Skip to main content

systematic-debugging

Root-cause debugging — reproduce, localize, explain, verify — with depth routing and a technique catalogue for stack traces, wolf fence and data-flow tracing. Use when anything errors, crashes or misbehaves, even on a bare pasted trace.

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
MadAppGang/magus
آخر نشاط في المصدر
١٥ سبتمبر ٢٠٢٦ في ٠٢:٤٥
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
١٠
التفرعات
٤

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

مستكشف الملفات
6 ملفات

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
systematic-debugging
description
Root-cause debugging — reproduce, localize, explain, verify — with depth routing and a technique catalogue for stack traces, wolf fence and data-flow tracing. Use when anything errors, crashes or misbehaves, even on a bare pasted trace.
user-invocable
false
# Systematic Debugging One entry point for finding why code is wrong. Read the section you need; each links to a sibling file with the full detail. ## The rule **No fix without a root cause.** If you cannot say which line produces the wrong value and why, you are guessing. A guess that happens to work is a latent bug — it will come back wearing different symptoms. Red flags that you have skipped the diagnosis: changing code to "see if it helps", adding defensive checks around a symptom, fixing the same area twice, or being unable to explain why the fix works. ## Pick a depth | Situation | Do this | |---|---| | Obvious cause, one file, low risk | Fix inline. No ceremony. | | Needs investigation, unclear origin | Follow `workflow.md` | | Production-critical, intermittent, or uncertain | Run `/dev:fix` — full TDD with review gates | `/dev:debug` routes between these three for you. ## The four phases 1. **Reproduce** — a failing case you can run on demand. Without this you cannot tell a fix from a coincidence. 2. **Localize** — narrow to the specific code producing the wrong value. Strategies in `localization.md`. 3. **Explain** — state the mechanism: this input, through this path, yields this wrong output. Then predict what changing it will do. 4. **Verify** — the reproduction now passes, and you can say why. Re-run the surrounding tests; a fix that breaks a neighbour was the wrong fix. Full walkthrough with output schemas: `workflow.md`. ## Reference files | File | Contents | |---|---| | `method.md` | Principles, red flags, hypothesis discipline, strategies by problem type (performance, intermittent, regression, integration) | | `workflow.md` | The phase-by-phase standard workflow with report schemas | | `localization.md` | Three fault-localization strategies — stack-trace grep, BM25 keyword search, AST context expansion — plus context-budget rules and the large-codebase path | | `session-setup.md` | Session directory layout, stack detection, reproduction capture, bug-report schema. Shared by `/dev:debug` and `/dev:fix`. | | `references/techniques.md` | The technique catalogue — stack-trace reading, error categories, wolf fence, data-flow tracing, logging, breakpoints, plus browser and Node.js specifics | **Read `references/techniques.md` in the Localize phase**, when you know which phase you are in and need the concrete move. It is a catalogue, not a method — reading it first invites picking a technique before you have a hypothesis. ## Related - `dev:browser-debugging` — anything involving a browser, console, or network tab - `dev:test-driven-development` — writing the failing test that pins the bug
عرض على GitHub