Skip to main content

grill-with-docs

Docs-anchored grilling session — challenges a plan against the project's existing language (CONTEXT.md) and recorded decisions (docs/adr/), and updates those files inline as terminology and decisions crystallise.

الانتقال إلى التثبيت

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
JantonioFC/skillsbank
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٤ أغسطس ٢٠٢٦ في ٠٣:١٥
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
٦
التفرعات
٠

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
grill-with-docs
description
Docs-anchored grilling session — challenges a plan against the project's existing language (CONTEXT.md) and recorded decisions (docs/adr/), and updates those files inline as terminology and decisions crystallise.
license
MIT
metadata
{"derived_from":"https://github.com/mattpocock/skills/tree/main/skills/engineering/grill-with-docs","original_author":"Matt Pocock (@mattpocock)","original_license":"MIT","voice":"Matt Pocock — relentless, one-at-a-time, codebase-and-docs-first, ADRs only when 3 criteria are met","version":"1.0.0"}
# Grill with Docs > Derived from [Matt Pocock's grill-with-docs](https://github.com/mattpocock/skills/tree/main/skills/engineering/grill-with-docs) (MIT, © 2026 Matt Pocock). Matt's interview discipline + docs-anchored grilling rules preserved verbatim under MIT. Additions in this repo: 3 stdlib validators (CONTEXT.md linter, ADR scanner, glossary↔code consistency check), 3 in-depth references each citing 7+ authoritative sources, `cs-grill-with-docs` agent, `/cs:grill-with-docs` command. See [Wrapper additions](#wrapper-additions) below. <what-to-do> Interview me relentlessly about every aspect of this plan until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer. Ask the questions one at a time, waiting for feedback on each question before continuing. If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, explore the codebase instead. </what-to-do> <supporting-info> ## Domain awareness During codebase exploration, also look for existing documentation: ### File structure Most repos have a single context: ``` / ├── CONTEXT.md ├── docs/ │ └── adr/ │ ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md │ └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md └── src/ ``` If a `CONTEXT-MAP.md` exists at the root, the repo has multiple contexts. The map points to where each one lives: ``` / ├── CONTEXT-MAP.md ├── docs/ │ └── adr/ ← system-wide decisions ├── src/ │ ├── ordering/ │ │ ├── CONTEXT.md │ │ └── docs/adr/ ← context-specific decisions │ └── billing/ │ ├── CONTEXT.md │ └── docs/adr/ ``` Create files lazily — only when you have something to write. If no `CONTEXT.md` exists, create one when the first term is resolved. If no `docs/adr/` exists, create it when the first ADR is needed. ## During the session ### Challenge against the glossary When the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in `CONTEXT.md`, call it out immediately. "Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y — which is it?" ### Sharpen fuzzy language When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term. "You're saying 'account' — do you mean the Customer or the User? Those are different things." ### Discuss concrete scenarios When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts. ### Cross-reference with code When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you find a contradiction, surface it: "Your code cancels entire Orders, but you just said partial cancellation is possible — which is right?" ### Update CONTEXT.md inline When a term is resolved, update `CONTEXT.md` right there. Don't batch these up — capture them as they happen. Use the format in [CONTEXT-FORMAT.md](./CONTEXT-FORMAT.md). `CONTEXT.md` should be totally devoid of implementation details. Do not treat `CONTEXT.md` as a spec, a scratch pad, or a repository for implementation decisions. It is a glossary and nothing else. ### Offer ADRs sparingly Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true: 1. **Hard to reverse** — the cost of changing your mind later is meaningful 2. **Surprising without context** — a future reader will wonder "why did they do it this way?" 3. **The result of a real trade-off** — there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in [ADR-FORMAT.md](./ADR-FORMAT.md). </supporting-info> ## Wrapper Additions The additions below are **not** part of Matt's upstream skill. They operationalize the upstream's rules into deterministic, stdlib-only validators that pair naturally with the interview loop. ### Workflow (with wrapper tools) 1. **Pre-flight (before the first question):** - Run `scripts/context_md_linter.py CONTEXT.md` if a `CONTEXT.md` exists — confirms the glossary is well-formed before grilling against it. - Run `scripts/adr_scanner.py docs/adr/` if `docs/adr/` exists — surfaces numbering gaps, malformed ADRs, status-frontmatter inconsistencies. - Run `scripts/glossary_code_consistency.py --context CONTEXT.md --code src/` — flags defined-but-unused terms (dead glossary) and code-only common nouns that may need definitions. Use these flags as opening grill questions. 2. **During the session (Matt's rules apply):** - One question per turn, walking depth-first. - When a term is sharpened: edit `CONTEXT.md` immediately; re-run `context_md_linter.py` if the edit is structural. - When an ADR is warranted: write it under `docs/adr/`; re-run `adr_scanner.py` to confirm numbering. 3. **Closing:** - Final `glossary_code_consistency.py` run to confirm no new orphan terms were introduced. - Summarize: terms added/refined, ADRs written, scenarios discussed, open items. ### Tools (stdlib-only) | Tool | One-line role | |---|---| | `scripts/context_md_linter.py` | Validate `CONTEXT.md` against the CONTEXT-FORMAT.md structure. PASS/WARN/FAIL per rule. | | `scripts/adr_scanner.py` | Walk `docs/adr/`, check `NNNN-slug.md` pattern, numbering integrity, body completeness. | | `scripts/glossary_code_consistency.py` | Cross-reference bold terms in `CONTEXT.md` against codebase usage. Flag dead glossary + code-only common nouns. | ### References (citations behind each rule) - [`references/ubiquitous_language.md`](references/ubiquitous_language.md) — why a glossary belongs in source control (Evans, Vernon, Khononov, Wlaschin, Brandolini, Avram & Marinescu, Fowler) - [`references/adr_practice.md`](references/adr_practice.md) — when an ADR earns its keep (Nygard, Tyree & Akerman, Zimmermann Y-statements, MADR, ThoughtWorks Radar, adr-tools, Backstage) - [`references/context_md_as_artifact.md`](references/context_md_as_artifact.md) — CONTEXT.md as living artifact (Khononov on language drift, Kernighan on naming, BoundedContext bliki, Confluent on data contracts, Brandolini on EventStorming glossary) ### Companion - Agent: `cs-grill-with-docs` (see `../../agents/cs-grill-with-docs.md`) - Command: `/cs:grill-with-docs` (see `../../commands/cs-grill-with-docs.md`) --- **Version:** 1.0.0 **Derived:** Matt Pocock's grill-with-docs (MIT) + this repo's wrapper ## Activation Triggers Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against documented domain language, or mentions "grill with docs".
عرض على GitHub