Skip to main content

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering a bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٢٠ أكتوبر ٢٠٢٦ في ١٦:٢٥
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
١٬٤٠١
التفرعات
٣٩٩

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

مستكشف الملفات
9 ملفات

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
systematic-debugging
description
Use when encountering a bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
# Execute Bug, failure, or unexpected behavior: 1. **Isolate** — read error, reproduce, inspect the diff, and drill upward through diagnostic layers: L1 symptom → L2 logic → L3 system → L4 architecture → L5 cross-system contract → L6 platform → L7 spec gap. Layers are observation altitudes, not one causal chain; the causal shape at the stop altitude is classified explicitly before any root claim. Stop only when causal proof accounts for the recurrence generator or reaches a T-class boundary. 2. **Identify owner** — compare working behavior, trace the bad value, locate the canonical owner, and treat duplicate owners as a finding. 3. **Decide before editing** — Before fixing, run Patch-Shape Triage and Ripple Signal Triage when shared logic, contracts, fallbacks, adapters, producer/consumer seams, or source-of-truth boundaries are involved. Surface Change Necessity for any new source-code path or non-trivial source edit. Run Minimality Check for a new branch, fallback, adapter, owner, or compatibility path, and Pre-Edit Complexity Check for an overloaded owner or complexity growth. After Change Necessity selects `code-change` and before the first repair edit, own the TDD Route for the repair slice per `test-driven-development` (`off` default; `strict` on behavior/bugfix/shared/contract/persistence/permission/migration risk). 4. **Prove** — test one hypothesis with the smallest reproduction or verification. A failing test first is required only by a recorded `TDD Route: strict`; with `TDD Mode: off`, do not require a failing test or RED/GREEN cycle. Three failed fixes means stop and question architecture. 5. **Repair and close** — fix minimally at the canonical owner, verify in proportion to risk, review architecture, and close both repair and retirement tracks. If any symptom remains, stop and diagnose it separately. Done: confidence ≥ B, causal status matches recurrence evidence or an external terminal, tracks explicit, no H signal, and required D evidence passes. ## Core invariant Find root cause and fix the bug class at its canonical owner. A minimal fix is not the smallest textual diff; it is the smallest sufficient owner-level repair. ## Quick bug lane For a low-risk, reproducible, single-owner bug with no patch-shape signal, keep the readback compact: `Symptom`, `Reproduction`, `Root Cause`, `Change Necessity`, `Fix Boundary`, and `Verification`. Skip the causal card only when the causal-proof owner's `Quick Exit Proof` passes. Quick bug lane must surface Change Necessity before source edits. One sentence may cover the user-visible need, no-change/non-code option, why code must change, minimum boundary, and an explicit decision token such as `Decision: code-change`. If shared logic, a contract, fallback, duplicate owner, consumer patch, or cross-module behavior appears, leave this lane. `Aegis Visibility` names the evidence/owner/patch-shape/verification effect. Pass root cause, avoided misfix, boundary, evidence, complexity, and risk to `verification-before-completion`; no separate receipt. ## Diagnose before repair For UI/interaction defects, compose `ui-ux-governance` for relevant state and recovery rules at the user-visible seam. Keep reproduction/root-cause ownership here; a proposed manual check is not executed evidence. 1. Read the complete error/stack and record inputs, environment, versions, and success criteria. Reproduce the user's failed outcome on the correct object, through final delivery; successful parsing or green internal checks may hide the failure. Verify the repaired behavior and a relevant neighboring case, not a hardcoded example. Read-only diagnosis does not authorize repair. 2. Reproduce consistently. If unstable, read `feedback-loop-construction.md` **only when evidence shows intermittent or timing-dependent reproduction** and build a bounded loop. Shrink the repro to load-bearing elements as the test input, never the fix scope: still drill upward; test at the correct seam. 3. Inspect recent changes and compare a working example. Code is evidence; if authority, glossary, code, and tests disagree, compose `establishing-project-context` rather than silently redefining a term. 4. Instrument component boundaries, then trace the bad value toward its source. Read `root-cause-tracing.md` **only when the observed bad value is several calls or components downstream from its origin**. For task distortion, follow source → understanding → expression → execution → delivery to the first evidenced change in meaning. This identifies where divergence is observed, not a proven root; reuse sufficient current evidence. 5. State one hypothesis and falsify it with one-variable evidence. Do not stack speculative fixes. End each loop with `Goal | DeeperCause | Evidence | Risk/Unknown | Decision`. ### Canonical-owner and patch-shape gate Before editing, continue upward unless evidence proves the local site is the canonical owner when the candidate is any of these signals: - keyword, phrase, regex, negation-word list, or sample-text exception; - local guard, extra conditional, `try`/`catch`, early return, or one-off branch; - fallback, adapter, compatibility branch, prompt branch, or legacy path expansion; - consumer/caller/readiness/presentation-layer patch; - downstream logic re-parses raw text or re-infers action/state while typed intent, normalized state, contract, or another source-of-truth exists; - artifact/download/export/readback/cache patch without producer/owner proof. ```text PatchShape: CanonicalOwner: UpwardDrillSignal: Decision: fix owner | continue investigation | escalate ``` A locally green test does not erase triage; a renamed carrier is not a new direction. When a repair may reinterpret or retire existing semantics, responsibility, contract, or relationship, name the behavior to preserve, highest-risk counterexample, and material unknown. For each known explicit anchor or upstream/downstream reference, state its role and disposition: preserve, rebind to the canonical owner, retire with reason, or reject because of conflict. Leave unresolved relationships unknown; do not re-infer them downstream. Bind role before value and retire invalid responsibility, not evidenced carrier capability. This bounded reminder is not a behavior matrix, relationship graph, referential-integrity proof, or exhaustive discovery claim. It adds no artifact, TDD risk signal, or regression scope; the existing TDD route owner and configured/default mode still apply. If the diagnosis crosses L3, a patch-shape signal fires, a user disputes the root claim, a prior fix leaves a symptom, compound/root topology is plausible, two or more anchored manifestations of one incident exist, reproduction conditions diverge across occurrences, or an upstream producer/config/default/contract/spec remains unexcluded, read `root-cause-claim-contract.md` **before claiming a root cause**. It is the sole owner of the Pre-Claim Gate, causal-closure/falsifier proof, layer-ceiling proof, and Causal Topology Gate. ### Change Necessity This decision is behavior-triggered, not prompt-triggered. It applies to any new source-code path. Before that path or a non-trivial source edit, expose the `Change Necessity` decision (`no-change | docs/config-only | code-change | needs-clarification`); field detail lives in `advanced-debugging-governance.md`. ### Minimality and owner fit For any proposed branch, fallback, adapter, compatibility path, or new owner, run `Minimality Check` (fields in `advanced-debugging-governance.md`) with verdict `sufficient repair | local patch | needs first-principles review`, and retire invalid responsibility: a `local patch` needs a retention reason and retirement trigger. For a new non-ordinary repair surface, run the `Existence Check` in `docs/current/AEGIS_MINIMALITY_REFERENCE.md`. If retirement involves old code, external compatibility, or persistent-state risk, compose `anti-entropy-governance`; it chooses the retirement path but never grants destructive authority. Before editing an overloaded or mixed-purpose owner, complete `Pre-Edit Complexity Check` and `Pre-Edit Owner-Fit Decision` (templates in `advanced-debugging-governance.md`). Use `using-aegis/references/complexity-governance.md` for pressure signals. Do not add `new-responsibility` in place by default. If the safer boundary changes the approved shape, update the plan/spec first. ## Repair and proportional verification Implement one owner fix; no bundled “while here” work. Under strict TDD, create the smallest failing test first. With TDD off, a reproduction is diagnostic evidence, not a RED gate or a prerequisite for production edits. Verification must match the risk: - local single-owner repair: original reproduction plus focused regression; - shared/contract/cross-module repair: canonical owner plus affected consumers and compatibility boundary; - fallback/owner retirement: main-path, lingering-reference, negative, and boundary checks; - timing/concurrency repair: read `condition-based-waiting.md` **only when evidence identifies polling, sleeps, or race timing as part of the cause**; - invalid state crossing several trusted boundaries: read `defense-in-depth.md` **only after the root repair is known and evidence shows a second independent validation boundary is required**. Read `advanced-debugging-governance.md` **before another fix** for failed/ persistent / divergent repair or three failures; for unclear/disputed stop / Layer Stop Card / intervention; or plausible compound root. Closeout triggers: repair-added patch-shape; multi-site/one-regression; remaining pattern/anomaly/duplicate/wrong-owner/downstream repair; uninspected same-symptom fix; open recurrence/unsupported root status; missing compound topology-specific member/anti-disguise proof; outside-repo authority; unmigrated published-contract break; undefined spec; missing permission/info. They route H/T/D; detail is not causal proof. For non-trivial debugging with configured workspace support: ```bash python <aegis-workspace-helper> init --root <target-project-root> python <aegis-workspace-helper> new-work --root <target-project-root> ... python <aegis-workspace-helper> add-evidence --root <target-project-root> --work <YYYY-MM-DD-slug> ... python <aegis-workspace-helper> check --root <target-project-root> ``` Failed attempts use `<aegis-workspace-helper> add-attempt`; `add-evidence` is terminal-only. Fast bug fix or quick bug fix pressure does not skip this: if Ripple Signal Triage fires, record it before editing and verify the canonical owner plus affected downstream path. Records are advisory, not completion authority. ## Closure Always report: - **Repair** — cause, owner, smallest change, compatibility, verification. - **Retirement** — invalid responsibility status, carrier/capability disposition, retention reason/trigger, removal check. Confirm the reproduction, same-pattern handling, authority, complexity, and retirement. Prefix debug logs (e.g. `[DEBUG-a4f2]`); confirm one-grep removal before close. Confidence: A = direct regression evidence; B = strong evidence with bounded unknowns; C = partial and not resolved. `Trace Digest` may summarize audit evidence; never expose chain-of-thought or replace root-cause, rule-effect, and verification evidence.
عرض على GitHub