القائمة
Quality gate. 5 parallel agents review changes. All must pass.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
Validate Rust work after substantial Rust code changes by running `just check`, `just clippy`, then `just format`. Use before the final response after a significant Rust implementation or cleanup task; batch edits first instead of running after every small change.
Inspect Rust changes for SQLx queries. Use after modifying Rust code that adds or changes SQLx queries to ensure compile-time SQLx macros are used, run `just prepare_db` for offline query cache, and review queries for performance and security issues.
Build a new AI tool end-to-end — Rust implementation, toolset wiring, infra, schema generation, and frontend UI.
Find all open Dependabot alerts for this repo and create a plan to resolve them using the appropriate package manager overrides (pnpm, bun, npm, cargo).
Dump clean Postgres schema to a file and copy path to clipboard.
Upgrade an AI chat model (fast or good) across backend and frontend.
| name | qc |
| description | Quality gate. 5 parallel agents review changes. All must pass. |
| allowed-tools | Task, Bash, Read, Grep, Glob |
DIFF=$(git diff main)
FILES=$(git diff main --name-only)
TASK="{task description or 'general changes'}"
Read 1-2 unmodified files from same directories for pattern context.
Spawn all 5 in parallel. All output raw JSON only, no markdown.
DIFF: ${DIFF}
- Descriptive naming?
- Errors caught with useful messages?
- No hardcoded values, commented code, debug statements?
- No TODO without ticket ref?
- No obvious bugs?
- No useless comments?
{"pass": bool, "issues": [...]}
DIFF: ${DIFF}
- Is this overcomplicated? Can I solve the same problem in a simpler manner?
- Can I reduce indirection?
- Can I reduce surface area?
- Premature abstraction? Premature Optimization? YAGNI violations?
- Dead code?
- Three similar lines > one abstraction
{"pass": bool, "issues": [...]}
DIFF: ${DIFF}
PATTERNS: ${PATTERN_FILES}
- Matches existing codebase patterns?
- Proper types, no any, no unsafe casts?
- Idiomatic error handling?
- Changes internally consistent?
- Is logic isolated and composable?
- Are there existing tests if neccesary?
{"pass": bool, "issues": [...]}
TASK: ${TASK}
DIFF: ${DIFF}
- Actually solves the problem?
- Edge cases: empty, null, zero, negative, boundaries, concurrency?
- Regression risk: changed signatures, shared state, removed exports?
- Maintains API contracts?
{"pass": bool, "issues": [...]}
TASK: ${TASK}
FILES: ${FILES}
DIFF: ${DIFF}
- Solved the problem or just the symptom?
- Changes unrelated to task?
- Unnecessary refactoring?
{"pass": bool, "issues": [...]}
| Check | Verdict | Issues |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | ✓/✗ | ... |
| Simplification | ✓/✗ | ... |
| Consistency | ✓/✗ | ... |
| Robustness | ✓/✗ | ... |
| Scope | ✓/✗ | ... |
ALL PASS: Ready to commit.
ANY FAIL: List issues, fix them, run /qc again.
Same issue 3x: Escalate to user.