, the same split the model-recipe skills use — export, verification, and repair each separately re-runnable: ``` <model>/ convert_<model>.py export driver: flags, template swap, quant recipe templates/<model>.jinja the minimal template the bundle embeds verify/ gate scripts + their JSON results README.md versions, recipe, gate numbers (device + backend + runtime named), known limitations — honest ones ``` State known limitations on the card in actionable form ("prompts whose templated length lands on 33–37 tokens can end the reply early; adding or removing a word avoids it" — a real example). An honest limitation note survives contact with users; a hidden one becomes an issue report.
عرض على GitHub