| name | alphagenome-variant-effects |
| description | Use Google DeepMind AlphaGenome to predict tissue-aware regulatory effects of DNA sequence variants across expression, splicing, chromatin, and contact-map outputs. Use when prioritizing noncoding variants, comparing reference and alternate alleles, visualizing predicted regulatory changes, or designing focused AlphaGenome API analyses. |
AlphaGenome Variant Effects
Use AlphaGenome for mechanistic prioritization of regulatory variants. Do not convert its predictions directly into clinical classifications.
Workflow
- Confirm the biological question, supported species and reference assembly, coordinate convention, and normalized reference/alternate allele.
- Select a sequence interval that contains the relevant regulatory context without exceeding the model limit of one million base pairs.
- Select tissue or cell context with ontology terms. Document why each term is biologically relevant.
- Request only the output modalities needed for the hypothesis, such as RNA expression, splicing, chromatin accessibility, histone marks, transcription-factor binding, or chromatin contacts.
- Use
predict_variant for reference-versus-alternate comparisons and preserve both outputs.
- Derive interpretable summaries:
- direction and magnitude of predicted change;
- affected tracks, genes, splice junctions, or regulatory elements;
- consistency across related tissues and nearby windows.
- Visualize reference and alternate tracks on the same axes and annotate the variant position.
- Compare predictions with population frequency, ClinVar or disease evidence, QTLs, epigenomic tracks, and functional assays.
Scale and Access
- Obtain an AlphaGenome API key and install the official client.
- Use the API for focused small-to-medium analyses. The official documentation states it is not intended for analyses requiring more than roughly one million predictions.
- Check the current terms before commercial use. The public API is offered for non-commercial use subject to Google DeepMind terms.
- Use the repository's BioMCP integration only when MCP orchestration is useful; use the official client for direct control and reproducible notebooks.
Guardrails
- Do not infer causality from a predicted track change alone.
- Do not treat absent predicted effects as proof of benignity.
- Separate model outputs from external annotations in reports.
- Preserve API/client version, interval, ontology terms, requested outputs, and visualization settings.
- Require orthogonal evidence for clinical, therapeutic, or genome-editing decisions.
Output Contract
Return a variant-centered report containing normalized input, biological context, requested modalities, reference-versus-alternate effects, supporting and conflicting evidence, limitations, and recommended validation.
Read references/operations.md for installation, a minimal API pattern, interpretation guidance, and canonical sources.