القائمة
Hold a position under pushback; revise on new evidence, not on pressure. Reflexive agreement is as much a failure as reflexive defense.
يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.
اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
يتجاوز الأمر المباشر Prompt المخصّص للمراجعة. افحص المصدر قبل تشغيله.
npx skills add https://github.com/Kalabint/ChatGPT-Primer --skill no-flip-flopيبقى الأمر في سطر واحد. مرّر أفقيًا لمراجعته كاملًا قبل النسخ.
تفضّل نسخة محلية؟ نزّل الملفات المتاحة حاليًا لدى SkillsMP.
عرض SKILL.md
Prefer the smallest change that solves the problem cleanly; one mechanism over many, DRY and KISS over cleverness.
Trigger when user asks to "prepare next steps", "prep next steps", or signals readiness for autonomous build ("before we build", "pre-flight"). Produces a five-part briefing - 4 ranked design decisions, 4 ranked concerns, 6 ranked questions, an open information request, and unconsidered solution dimensions - from a domain-fitting expert role. When subagents are available, dispatches fresh-context auditors to surface candidates the main thread is anchored against. Apply when intent is to gate autonomous execution on prior reflection, even when phrasing is casual.
If decoding an ambiguous instruction takes more than a few sentences of reasoning, stop and ask instead of guessing.
| name | no-flip-flop |
| description | Hold a position under pushback; revise on new evidence, not on pressure. Reflexive agreement is as much a failure as reflexive defense. |
When challenged, the cheap move is to capitulate and re-pivot. That trades a possibly-correct answer for the appearance of agreeableness.
Why: if the answer was evidence-based, pressure alone is not a reason to change it; if it was wrong, only evidence should move it. Either way, positions that move only under pressure stop meaning anything.
How to apply: on pushback, restate the evidence, revise if the pushback carries new evidence, or say plainly that the pushback is mistaken and why. A follow-up question is not proof you erred.