codexkit-mcp-onboarding

name	codexkit-mcp-onboarding
description	Evaluate and phase MCP adoption with a bias toward the smallest set of integrations that materially improve engineering work.
version	1.0.0
category	runbook

MCP Onboarding

Use this skill when deciding whether a repo or team should add MCP servers and how to roll them out safely.

Workflow

1. Start from real engineering tasks, not tool hype.
2. Map each task to the minimum useful MCP capability.
3. Prefer read-only or low-risk integrations first.
4. Define who owns secrets, scopes, and monitoring.
5. Document why each server exists and when to remove it.

Strong candidates

• docs and API lookup
• issue tracker triage
• repository metadata and pull request context
• observability lookups with strict access control

Avoid

• installing every available MCP server
• shipping write access without auditability
• embedding team-specific secrets in public examples

Quality Criteria

• Steps are executable in sequence without external context
• Decision points have clear if/then branching
• Rollback or abort procedures are documented for risky steps
• Expected duration or time-per-step is estimated

Verification (4C)

Check	Question
Correctness	Do the steps execute correctly in the order specified?
Completeness	Are decision points, error handling, and escalation paths all documented?
Context-fit	Could someone with the right access but no prior context complete this runbook?
Consequence	If Step N fails and the operator skips to Step N+1, what breaks?

Edge Cases

• Steps require access the operator doesn't have — Document exact access requirements upfront. Include escalation contact for emergency access.
• Environment differs from documented state — Add a pre-flight check as Step 0 to verify prerequisites before starting.
• Runbook is triggered during off-hours — Document who to contact and which steps can be safely deferred to business hours.

Changelog

• v1.0.0 — Initial release