Skip to main content

agent-discovery

Optimize websites, docs, and product surfaces for agent discoverability and operator UX. Use when working on agent SEO/AEO/GEO, crawl policy, markdown or JSON projections, llms.txt, sitemap.md, AGENTS.md guidance, content negotiation, accessibility for browser agents, or any request to make a site easier for pi, OpenCode, Claude Code, ChatGPT, Perplexity, or other agent harnesses to find and use.

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
joelhooks/joelclaw
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٩ أغسطس ٢٠٢٦ في ١٩:٠٥
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
٦٤
التفرعات
٢

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
agent-discovery
displayName
Agent Discovery
description
Optimize websites, docs, and product surfaces for agent discoverability and operator UX. Use when working on agent SEO/AEO/GEO, crawl policy, markdown or JSON projections, llms.txt, sitemap.md, AGENTS.md guidance, content negotiation, accessibility for browser agents, or any request to make a site easier for pi, OpenCode, Claude Code, ChatGPT, Perplexity, or other agent harnesses to find and use.
version
0.1.0
author
Joel Hooks
tags
["web","agents","seo","aeo","ux","content"]
disable-model-invocation
true
# Agent Discovery This skill is about an opinionated blend of **traditional SEO**, **static truth in the initial response**, and **UX ergonomics for agents and operators**. Don't reduce this to "AI SEO". If a page can't be crawled, cited, parsed, navigated, or actioned by an agent harness, it is broken in a way normal SEO reports won't fully show. ## Thesis Treat agent discoverability as four stacked layers: 1. **Search baseline** — crawlable pages, clean robots policy, sitemap, structured data, canonical answers, freshness. 2. **Initial-response truth** — the important facts must be present in the first HTML response. 3. **Machine-readable projections** — markdown/text/JSON surfaces that project the same canonical resource without drift. 4. **Operator ergonomics** — the site should be easy to drive from pi, OpenCode, Claude Code, ChatGPT, or a browser agent without guesswork. If layer 1 is broken, you won't get found. If layer 2 is broken, agents won't extract the truth. If layer 3 is broken, harnesses waste tokens scraping HTML. If layer 4 is broken, operators and browser agents hit dead ends. ## When to Use Use this skill when the task mentions: - agent SEO / AEO / GEO / LLM SEO / AAIO - agent discoverability - optimize site for ChatGPT / Claude / Perplexity / Copilot - llms.txt / sitemap.md / markdown endpoints / content negotiation - AGENTS.md / coding-agent docs / operator docs - agent-friendly docs / machine-readable docs - browser-agent UX / agent automation / accessible automation - making a website easier for agent harnesses to use ## Core Rules ### 1. Do the boring SEO work first Before fancy protocols, verify: - `robots.txt` allows the crawlers you actually want - sitemap exists and stays current - pages that should never rank use `noindex` - titles, descriptions, H1s, and headings agree on the topic - JSON-LD matches visible content exactly - author/date/source signals are visible where trust matters - stale pages get refreshed, redirected, or archived Useful mental model from the audit side: 1. crawlability and indexation 2. technical foundations 3. on-page clarity 4. content quality / trust 5. authority / citations / mentions ### 2. Initial HTML is the truth surface The important facts must survive: - `curl` - a text browser - no-JS mode - cheap retrieval pipelines Don't hide core facts behind: - client-only fetches - tabs and accordions with empty initial HTML - modal-only disclosures - images or PDFs with no HTML equivalent - click handlers on `div`s pretending to be controls Static rendering is a principle, not a framework fetish. A static shell with small dynamic holes is fine. A blank SPA shell is dogshit for both search and agents. ### 3. One resource, multiple truthful projections Give the same resource multiple machine-friendly shapes: - human page → `text/html` - markdown twin or negotiated markdown → `text/markdown` - API / structured route → `application/json` - text hint surface (`llms.txt`, index text) → `text/plain` The rule is **projection, not duplication**. Do not maintain three separate truths for HTML, markdown, and JSON. Project them from one canonical content source. ### 4. `llms.txt` is a hint surface, not a ranking hack Use `llms.txt` or similar text hints as: - a fast discovery point - a cheap orientation surface - a pointer to better machine-readable endpoints Do **not** claim it boosts ranking by itself. Google has been explicit: AI discovery does not require special AI-only markup. ### 5. AGENTS.md beats hoping skills trigger For coding-agent surfaces, persistent repo context matters more than wishful tool invocation. Vercel's evals are useful here: - skills alone underperformed for general framework guidance - explicit instructions improved triggering, but wording was fragile - compressed `AGENTS.md` / repo-instruction context won for broad, always-on guidance Use: - **AGENTS.md** for persistent repo rules, paths, commands, retrieval hints - **skills** for vertical, action-specific workflows That split matters for pi, OpenCode, and Claude Code. ### 6. Accessibility is agent UX Browser agents and automation stacks lean on the accessibility tree. Prefer: - real `<a>` links with `href` - real `<button>` elements - labels on form controls - `autocomplete` where data entry matters - proper landmarks and heading hierarchy - explicit UI state (`aria-expanded`, `role=status`, `aria-live`) If Playwright can't find it by role or label, an agent harness will likely struggle too. ### 7. Operator UX matters too An operator using an agent harness should not need to reverse-engineer your product. Good patterns: - stable, guessable URLs - obvious markdown twins or negotiated markdown - copyable commands and prompts - JSON responses that advertise next steps (`next_actions` / affordances) - machine-readable discovery routes (`/api`, `/sitemap.md`, etc.) - deterministic MIME types Bad patterns: - opaque blobs of JSON with no next move - downloadable markdown buried behind UI chrome - hidden routes that only work if you already know them - HTML fallback pretending to be markdown - "click around and figure it out" operator flows ## joelclaw Implementation Map When you need concrete evidence, start here. ### Crawl + discovery surfaces - `apps/web/app/robots.ts` - allows crawl globally and advertises both XML and markdown sitemaps - `apps/web/app/sitemap.md/route.ts` - markdown discovery index with posts, ADRs, feeds, and `.md` twins - `apps/web/app/llms.txt/route.ts` - plain-text hint surface pointing agents to `sitemap.md`, `feed.xml`, and markdown access ### Markdown projections - `apps/web/proxy.ts` - canonicalizes `/{slug}.md` and rewrites to the markdown route handler - `apps/web/app/[slug]/md/route.ts` - renders real `text/markdown; charset=utf-8` - prepends agent context - rewrites internal links to other `.md` twins ### Structured discovery + navigation - `apps/web/app/api/route.ts` - API discovery endpoint with `nextActions` - `apps/web/app/api/search/route.ts` - HATEOAS JSON search envelope with markdown snippets - `apps/web/components/clawmail-source-comment.tsx` - source-visible navigation prompt telling agents which endpoints to hit and what MIME types to verify ### Trust + rendering truth - `apps/web/app/[slug]/page.tsx` - cached article shell, JSON-LD injection, visible metadata, copy-for-agent affordance - `apps/web/lib/jsonld.ts` - BlogPosting / Blog / Person / BreadcrumbList helpers - `apps/web/lib/posts.ts` - Convex-canonical content reads; HTML/markdown projections come from one source - `apps/web/components/copy-as-prompt.tsx` - operator-facing affordance to grab a prompt directly into a harness ### Static rendering example, not doctrine - `apps/web/next.config.ts` - `cacheComponents: true` - `apps/web/app/[slug]/page.tsx` - `'use cache'`, `cacheLife`, `cacheTag` for fast static shells with truthful invalidation Use those as examples of the principle: - cached shell - canonical source - small dynamic seams - honest machine projections Not as a claim that Next.js is the only valid way. ## Verification Checklist ### Crawl + indexing ```bash curl -s https://example.com/robots.txt curl -I -A 'OAI-SearchBot/1.3' https://example.com/ curl -I -A 'Googlebot' https://example.com/ ``` Check Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools too. ### Initial-response truth ```bash curl -sL https://example.com/page | rg -n 'important fact|<h1>|<table>|application/ld\+json' lynx -dump https://example.com/page ``` If `curl` cannot see the fact, many agents will not either. ### Markdown / text / JSON projections ```bash curl -I https://example.com/sitemap.md curl -I https://example.com/page.md curl -sS https://example.com/api | jq ``` Verify exact MIME types: - `text/markdown; charset=utf-8` - `text/plain; charset=utf-8` - `application/json; charset=utf-8` If a markdown route returns `text/html`, treat it as broken. ### Accessibility and browser-agent UX - run Lighthouse / axe - inspect the accessibility tree - write Playwright tests with `getByRole` / `getByLabel` - smoke the key flows with a browser agent, not just curl ### Measurement Track: - AI referrers - citation presence for core queries - community mentions / repeated phrasing in the wild - crawl success by user-agent - content refresh cadence (30 / 90 / 180 day review works fine) ## Anti-Patterns - Over-indexing on framework-specific tricks instead of content truth - Claiming `llms.txt` is the magic ranking lever - Shipping agent protocols on top of broken crawlability - Maintaining separate truths for HTML, markdown, and JSON - Returning raw JSON with no next move - Hiding important facts behind client-side interactivity - Assuming accessibility is unrelated to agent automation - Treating MCP as a substitute for honest routes and MIME types ## Use This Mental Shortcut Ask four questions: 1. **Can an indexer find it?** 2. **Can a retriever extract the truth from the first response?** 3. **Can a harness get a cheaper markdown/JSON version without scraping?** 4. **Can an operator or browser agent actually drive the flow without guessing?** If any answer is no, fix that first. That's the work.
عرض على GitHub