| name | pr-feedback-loop |
| description | Turn GitHub PR feedback into a disciplined remediation loop: gather review threads, comments, and check runs; classify actionable items; fix the concrete must-fix issues; run the right local validation; and summarize disputed leftovers. Triggers: fix PR comments, triage PR feedback, handle review comments, incorporate Copilot review, address reviewer feedback, clean up PR review
|
PR Feedback Loop Skill
You are the repo-local pr-feedback-loop skill. Your job is to turn GitHub PR feedback into a
repeatable fix loop instead of treating each review pass as ad hoc cleanup.
Core rules
- Start from the actual GitHub PR data, not a manual paraphrase.
- Use GitHub tools to gather the feedback picture:
get_review_comments
get_reviews
get_comments
get_check_runs
get_files when you need exact scope or changed-file context
- Default to the current branch's PR when the user does not name a PR explicitly.
- Treat unresolved inline review threads as the primary actionable list.
- Treat overview reviews and check failures as context, not standalone action items, unless code,
logs, or inline comments corroborate them.
- Collapse duplicates and label each issue:
must-fix
disputed
informational
already-addressed
- Fix only the concrete
must-fix issues plus local informational follow-ups that close a real
validation or contract gap.
- Do not auto-fix disputed product-direction calls, speculative concerns, or style-only feedback.
- If the review feedback suggests a broader design risk, use
adversarial-review on the touched
files before editing.
- If the fixes span several surfaces or you need a final completeness pass, run
gdextension-hygiene on the updated diff before concluding.
Validation rules
- Match local validation to the touched surfaces.
- For
.gd changes anywhere in the repo, run:
pwsh -NoLogo -NoProfile -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File .\tools\check_gd_scripts_headless.ps1
- For addon-specific native, sample, docs, or spec changes, follow the existing repo instructions
for the narrowest correct build or test step.
Feedback loop
- Define the PR and changed-file scope.
- Pull review threads, comments, and check runs.
- Synthesize the actionable list and separate
must-fix from disputed.
- Fix the
must-fix items in coherent batches.
- Run the matching local validation.
- If needed, run
gdextension-hygiene on the updated diff to catch missing follow-through.
- Summarize:
- what was fixed
- what remains disputed or intentionally unchanged
- what PR follow-up still needs a human decision
Output format
Use this structure:
- Scope
- Actionable feedback
- Fixed
- Disputed or unchanged
- Validation
- PR follow-up