| name | true-seeing |
| description | Use this spell when the surface presentation is misleading and you need to see what is actually there — beneath the marketing, the abstractions, the outdated docs, or the complexity. |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| author | Wizards of the Ghosts |
| license | CC0-1.0 |
| compatibility | Hermes Agent skills system |
| metadata | {"hermes":{"tags":["spell","shipping-now","metaphorical","investigation-and-preparation","analysis","discovery","translation","preflight"]}} |
True Seeing
Pierce through abstraction, spin, and obfuscation to surface ground truth.
What This Skill Does
Use this spell when the surface presentation is misleading and you need to see what is actually there — beneath the marketing, the abstractions, the outdated docs, or the complexity.
In this grimoire, True Seeing is treated as a metaphorical spell with a shipping-now delivery profile.
Canonical reference input: True Seeing (spell).
When To Use
- A claim, document, or system description feels too clean and you suspect important details are hidden or glossed over.
- You need to verify what something actually does versus what it says it does.
- Abstraction layers, marketing language, or organizational complexity are obscuring the real state of affairs.
Prerequisites
- No extra runtime dependencies beyond Hermes Agent and the normal toolset for this session.
Procedure
- Restate the target, the success condition, and any no-touch boundaries before taking action.
- Identify the claim, abstraction, or presentation to examine.
- Trace through to primary sources, actual behavior, raw data, or ground-level implementation.
- Compare the surface presentation against the discovered ground truth.
- Return the discrepancies, confirmed truths, and remaining uncertainties.
- Package the result as the deliverables below, with confidence, assumptions, and unresolved risk called out explicitly.
Deliverables
- A ground-truth assessment comparing claims against evidence.
- A list of confirmed facts, identified discrepancies, and unresolvable unknowns.
- A recommendation on which claims to trust and which to investigate further.
Pitfalls / Guardrails
- Keep the metaphor anchored to a real mechanism instead of drifting into lore.
- Do not present your own interpretation as objective truth — show the evidence chain.
- Acknowledge when ground truth is genuinely unknowable rather than forcing a conclusion.
Verification
- Check that the result includes every deliverable promised above.
- Check that confirmed facts, assumptions, and inferences are visibly separated.
- Check that the metaphor still maps cleanly to a real operational mechanism.
Example Invocation
/true-seeing look past the surface of this situation and tell me what is actually true, what is spin, and what we cannot yet know
