identify-doc-code-disagreements

name	identify-doc-code-disagreements
argument-hint	["target_path"]
description	Identify places under the $1 path where the docs and code disagree

The argument $1 is the path to scan. It may be an entire library (e.g. libs/mngr, or just the bare name mngr) or any subdirectory within one (e.g. libs/mngr/imbue/mngr/cli), so you can scope this skill narrowly to part of a library when that is all you care about.

Before doing anything else, resolve these two things from $1 and state them explicitly:

• The scan scope: the directory tree you will examine. This is $1 itself, resolved to a real path. (If $1 is a bare library name like mngr, resolve it to libs/mngr or apps/mngr -- whichever exists.) You must only report findings for code under this path.
• The containing library: the project directory that owns the scan scope. Projects always live at libs/<name> or apps/<name>, so the containing library is exactly that two-component prefix of the scan-scope path (e.g. for a scan scope of libs/mngr/imbue/mngr/cli, the containing library is libs/mngr; for a scan scope of libs/mngr, it is libs/mngr itself). You need this both to gather context and to know where to write the output file -- so make sure you have identified it unambiguously before continuing.

Go gather all the context for the containing library (per instructions in CLAUDE.md). Even when the scan scope is a small subdirectory, you still need the whole containing library's context (style guide, primitives, data_types, interfaces, utils) to evaluate the code in context. Be sure to read the containing library's non_issues.md as well.

Once you've gathered that context, please do the below.

Your task is to identify disagreements between the implementation and the documentation within the scan scope.

In particular, focus on logical, meaningful conflicts between what is said in any written documentation and what is actually implemented in the code.

Do NOT worry about functionality that is still clearly in-progress, under construction, etc--if something simply has not yet been implemented, that's ok. At most, you can suggest that the code be better about raising a NotImplementedError in such cases.

We want to focus on issues where something actually is implemented, but it's not implemented how the docs say it should be.

Do NOT worry other disagreements between really long, claude-generated "spec" files and the code (those are usually just left-over construction artifacts). If anything, you can simply highlight places where there was a big detailed spec that should have been deleted.

Do NOT worry other types of issues besides conflicts between the docs and code.

Do NOT report issues that are already covered by an existing FIXME

Do NOT report issues that are highlighted as non-issues in non_issues.md

After reviewing all the code in the scan scope, think carefully about the most important disagreements between the docs and code.

Then put them, in order from most important to least important, into a markdown file in the containing library's "_tasks/docs/" folder (make one if you have to, and always use the containing library's folder even when the scan scope was a subdirectory, so the findings live where create-fixmes and the other identify-* outputs expect them). Name the file ".md` (where you should get "date" by calling this precise command: "date +%Y-%m-%d-%T | tr : -")

For the format of the file, use the following:

# Doc and code disagreements under <scan scope> (identified on <date>)
## 1. <Short description of disagreement>

Description: <detailed description of the disagreement, including file names and line numbers where applicable>

Recommendation: <your recommendation for how to fix the disagreement>

Decision: Accept

## 2. <Short description of disagreement>

Description: <detailed description of the disagreement, including file names and line numbers where applicable>

Recommendation: 

Decision: Accept

...

There's no need to commit when you're done (these files are gitignored). Just be sure to create the file in the right location with the right content.