| name | hai-ast-grep |
| description | Produces a ready-to-run ast-grep pattern or YAML rule that structurally searches, lints, or auto-rewrites code via tree-sitter AST matching, validated against positive + negative fixtures. Trigger on ast-grep, sg scan, sgconfig, tree-sitter, AST matching, structural search-and-replace, codemod — and ALSO on these tasks unnamed: (1) structural search — "list every call site of X before I refactor", "find async functions that never await", or whenever grep/regex over/under-matches (hits comments/strings, misses formatting variants); (2) batch rewrite — "replace all console.log with logger", "rename this function everywhere", "change this signature at every call site", "migrate this API repo-wide"; (3) guard — "write a lint rule for this", "ban this usage in CI". Chinese triggers: 写 ast-grep 规则, 结构化搜索, 结构化搜索替换, 语法树匹配, 按语法找代码, 找出所有调用 X 的地方, 哪些地方用了这个 API, 重构前先找全调用点, grep 误报太多, 正则匹配不准, 批量改写代码, 批量重命名, 全局改函数签名, 改参数顺序, 升级旧 API, codemod, 写个 lint 规则, 禁止这种写法, 自动改写代码.
|
hai-ast-grep
ast-grep uses tree-sitter to parse code into AST, enabling precise pattern matching. Reach for it whenever a search or refactor depends on syntax structure: one-off searches and rewrites run straight from the CLI, reusable lint/codemod rules are written in YAML. Either way the job is not "write a pattern" — it is to ship a pattern or rule validated against a positive AND a negative case, so it catches what it should and nothing it shouldn't.
Project Configuration
Project-level batch scanning via ast-grep scan requires an sgconfig.yml config file; one-off pattern tests via ast-grep run -p '<pattern>' do not.
ruleDirs:
- rules
Typical project structure:
my-project/
├── sgconfig.yml
├── rules/
│ ├── no-console.yml
│ └── custom/
│ └── team-rules.yml
└── src/
Run a project scan:
ast-grep scan
ast-grep scan --config path/to/sgconfig.yml
Note: the ast-grep scan command requires sgconfig.yml, while ast-grep run -p works standalone.
Everyday CLI Usage (no rule file)
Most day-to-day search and refactor work never needs YAML or sgconfig — ast-grep run (the default subcommand) does it directly:
ast-grep run -p 'fetch($URL)' -l ts src/
ast-grep run -p 'console.log($$$)' -C 2 src/
ast-grep run -p 'console.log($$$)' --json=stream src/
ast-grep run -p 'console.log($$$A)' -r 'logger.log($$$A)' -l ts -i src/
ast-grep run -p 'oldFn($A, $B)' -r 'newFn($B, $A)' -l ts -U src/
Flags that matter:
| Flag | Meaning |
|---|
-p <pattern> | the AST pattern to match |
-r <template> | rewrite template — in run; in scan, -r means rule FILE, don't mix them up |
-l <lang> | language (ts, tsx, py, go, rs…); inferred from file extensions when omitted |
-i | interactive accept/reject per match — default this before any mass rewrite |
-U | apply all rewrites; without it matches are only reported |
-C <n> / --json | context lines / JSON output |
Deliver the pattern, the exact command, and a match summary. Escalate to a YAML rule only when the match needs constraints / not / inside narrowing, or will be re-run (CI guard, reusable codemod).
Rule Workflow
Lint Rule (most common)
Check-only, no fix — for CI / editor diagnostics:
id: no-console-log
language: JavaScript
severity: warning
message: Avoid console.log in production code
rule:
pattern: console.log($$$ARGS)
Validate:
ast-grep scan -r rules/no-console-log.yml src/
Rewrite Rule (optional)
To auto-fix, add ONE fix: line to the lint rule above — nothing else changes:
fix: logger.log($$$ARGS)
Apply the fix (note the --update-all flag — scan without it only reports):
ast-grep scan -r rules/no-console-log.yml --update-all src/
Development Flow (canonical workflow — follow these steps)
- Explore the pattern via CLI before writing YAML:
ast-grep -p 'console.log($ARG)' src/. Inspect node types with --debug-query ast when the pattern won't match:
ast-grep -p 'console.log($ARG)' --debug-query ast
- Write the rule file (
.yml) — start with the lint form (pattern + message + severity).
- Validate against a POSITIVE fixture — code that should match:
ast-grep scan -r rule.yml fixtures/. Confirm it matches.
- Validate against a NEGATIVE fixture — code that looks similar but should NOT match. If it matches, you have a false positive: add
constraints, not, inside, or has to narrow the rule, then re-run both fixtures.
- Add
fix: only if a mechanical rewrite is wanted, then dry-run before --update-all.
- Deliver using the deliverable shape below (and
references/output-template.md) — never hand back a bare YAML block.
Essential Syntax
Cheat sheet for fast in-context lookup. Full syntax in references/rule-syntax.md.
| Element | Syntax | Example |
|---|
| Single node | $VAR | console.log($MSG) |
| Multiple nodes | $$$ARGS | fn($$$ARGS) |
| Same content | Use same name | $A == $A |
| Non-capturing | $_VAR | $_FN($_FN) |
| Capture unnamed | $$VAR | async function $$NAME() {} |
Core Rules Quick Reference
Cheat sheet. Full atomic / composite / relational rules in references/rule-syntax.md.
| Type | Purpose | Example |
|---|
pattern | Match code structure | pattern: if ($COND) {} |
kind | Match AST node type | kind: function_declaration |
all | Match ALL conditions | all: [pattern: X, kind: Y] |
any | Match ANY condition | any: [pattern: var $A, pattern: let $A] |
not | Exclude matches | not: {pattern: safe_call()} |
has | Must have child | has: {kind: return_statement} |
inside | Must be in ancestor | inside: {kind: class_body} |
Deliverable Shape
Hand back the rule in this shape — not a bare YAML block. These are the five headers from references/output-template.md; read that file for the full template before finalizing.
- Goal — what code pattern this finds or rewrites.
- Rule — the
.yml (id, language, rule, message, severity).
- Fix, if applicable — the added
fix: line.
- Validation — positive fixture (should match), negative fixture (should NOT match), the exact command run (
ast-grep scan --rule <file> or -r <file> src/), and the result.
- Notes — false positives avoided (how), and known limits (cases intentionally not covered).
Detailed References
Complete syntax guide: See references/rule-syntax.md
- Atomic rules (pattern, kind, regex, nthChild, range)
- Composite rules (all, any, not, matches)
- Relational rules (has, inside, follows, precedes)
- Transform and fixConfig
Language-specific patterns: See references/common-patterns.md
- JavaScript/TypeScript examples
- Python examples
- Go and Rust examples
Output template: See references/output-template.md — the full, copy-pasteable version of the Deliverable Shape above (positive/negative fixtures, exact validation command, known-limits field).
Supported Languages
Bash, C, Cpp, CSharp, Css, Elixir, Go, Haskell, Hcl, Html, Java, JavaScript, Json, Kotlin, Lua, Nix, Php, Python, Ruby, Rust, Scala, Solidity, Swift, Tsx, TypeScript, Yaml
Use a Different Skill When
ast-grep is the right hammer only when the match depends on syntax structure — search, lint, or rewrite. Route elsewhere when:
- Plain text or regex find-and-replace with no syntax-tree shape (rename a string literal, swap a URL, find a unique identifier that grep already nails) — just use grep / a normal edit /
sed; an AST pattern is overkill.
- One-off edit in a single file — edit it directly; a rule only pays off across many call sites.
- Type-aware or semantic refactor (driven by what a value's type is, not its syntax — e.g. eliminate
any) — use ts-type-safety-reviewer. ast-grep matches syntax, not types.
- Subjective code-quality review ("is this clean / well-named / over-engineered", code smells) — use
clean-code-reviewer; for a behavior-preserving cleanup pass use code-simplifier.
- Pure formatting / whitespace / import order — that is a formatter's job (Prettier, Biome, gofmt), not a structural rule.