github-post

name

github-post

description

Author and submit high-signal, anti-slop GitHub issues (bug reports, feature proposals) and pull requests. Enforces empirical reproduction, literal logs, exact commit/environment targeting, repository convention orientation, structured artifact drafting, and strict anti-AI formatting (strips emojis, pleasantry preambles, gratuitous horizontal rules, and speculative essays). Includes hard stops for target disambiguation and mandatory user approval before submission. Use when triggered via /github-post or when asked to file, draft, format, or submit a GitHub issue, bug report, feature request, or pull request.

GitHub Post (/github-post)

Guidelines, automated orientation tooling, and execution protocols for authoring and submitting high-signal, anti-slop GitHub issues and pull requests without AI formatting noise.

Invocation Style & Slash Command

Trigger the skill using the /github-post slash command or natural language equivalents:

/github-post a PR with these changes
/github-post a new issue requesting the feature we discussed
/github-post a bug report for the crash when passing empty config
/github-post draft a feature proposal for smart dependent versioning in invertase/melos

The 5-Step Workflow

graph TD
    A["1. Intake & Disambiguation<br><b>STOP. DON'T GUESS.</b>"] --> B["2. Repository Orientation<br><code>orient.dart [-R repo]</code>"]
    B --> C["3. Draft into Artifact<br><code>draft_github_[owner]_[repo]_issue.md</code> / <code>draft_github_[owner]_[repo]_pr.md</code>"]
    C --> D["4. Mandatory Approval Gate<br><code>ask_question</code> (Hard Stop)"]
    D --> E["5. Execution & Verification<br><code>gh issue/pr create --body-file</code>"]

---

Step 1: Intake & Disambiguation (STOP. DON'T GUESS.)

The agent MUST have crystal-clear clarity on two fundamental parameters before doing any work:

1. Target Post Type: Is this an Issue (Bug Report, Feature Proposal) or a Pull Request?
2. Target Repository: Which exact GitHub repository (owner/repo)?

[!IMPORTANT] STOP. DON'T GUESS. If the user's intent is ambiguous (e.g. "create a post for this" without specifying Issue vs. PR), or if the target repository cannot be deterministically resolved from the current git checkout, or if multiple remotes/forks exist: The agent MUST STOP and explicitly ask the user for clarification using ask_question or chat before proceeding. Never guess or fabricate targets.

---

Step 2: Repository Orientation

Before drafting, run the bundled orientation tool to inspect the target repository's maintainers, title prefixes, label vocabulary, and native templates:

# For a local git repository checkout:
dart run skills/github-post/bin/orient.dart

# For a remote repository (zero local clone required):
dart run skills/github-post/bin/orient.dart -R invertase/melos

• What it gathers:
  • Active human maintainers and reviewers (filtering out automated bots).
  • Common issue title prefixes (request:, [analyzer], area/foo:).
  • Common PR title prefixes (feat(scope):, fix(scope):, chore:).
  • Repository label vocabulary and detected issue/PR form schemas (.yml field IDs).
• Slop Contagion Guardrail: Use orientation output strictly for taxonomy, prefixes, and template adherence. Do NOT adopt decorative slop, emojis, or conversational fluff found in historical repository posts.

---

Step 3: Draft into an ARTIFACT First

Always draft the complete title and body into a dedicated Markdown artifact in the conversation artifact directory (<appDataDir>/brain/<conversation-id>/) before touching the GitHub CLI, explicitly namespaced by repository:

• For Issues: draft_github_<owner>_<repo>_issue.md (e.g., draft_github_invertase_melos_issue.md or draft_github_kevmoo_kevmoo_skills_issue.md)
• For Pull Requests: draft_github_<owner>_<repo>_pr.md (e.g., draft_github_invertase_melos_pr.md or draft_github_kevmoo_kevmoo_skills_pr.md)

Always provide ArtifactMetadata with RequestFeedback: true so the user can review the rendered draft directly in the UI.

Core Philosophy & Anti-Slop Rules (Negative Invariants)

Maintainers suffer from low-effort LLM fatigue. A good submission takes under 15 seconds to triage. Strictly enforce:

• No Decorative Emojis: Never prefix titles, headers, or bullet points with emojis (🚀, 🐛, 📋, 💡, ✨, ⚠️, 🔍).
• No Gratuitous Dividers: Do not insert --- horizontal rules between every minor section. Standard Markdown headers (###) provide sufficient hierarchy.
• No Conversational Fluff or Pleasantries:
  • Omit opening pleasantries ("While investigating the codebase...", "I hope this helps...").
  • Omit closing pleasantries ("Let me know what you think!", "I would be happy to submit a PR...").
• No Speculative Architecture Essays:
  • In bug reports: State the observed defect, provide exact error logs/repro steps, and limit proposed fixes to 1–2 factual sentences (or omit entirely).
  • In PRs: Explain strictly the rationale ("why") and the isolated diff ("what changed").
• No Inline Multiline Shell Escapes: Never pass multiline Markdown inline via --body "line 1\nline 2". Always use --body-file.

---

Step 4: Mandatory Approval Gate (Hard Stop)

Before running gh issue create or gh pr create, the agent MUST halt execution and prompt the user for explicit confirmation using the ask_question tool.

// Example confirmation prompt
ask_question({
  questions: [
    {
      question: "I have prepared the draft in the artifact. Would you like to create the GitHub Issue now?",
      options: [
        "(Recommended) Yes, create issue via gh issue create",
        "No, keep as draft only"
      ]
    }
  ]
});

• If Approved: Proceed to Step 5.
• If Declined / Paused: Keep the artifact as draft and yield cleanly.

---

Step 5: Execution & Verification

1. Write Body to Temporary File:

   # Extract the body content from the artifact to /tmp/post_body.md
   

2. Execute Submission:

   # For Issues:
   gh issue create -R owner/repo --title "[subsystem] Imperative Title" --body-file /tmp/post_body.md
   rm /tmp/post_body.md
   
   # For Pull Requests:
   gh pr create --title "feat(scope): imperative summary" --body-file /tmp/post_body.md
   rm /tmp/post_body.md
   

3. Verify Output: Confirm the submission succeeded and output the clickable link (https://github.com/owner/repo/issues/123 or https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/123).

---

Title Conventions & Disambiguation

Use concise, imperative titles (≤70 characters):

• When Authoring an Issue: Adopt the repository's issue prefix convention (e.g., request: ..., [subsystem] ..., area/foo: ...).
• When Authoring a PR: Adopt Conventional Commits (feat(scope): ..., fix(scope): ..., refactor(scope): ...) unless the repository explicitly mandates an alternative format.

Post Type	Format Pattern	High-Signal Example	Slop Example to Avoid
Bug	[subsystem] Failure on condition	[analyzer] Crash with NullPointer when config.json is empty	Bug in analyzer or [CRITICAL] System failure
Bug	subsystem: Failure on condition	cli: Flag --output fails when target directory is missing	CLI tool is broken
Feature	[subsystem] Imperative capability	[auth] Support PKCE flow in OAuth2 authentication client	Feature request: make authentication better
Feature	request: Imperative capability	request: avoid cascading releases when constraints allow update	Feature idea for melos
PR	type(scope): imperative summary	feat(orient): add remote repo support and bot filter	Updates and fixes

---

Standard Content Templates

1. Bug Report Template

### Summary
1–2 sentence description of the failure and trigger condition.

### Steps to Reproduce
1. Execute `tool_name --flag value` (or minimal CLI command)
2. Pass input `<repro_input>`

### Observed Behavior
```text
<literal error output, exception message, or raw stack trace>

Expected Behavior

<1–2 sentences describing the expected outcome>

Environment / Target

• Target Commit / Version: <commit_hash>
• Runtime / Platform: <e.g. Linux x86_64, Dart 3.8.0, Node 22>

### 2. Feature Proposal Template

```markdown
### Context & Problem
1–2 sentences explaining what problem needs to be solved.

### Proposed Solution
Concrete description of the proposed interface, behavior, or flag.

### Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] Criterion 1
- [ ] Criterion 2

### Non-Goals
- What this feature explicitly does NOT cover

3. Pull Request Template

### Rationale
1–2 sentences explaining why this change is needed.

### Summary of Changes
- Bulleted description of the concrete code changes
- Touch only what the task requires; no orphaned imports or unrelated diffs

### Verification
- Executed `dart test` with 100% pass
- Verified edge case `<repro_condition>` passes

Fixes #<issue_number>

---

Mapping Standard Sections to GitHub YAML Issue Forms

When a repository uses GitHub Issue Forms (.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/*.yml), the issue body is rendered as sequential H3 markdown sections matching each form element's label: attribute. Map conceptual anti-slop sections to the form's specific fields:

Conceptual Section	Common YAML Field IDs	Rendered Form Heading
Trigger Command	command, repro_command	### Command
Context & Problem	description, context, problem	### Description or ### Context
Reasoning / Impact	reasoning, motivation	### Reasoning
Proposed Solution	solution, proposal, idea	### Proposed Solution
Additional Context	additional_context, comments	### Additional Context (put Acceptance Criteria here)