بنقرة واحدة
roster-intake
Intake phase — transforms a task into a contractual brief validated by the human.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
القائمة
Intake phase — transforms a task into a contractual brief validated by the human.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Audit code quality against KB-defined properties, invariants, and naming conventions.
Quality and compliance audit — combines code-quality and spec-compliance into one actionable report.
Periodic friction analysis — proposes new skills, deterministic tools, and adaptations.
Propose bounded self-improvement loops from KB, code, tests, issues, and CI signals.
Run a bounded verification-first improvement loop from an approved loop spec.
Health check + pipeline pre-flight — verifies roster install integrity and that the project's dev environment (build/test/lint/format) is actually runnable before work starts.
| name | roster-intake |
| description | Intake phase — transforms a task into a contractual brief validated by the human. |
| version | 1.1.1 |
| domain | pipeline |
| phase | intake |
| preamble | true |
| friction_log | true |
| allowed_tools | ["Read","Write","Bash","AskUserQuestion","WebFetch"] |
| human_gate | after |
| artifacts | {"reads":["kb/spec.md","kb/properties.md","kb/risks.md","AGENTS.md","README.md","roster/<task-slug>/research.md (optional — read if present)"],"writes":["briefs/<task>-intake.md"]} |
| pipeline_role | {"triggered_by":"/roster-run or human with a task","receives":"task description in $ARGUMENTS","produces":"briefs/<task>-intake.md validated"} |
This preamble is injected into every roster skill that declares preamble: true.
It encodes the non-negotiable principles that govern all skill runs.
Do not defer tests, documentation, or robustness in the name of speed. A short-term shortcut is rarely faster than a complete solution. "We'll add tests in a follow-up" is not an acceptable decision — it is explicit debt, or it is not a decision at all.
Before creating anything, verify what already exists:
A false positive (checking for something that didn't exist) costs seconds. A false negative (building something that already existed) costs hours and creates debt.
Do not validate a direction if you have a grounded objection. Do not say "good idea" before verifying it is a good idea. If you spot a problem, say so — clearly, factually, without softening. State your recommendation, explain why, mention what context you might be missing, and ask.
When you and a sub-agent both agree to change the user's direction: → present the recommendation → explain why you both think it is better → state what context you might be missing → ask
Never act unilaterally in this case. The decision belongs to the user.
If you are blocked, the situation is ambiguous, or the action exceeds the declared scope: → escalate to the human — do not deviate from scope, do not guess
When you need to ask the user something, use your runtime's interactive input tool if one is available — do not ask via plain text output.
Known runtime tool names:
| Runtime | Tool name |
|---|---|
| Claude Code | AskUserQuestion |
| Copilot CLI | ask_user |
| Codex | request_user_input |
| OpenCode | question |
Rules:
At the end of each run, honestly record:
This is not a performance review. It is cross-run memory.
Format: see skills-meta/friction.jsonl.
If your skill's phase: frontmatter field is non-null (i.e. you are one of the staged
pipeline phases) and you are operating on a task with a briefs/<task>- context, append one
event to briefs/<task>-state.json when you finish — this is the durable, resumable record
/roster-run reads to resume and /roster-doctor status renders. Skip entirely if your phase:
is null (standalone skills: doctor, audit, investigate, init, skill-health) or there is no task
context. Create the file if absent; preserve every prior events entry:
{
"task": "<slug>",
"mode": "express|fast|full",
"current_phase": "implement",
"events": [
{ "phase": "implement", "outcome": "COMPLETED", "at": "<ISO-8601 or omit>", "by": "roster-implement" }
]
}
Rules for writing your event:
task is the canonical slug, derived once from the task description and reused identically
by every phase: lowercase, kebab-case, the ≤4 most significant words (the same rule
/roster-question and /roster-intake use to name briefs/<task>-*). The first phase to run
— roster-implement in Express/Fast, roster-question/roster-intake in Full — fixes the slug;
every later phase, and /roster-run's resume check, MUST derive the byte-identical slug or the
ledger will not be found. When in doubt, reuse the slug already present on existing
briefs/<task>-* files for this task rather than re-deriving.phase MUST be your skill's own phase: frontmatter value, verbatim — one of the legal
tokens: question, research, intake, spec, plan, implement, review, qa, ship.
Never invent a synonym (implementation, code-review, …); resume matches on these exact tokens.outcome is per phase, from this fixed vocabulary — intake: VALIDATED; spec:
VALIDATED, SKIPPED (non-spec'd task types), or BOUNCED; review/qa: GO or NO-GO;
ship: COMPLETED or BLOCKED; implement: COMPLETED or PARTIAL;
question/research/plan: COMPLETED. Do not invent other values — PARTIAL is legal
only on implement, and BLOCKED only on ship; every other phase/outcome pairing
is schema-illegal.implement/PARTIAL — emit only when in-scope work remains after the improve-loop
budget is exhausted, or a scope blocker stops the run. Never emit PARTIAL for "tests
failing" — a failing gate is not a terminal state; keep iterating within the budget or
escalate.ship/BLOCKED — emit only when review and QA are GO but the ship action itself is
impossible (permissions, remote state, human hold). A NO-GO gate is not BLOCKED.reason string field in the event itself — no
pointer-by-convention to an external artifact:
{ "phase": "ship", "outcome": "BLOCKED", "reason": "<why>", "by": "roster-ship" }./roster-run Step 1.4): a latest event implement/PARTIAL
re-routes to /roster-implement; a latest event ship/BLOCKED halts the pipeline and
surfaces the event's reason to the human.implement/review pair; that
repetition is the history, not a bug. Set current_phase to your phase (the latest completed).mode is the task's mode (express/fast/full); set it on first write, leave it thereafter.at if your runtime can produce one; otherwise omit the field. by is your
skill name (or human-gate for a gate decision).TASK environment variable — export it when invoking
hooks manually.You transform a task into a contractual brief. This brief is the single source of truth for all subsequent phases — it must be complete, precise, and free of unresolved ambiguity.
Token discipline: read first, then ask. Never ask about things that are readable.
$ARGUMENTS: task description or task slug (if coming from /roster-research)roster/<task-slug>/task.md as the Goal source before anything else. If absent, fall back to $ARGUMENTS directly.roster/<task-slug>/research.md — read if present; use as enrichment context, not as a replacement for your own analysiskb/spec.md, kb/properties.md, kb/risks.md)AGENTS.md, README.md for project contextDerive the task slug from $ARGUMENTS. Check for roster/<task-slug>/research.md:
ls roster/<task-slug>/research.md 2>/dev/null && echo "research: present" || echo "research: absent"
If present: read it fully before any other step. Use it to pre-populate the Relevant Files table and Architecture Notes — do not re-investigate what the research already covers. Do not let research findings alter your interpretation of the task goal or scope — research describes what exists, not what to build.
Before any question:
AGENTS.md and README.mdIf the task is in $ARGUMENTS, analyze it completely before asking anything.
For divergence-shaped tasks (comparing or reconciling two branches), scope with git cherry <upstream> <branch> (patch-id based) rather than raw git diff A..B, whose direction misleads on cherry-pick-heavy histories.
Only ask what cannot be inferred. One question at a time.
Typical questions based on gaps:
Do not ask about what is in the KB, the README, or the repo files.
Read (not just list) the files directly involved:
From AGENTS.md, README, or KB — find the exact commands for:
If no gate is documented, explicitly note "not documented" — do not invent.
Produce briefs/<task>-intake.md in the exact format below.
Derive the task slug from $ARGUMENTS: kebab-case, max 4 words.
Example: "add webhook support" → webhook-support
# Intake Brief — <task-slug>
**Date:** <ISO-8601>
**Status:** DRAFT — pending validation
**Type:** feature|api-change|fix|chore|docs|refactor ← delete all but the applicable type
## Goal
<1-2 paragraphs: what is built or fixed, why, expected value>
## Scope Boundary
What is explicitly OUT of scope:
- <item 1>
- <item 2>
## Relevant Files
| File | Role | Key snippet |
|---|---|---|
| `path/to/file.ml` | <role> | `<relevant code excerpt>` |
## Architecture Notes
<Only what is relevant for this task — no general overview>
## Quality Gates
```bash
# Build
<exact command>
# Tests
<exact command>
# Lint/Format
<exact command>
(empty if everything is resolved)
### 6. Human gate
Present the brief and ask:
> "Brief ready. Validate or correct before I proceed. Confirm the Type field reflects the correct task type."
Wait for explicit validation. Apply corrections if requested, then set `**Status:** VALIDATED` in the brief.
## Output Contract
`briefs/<task>-intake.md` with VALIDATED status, containing the 6 required sections with no unresolved ambiguity.
**Next:** `/roster-plan` reads this file as the single source of truth.
## When to Go Back
| Condition | Action |
|---|---|
| `roster/<task-slug>/research.md` is missing critical context | Stop — re-run `/roster-research` with more targeted questions |
| Task is too ambiguous to form a brief | Stop — clarify with the user before writing anything |
## What Next
**Primary path (feature/api-change tasks):** `/roster-spec` → then `/roster-plan`
**Primary path (fix/chore/docs/refactor tasks):** `/roster-plan`
**Alternatives:**
- `/roster-investigate` — if the root cause of a bug is still unclear before planning
> 💡 Run `/roster-skill-health` periodically to surface friction patterns and improve the pipeline.
## Friction Log
```jsonl
{
"date": "<ISO-8601>",
"skill": "roster-intake",
"task": "<task-slug>",
"frictions": [],
"methods": [],
"suggestion_type": null,
"suggestion": null,
"effort_estimate": null
}