Skip to main content

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
macro-inc/macro
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٢٧ مايو ٢٠٢٦ في ١٩:٥٨
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
٤٬٧١٣
التفرعات
٤٦٠

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
qc
description
Quality gate. 5 parallel agents review changes. All must pass.
allowed-tools
Task, Bash, Read, Grep, Glob
# QC Gate ## Setup ```bash DIFF=$(git diff main) FILES=$(git diff main --name-only) TASK="{task description or 'general changes'}" ``` Read 1-2 unmodified files from same directories for pattern context. ## Agents Spawn all 5 in parallel. All output raw JSON only, no markdown. ### 1: Code Review (sonnet) ``` DIFF: ${DIFF} - Descriptive naming? - Errors caught with useful messages? - No hardcoded values, commented code, debug statements? - No TODO without ticket ref? - No obvious bugs? - No useless comments? {"pass": bool, "issues": [...]} ``` ### 2: Simplification (sonnet) ``` DIFF: ${DIFF} - Is this overcomplicated? Can I solve the same problem in a simpler manner? - Can I reduce indirection? - Can I reduce surface area? - Premature abstraction? Premature Optimization? YAGNI violations? - Dead code? - Three similar lines > one abstraction {"pass": bool, "issues": [...]} ``` ### 3: Consistency (sonnet) ``` DIFF: ${DIFF} PATTERNS: ${PATTERN_FILES} - Matches existing codebase patterns? - Proper types, no any, no unsafe casts? - Idiomatic error handling? - Changes internally consistent? - Is logic isolated and composable? - Are there existing tests if neccesary? {"pass": bool, "issues": [...]} ``` ### 4: Robustness (sonnet) ``` TASK: ${TASK} DIFF: ${DIFF} - Actually solves the problem? - Edge cases: empty, null, zero, negative, boundaries, concurrency? - Regression risk: changed signatures, shared state, removed exports? - Maintains API contracts? {"pass": bool, "issues": [...]} ``` ### 5: Scope (haiku) ``` TASK: ${TASK} FILES: ${FILES} DIFF: ${DIFF} - Solved the problem or just the symptom? - Changes unrelated to task? - Unnecessary refactoring? {"pass": bool, "issues": [...]} ``` ## Results | Check | Verdict | Issues | |-------|---------|--------| | Code Review | ✓/✗ | ... | | Simplification | ✓/✗ | ... | | Consistency | ✓/✗ | ... | | Robustness | ✓/✗ | ... | | Scope | ✓/✗ | ... | **ALL PASS:** Ready to commit. **ANY FAIL:** List issues, fix them, run `/qc` again. **Same issue 3x:** Escalate to user. ## Notes - Invalid JSON? Retry once. Still broken? Mark fail. - Large diffs (>500 lines): run simplification file-by-file.
عرض على GitHub