| name | design-biological-experiment |
| description | Use when planning a biological experiment that requires controls, replication, and rigorous methodology to yield valid, reproducible results |
| source | OECD Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) principles; Fisher "The Design of Experiments" (1935); Cold Spring Harbor Protocols experimental design guidelines |
| tags | ["biology","experiment-design","scientific-method","reproducibility"] |
| verified | true |
Design Biological Experiment
Structure a biological experiment with controls, replication, and statistical power to produce valid, reproducible results.
Why This Is Best Practice
Adopted by: OECD member nations (GLP compliance), NIH-funded research programs, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, peer-reviewed journals requiring ARRIVE/CONSORT reporting.
Impact: Fisher's randomized block design reduced experimental error by 30–50% in agricultural trials; GLP-compliant studies have a 60% lower rate of retraction vs. non-compliant studies (Fanelli 2012).
Why best: Randomization eliminates selection bias; replication separates signal from noise; blinding prevents observer bias — together these are the minimal conditions for causal inference in biology.
Sources: OECD GLP Principles (ENV/MC/CHEM(98)17); Fisher (1935); Cold Spring Harbor Protocols experimental design series.
Steps
-
State the hypothesis — write a single falsifiable statement in IF-THEN-BECAUSE form (e.g., "If gene X is knocked out, then cell proliferation will decrease by >20%, because X activates the MAPK pathway").
-
Identify variables — list independent variable (what you manipulate), dependent variable (what you measure), and all confounders you will control.
-
Define controls — include a positive control (known outcome), negative control (no treatment), and vehicle control (solvent only) for every experimental group.
-
Calculate sample size — use power analysis (α=0.05, β=0.20, effect size from pilot or literature) before starting; target ≥80% power. See calculate-statistical-power.
-
Assign randomization — randomly assign subjects/samples to groups using a random number table or software (R, Python) to prevent systematic bias.
-
Plan blinding — blind the experimenter to group assignment during measurement wherever feasible; use coded labels.
-
Write the protocol — document each step with exact reagent concentrations, instrument settings, timing, and acceptance criteria for data quality.
-
Specify statistical analysis — pre-register the primary statistical test, multiple-comparison correction method, and exclusion criteria before data collection.
-
Execute and record — record all deviations from protocol in a lab notebook contemporaneously; photograph key results.
-
Validate reproducibility — replicate the key experiment ≥3 times on separate days (biological replicates, not just technical replicates).
Rules
- Never pool technical replicates as if they were biological replicates — they do not increase statistical power.
- Pre-register hypothesis and analysis plan before data collection to prevent HARKing (Hypothesizing After Results are Known).
- Include both positive and negative controls in every assay run, not just the initial validation.
- Report all exclusions and deviations — omitting failed runs is a form of reporting bias.
Common Mistakes
- Pseudoreplication — treating technical replicates as biological replicates inflates n and produces false precision.
- No positive control — without a positive control, a negative result cannot be distinguished from assay failure.
- Post-hoc hypothesis — fitting the hypothesis to observed data destroys Type I error control and is a form of p-hacking.
- Ignoring batch effects — running treatment and control groups on different days or with different reagent lots introduces confounders.
When NOT to Use
- When performing purely observational or descriptive studies (use appropriate survey or cohort design instead)
- When ethical or feasibility constraints prevent randomization (use quasi-experimental design with explicit limitation disclosure)
- When the research question is exploratory/hypothesis-generating (use pilot study design with no inferential statistics)
