ix-debug

name	ix-debug
description	Root cause analysis — trace execution path to a failure, narrow candidates, read minimal source only at suspected failure points.
metadata	{"openclaw":{"requires":{"bins":["ix"]}}}

Run command -v ix to verify ix is on PATH. Never use tilde paths (~/...) or absolute paths — always invoke ix directly via PATH. If not found, fall back to Grep + Read.

Goal

Answer: where in the execution path is this likely failing, and why? Stop once you have 1–3 root cause candidates with supporting evidence.

Phase 1 — Locate the entry point (always)

timeout 60s ix locate $ARGUMENTS --limit 5 --format llm

If $ARGUMENTS is a symptom description rather than a symbol name, also run:

timeout 60s ix text "$ARGUMENTS" --limit 10 --format llm

Identify the most likely entry point (where the failure originates or first manifests).

Phase 2 — Explain (always)

timeout 60s ix explain <entry-point> --format llm

Extract: role, callers, callees, confidence. Identify whether this is:

• A boundary (external input, API, event) — failure likely from unexpected input
• An orchestrator — failure likely from wrong sequencing or state
• A utility/helper — failure likely from wrong assumptions by caller

Stop if: the explanation makes the failure source obvious → skip to Output.

Phase 3 — Trace the execution path

timeout 60s ix trace <entry-point> --downstream --format llm

Walk the downstream path. At each step, look for:

• Functions that validate or transform state (potential incorrect assumptions)
• Cross-subsystem calls (where contracts might differ)
• Functions with high callee count (potential god functions, many failure points)

Narrow: Identify the 1–3 nodes most likely to contain the bug.

Stop if: trace reveals an obvious candidate → proceed to Phase 5.

Phase 4 — Callers (if failure might come from upstream)

timeout 60s ix callers <entry-point> --limit 10 --format llm

Check whether the fault is in how this is called rather than in its own logic.

Phase 5 — Targeted code read (only at suspected failure points)

For each root cause candidate (max 2):

timeout 60s ix read <candidate-function> --format llm

Read the specific function only. Look for:

• Edge cases in input handling
• Assumptions about state that might be violated
• Missing null/error checks
• Incorrect sequencing

Hard limit: 2 ix read calls maximum. If still ambiguous, surface the candidates and uncertainty to the user.

Output

## Debug: [entry point]

**Execution path:**
[entry-point] → [step] → [step] → [suspected failure point]

**Root cause candidates:**
1. [function/file] — [reason: what assumption might be wrong]
2. [function/file] — [reason]

**Evidence:**
- [what graph data supports each candidate]
- [what code read revealed, if any]

**Confidence:** [high / medium / low] — [why]

**Next steps:**
- Add logging at [specific point] to confirm
- Check [specific edge case] in [function]
- Run `/ix-investigate <X>` to understand [unclear component] more deeply