| name | case-summary |
| description | Generates structured case evaluation summaries from uploaded legal documents. Performs document triage, medical chronology, damages compilation, liability analysis, red flag identification, and valuation. Use when a user uploads case files and requests a case summary, case evaluation, litigation package, or PI case analysis. |
Case Summary
Produces an attorney-ready case evaluation from a collection of legal documents. Five phases: triage, deep-dive, synthesis, red flags, valuation.
Quick Start
- Collect all uploaded case documents.
- Run phases 1-5 sequentially below.
- Format output per references/OUTPUT-TEMPLATE.md.
- Verify against the quality checklist before delivering.
Phase 1: Triage & Classification
Classify each document into: Medical Records, Legal Filings, Correspondence, Financial/Billing, Investigation/Reports, Witness Statements, Photographs/Evidence.
Extract per document: Bates numbers (if present), document type, date, author/source, key parties.
Flag duplicates by comparing hashes, dates, and content overlap.
Phase 2: Document Deep-Dive
Extract structured data by category:
- Incident: date, location, parties, mechanism, contributing factors, witness accounts, official reports
- Medical: provider, date, chief complaint, diagnosis (ICD codes if available), treatment, prognosis, referrals
- Imaging: modality, body part, findings, radiologist impression
- Billing: provider, service dates, CPT codes, billed/paid/adjusted amounts, balance, payer
- Depositions: deponent, date, key admissions, contradictions, credibility observations
Phase 3: Analysis & Synthesis
- Medical chronology — unify all treatment into a single timeline
- Treatment gap analysis — flag gaps >30 days; document stated reasons
- Damages compilation — total economic damages (medical specials, lost wages, future costs); assess non-economic damages
- Liability analysis — map evidence to each liability theory's elements; rate strength
Phase 4: Red Flag Identification
- Medical: pre-existing conditions, treatment gaps, inconsistent complaints, non-compliance
- Liability: comparative fault evidence, conflicting witnesses, spoliation concerns
- Damages: inflated claims, unrelated treatment, lien complications
- Credibility: social media contradictions, inconsistent statements, surveillance footage
Phase 5: Valuation & Recommendations
Provide settlement range (low/mid/high), verdict potential, and net-to-client estimate after liens and fees.
Recommend: immediate actions, case strategy, additional discovery, experts to retain.
Citations
Bates numbers when available: [SMITH_0045-0048]
Fallback format: [Document_Name.pdf, pp. 1-4]
Quality Checklist
Key changes:
- Removed
tags — not part of the Agent Skills spec; discovery relies on description keywords
- Tightened description — third-person, includes clear trigger phrases, under 1024 chars
- Added Quick Start — gives the agent an immediate action sequence before diving into phases
- Eliminated the workflow code block — redundant with the phase headings themselves
- Compressed section headers and prose — removed filler words, shortened labels (e.g., "Medical Chronology" to "Medical", "Diagnostic Imaging" to "Imaging")
- Renamed "Citation Standards" to "Citations" — shorter, same clarity
- Tightened checklist items — fewer words per line, same coverage
