prismalab-prisma-compliance

name	prismalab-prisma-compliance
description	Validate systematic reviews against PRISMA 2020 checklist and generate compliance reports. Covers all 27 checklist items and abstract checklist.

PrismaLab PRISMA 2020 Compliance Skill

When to Use

• User needs to check a manuscript against PRISMA 2020
• User needs to generate a PRISMA checklist for submission
• User asks about reporting requirements for systematic reviews
• User needs PRISMA-S (search reporting), PRISMA-P (protocol), or PRISMA-ScR (scoping reviews)

PRISMA 2020 Checklist (27 Items)

Title

1. Identify the report as a systematic review

Abstract

2. Structured summary (PRISMA abstract checklist: 12 items)

Introduction

3. Rationale for the review
4. Objectives with PICO elements

Methods

5. Eligibility criteria
6. Information sources (databases, registers, other sources)
7. Search strategy (full strategy for at least one database)
8. Selection process
9. Data collection process
10. Data items (outcomes, other variables)
11. Study risk of bias assessment
12. Effect measures
13. Synthesis methods
14. Reporting bias assessment
15. Certainty assessment (GRADE)

Results

16. Study selection (PRISMA flow diagram)
17. Study characteristics
18. Risk of bias in studies
19. Results of individual studies
20. Results of syntheses
21. Reporting biases
22. Certainty of evidence

Discussion

23. Discussion of results in context
24. Limitations
25. Conclusions and implications

Other Information

26. Registration and protocol
27. Support and funding

Compliance Check Workflow

Input

Provide the manuscript text (paste or upload PDF).

Processing

# Use GPT-4.1 to assess each checklist item
compliance_prompt = """
Assess this systematic review manuscript against the PRISMA 2020 checklist.
For each of the 27 items, provide:
- Item number and name
- Status: PRESENT / PARTIAL / ABSENT
- Location: page/section where found (if present)
- Comment: what's missing or could be improved

Also check:
- Is the PRISMA flow diagram present and complete?
- Is the search strategy reproducible?
- Are effect measures clearly defined?
- Is heterogeneity assessed and reported?
- Is the GRADE assessment present?
- Is AI assistance declared in methods?
"""

Output Format

## PRISMA 2020 Compliance Report

**Overall Score: X/27 items fully reported**

| # | Item | Status | Location | Comment |
|---|------|--------|----------|---------|
| 1 | Title | PRESENT | p.1 | Identified as systematic review |
| 2 | Abstract | PARTIAL | p.1 | Missing registration number |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

### Critical Gaps
- [ ] Item X: [description of what's missing]
- [ ] Item Y: [description of what's missing]

### Recommendations
1. [Specific recommendation to address gap]
2. [Specific recommendation to address gap]

PRISMA Extensions Supported

Extension	Use Case
PRISMA-P	Protocol reporting (pre-registration)
PRISMA-S	Search strategy reporting
PRISMA-ScR	Scoping review reporting
PRISMA-DTA	Diagnostic test accuracy reviews
PRISMA-IPD	Individual participant data meta-analyses
PRISMA-NMA	Network meta-analyses

Integration with Other PrismaLab Skills

• After compliance check → prismalab-systematic-review to fix gaps
• After identifying missing synthesis → prismalab-meta-analysis to compute
• After identifying missing data → prismalab-evidence-extraction to extract

Quality Standards

• Compliance check is advisory, not authoritative
• Final compliance determination is the author's responsibility
• Some items require subjective judgment (e.g., "adequate" rationale)
• Journal-specific requirements may differ from PRISMA 2020