Skip to main content

trellis-break-loop

Deep bug analysis to break the fix-forget-repeat cycle. Analyzes root cause category, why fixes failed, prevention mechanisms, and captures knowledge into specs. Use after fixing a bug to prevent the same class of bugs.

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
mindfold-ai/Trellis
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٢٦ يونيو ٢٠٢٦ في ٠٤:١٢
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
١٤٬٩٥٥
التفرعات
٨٦٢

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
trellis-break-loop
description
Deep bug analysis to break the fix-forget-repeat cycle. Analyzes root cause category, why fixes failed, prevention mechanisms, and captures knowledge into specs. Use after fixing a bug to prevent the same class of bugs.
# Break the Loop - Deep Bug Analysis When debug is complete, use this for deep analysis to break the "fix bug -> forget -> repeat" cycle. --- ## Analysis Framework Analyze the bug you just fixed from these 5 dimensions: ### 1. Root Cause Category Which category does this bug belong to? | Category | Characteristics | Example | |----------|-----------------|---------| | **A. Missing Spec** | No documentation on how to do it | New feature without checklist | | **B. Cross-Layer Contract** | Interface between layers unclear | API returns different format than expected | | **C. Change Propagation Failure** | Changed one place, missed others | Changed function signature, missed call sites | | **D. Test Coverage Gap** | Unit test passes, integration fails | Works alone, breaks when combined | | **E. Implicit Assumption** | Code relies on undocumented assumption | Timestamp seconds vs milliseconds | ### 2. Why Fixes Failed (if applicable) If you tried multiple fixes before succeeding, analyze each failure: - **Surface Fix**: Fixed symptom, not root cause - **Incomplete Scope**: Found root cause, didn't cover all cases - **Tool Limitation**: grep missed it, type check wasn't strict - **Mental Model**: Kept looking in same layer, didn't think cross-layer ### 3. Prevention Mechanisms What mechanisms would prevent this from happening again? | Type | Description | Example | |------|-------------|---------| | **Documentation** | Write it down so people know | Update thinking guide | | **Architecture** | Make the error impossible structurally | Type-safe wrappers | | **Compile-time** | Strict type checking, no escape hatches | Signature change causes compile error | | **Runtime** | Monitoring, alerts, scans | Detect orphan entities | | **Test Coverage** | E2E tests, integration tests | Verify full flow | | **Code Review** | Checklist, PR template | "Did you check X?" | ### 4. Systematic Expansion What broader problems does this bug reveal? - **Similar Issues**: Where else might this problem exist? - **Design Flaw**: Is there a fundamental architecture issue? - **Process Flaw**: Is there a development process improvement? - **Knowledge Gap**: Is the team missing some understanding? ### 5. Knowledge Capture Solidify insights into the system: - [ ] Update `.trellis/spec/guides/` thinking guides - [ ] Update relevant `.trellis/spec/` docs - [ ] Create issue record (if applicable) - [ ] Create feature ticket for root fix - [ ] Update check guidelines if needed --- ## Output Format Please output analysis in this format: ```markdown ## Bug Analysis: [Short Description] ### 1. Root Cause Category - **Category**: [A/B/C/D/E] - [Category Name] - **Specific Cause**: [Detailed description] ### 2. Why Fixes Failed (if applicable) 1. [First attempt]: [Why it failed] 2. [Second attempt]: [Why it failed] ... ### 3. Prevention Mechanisms | Priority | Mechanism | Specific Action | Status | |----------|-----------|-----------------|--------| | P0 | ... | ... | TODO/DONE | ### 4. Systematic Expansion - **Similar Issues**: [List places with similar problems] - **Design Improvement**: [Architecture-level suggestions] - **Process Improvement**: [Development process suggestions] ### 5. Knowledge Capture - [ ] [Documents to update / tickets to create] ``` --- ## Core Philosophy > **The value of debugging is not in fixing the bug, but in making this class of bugs never happen again.** Three levels of insight: 1. **Tactical**: How to fix THIS bug 2. **Strategic**: How to prevent THIS CLASS of bugs 3. **Philosophical**: How to expand thinking patterns 30 minutes of analysis saves 30 hours of future debugging. --- ## After Analysis: Immediate Actions **IMPORTANT**: After completing the analysis above, you MUST immediately: 1. **Update spec/guides** - Don't just list TODOs, actually update the relevant files: - If it's a cross-platform issue → update `cross-platform-thinking-guide.md` - If it's a cross-layer issue → update `cross-layer-thinking-guide.md` - If it's a code reuse issue → update `code-reuse-thinking-guide.md` - If it's domain-specific → update `backend/*.md` or `frontend/*.md` 2. **Sync templates** - After updating `.trellis/spec/`, sync to `src/templates/markdown/spec/` 3. **Commit the spec updates** - This is the primary output, not just the analysis text > **The analysis is worthless if it stays in chat. The value is in the updated specs.**
عرض على GitHub