| name | regulatory-research-fallback |
| description | Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs |
Regulatory Research Fallback Workflow
This skill provides a systematic approach to gathering regulatory/compliance information when primary web extraction tools fail on government or regulatory website URLs.
When to Use This Skill
read_webpage returns "unknown error" on .gov or regulatory PDF URLs
search_web fails to retrieve current regulatory information
- You need to create compliance checklists or regulatory documentation
- Primary sources are inaccessible but the task must be completed
Step-by-Step Procedure
Step 1: Attempt Primary Source Extraction
First, try standard web extraction tools:
1. Use read_webpage on the regulatory URL
2. Use search_web for supplementary regulatory information
3. Document which tools failed and with what errors
Step 2: Activate Fallback - Shell Agent Research
When primary tools fail, delegate to shell_agent for secondary research:
Task: "Research [TOPIC] compliance requirements using available system tools.
Gather information from alternative sources including:
- State/federal regulatory summaries
- Industry compliance guides
- Professional association resources
Focus on actionable checklist items for [SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT]"
Example shell_agent task for pharmacy compliance:
"Research pharmacy compliance requirements for [state]. Gather information
about licensing, storage, dispensing, and documentation requirements from
available sources. Create structured notes on mandatory compliance areas."
Step 3: Apply Domain Knowledge
When sources remain inaccessible, use established domain knowledge:
For pharmacy compliance, standard areas include:
- Licensing and registration requirements
- Controlled substance handling
- Prescription record-keeping
- Storage and security protocols
- Patient counseling requirements
- Continuing education obligations
Step 4: Create Documentation with Confidence Levels
Structure output with clear sourcing transparency:
## [Requirement Area]
**Status**: Based on standard regulatory framework (primary sources inaccessible)
**Key Requirements**:
- [Item 1] - Standard industry requirement
- [Item 2] - Common regulatory expectation
- [Item 3] - Best practice guideline
**Note**: Verify with [specific agency] for jurisdiction-specific requirements
Step 5: Flag Verification Needs
Always include disclaimers when using fallback approach:
⚠️ **Verification Required**: This checklist was created using secondary
sources due to primary regulatory website inaccessibility. Please verify
all requirements with the official [Agency Name] before implementation.
Key Principles
- Persevere through failures - Tool errors don't mean task failure
- Layer your research - Try multiple approaches before concluding information is unavailable
- Be transparent - Clearly mark when information comes from secondary sources
- Provide value anyway - A best-effort checklist is better than no guidance
- Flag verification needs - Help users understand what needs official confirmation
Example Output Structure
# [Compliance Area] Checklist
## Source Transparency
This document was created using secondary research methods due to
inaccessibility of primary regulatory sources. All items should be
verified with official authorities.
## Core Requirements
[Checklist items based on standard regulatory framework]
## Verification Steps
[List of specific items requiring official confirmation]
## Recommended Next Actions
1. Contact [Agency] for current requirements
2. Review [Official Publication] when accessible
3. Consult with [Professional Association] for updates
Applicable Domains
This workflow applies to:
- Pharmacy/healthcare compliance
- Financial regulatory requirements
- Environmental compliance
- Building codes and permits
- Employment law requirements
- Any jurisdiction-specific regulatory research
name: regulatory-research-fallback
category: workflow
version: 1.0