Skip to main content

service-matrix-truth

Reconcile the Azure service matrix by correcting stub services from active to placeholder status with accurate inventory

الانتقال إلى التثبيت

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
Insightpulseai/odoo
آخر نشاط في المصدر
١٢ أبريل ٢٠٢٦ في ١١:٥٦
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
٦
التفرعات
٢

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

مستكشف الملفات
2 ملفات

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
service-matrix-truth
description
Reconcile the Azure service matrix by correcting stub services from active to placeholder status with accurate inventory
version
1.0
compatibility
{"hosts":["github-copilot","claude-code","codex-cli","cursor","gemini-cli"]}
tags
["governance","observability","aca","architecture"]
# service-matrix-truth **Impact tier**: P2 -- Quality / Accuracy ## Purpose Close the inventory accuracy gap where the service matrix (`infra/ssot/azure/ service-matrix.yaml`) lists nginx:alpine stub containers as "active" services. The benchmark audit found: Auth Gateway (svc_004), MCP Coordinator (svc_005), and OCR Service (svc_006) are all nginx:alpine stubs with no functional implementation, yet they appear as `status: active` / `promotion_state: live`. This creates false confidence in the platform's operational surface. ## When to Use - Auditing the service matrix for truth alignment. - Preparing for a go-live readiness review where service status matters. - Reconciling Azure resource inventory with actual deployed workloads. - Removing phantom services from monitoring and alerting. ## Required Evidence (inspect these repo paths first) | Path | What to look for | |------|-----------------| | `infra/ssot/azure/service-matrix.yaml` | Services with `note:` containing "Stub" or "nginx:alpine" | | `infra/ssot/azure/resources.yaml` | ACA entries for stub services | | `docs/runbooks/ODOO18_GO_LIVE_CHECKLIST.md` | Service verification line items | | `docs/audits/ODOO_AZURE_ENTERPRISE_BENCHMARK.md` | Inventory accuracy gap row | ## Microsoft Learn MCP Usage Run at least these three queries: 1. `microsoft_docs_search("Azure Container Apps list revisions active image")` -- retrieves how to verify what image is actually running in an ACA app. 2. `microsoft_docs_search("Azure Resource Graph query container apps image")` -- retrieves ARG queries to audit deployed container images at scale. 3. `microsoft_docs_search("Azure well-architected operational excellence inventory")` -- retrieves WAF guidance on maintaining accurate service inventories. ## Workflow 1. **Inspect repo** -- Read `service-matrix.yaml`. Identify every service with `note:` containing "Stub", "nginx:alpine", or "Replace with". List them. 2. **Query MCP** -- Run the three searches. Capture ACA revision inspection commands and ARG query syntax for image verification. 3. **Compare** -- For each stub service, determine: (a) Is there a real implementation planned? (b) What is the target image? (c) What is the timeline? If no implementation is planned, the service should be marked `status: stub` or `status: placeholder`, not `active`. 4. **Patch** -- Update `service-matrix.yaml`: - Change stub services from `status: active` to `status: stub`. - Change `promotion_state: live` to `promotion_state: placeholder`. - Add `target_image:` field documenting what will replace nginx:alpine. - Add `target_date:` field if a timeline exists. Update `resources.yaml` to match. 5. **Verify** -- No nginx:alpine service has `status: active`. All stub services are clearly marked. Go-live checklist distinguishes real services from placeholders. ## Outputs | File | Change | |------|--------| | `infra/ssot/azure/service-matrix.yaml` | Stub status correction | | `infra/ssot/azure/resources.yaml` | Lifecycle alignment | | `docs/runbooks/ODOO18_GO_LIVE_CHECKLIST.md` | Service verification criteria | | `docs/evidence/<stamp>/service-matrix-truth/` | Before/after diff, MCP excerpts | ## Completion Criteria - [ ] No service with `note:` containing "Stub" or "nginx:alpine" has `status: active`. - [ ] Stub services use `status: stub` or `status: placeholder`. - [ ] Stub services have `promotion_state: placeholder` (not `live`). - [ ] Each stub service documents its `target_image` and `target_date`. - [ ] `resources.yaml` lifecycle fields match `service-matrix.yaml` status. - [ ] Go-live checklist distinguishes between real and placeholder services. - [ ] Evidence directory contains the before/after YAML diff.
عرض على GitHub