| name | additive-manufacturing |
| description | Additive manufacturing (3D printing) — process selection (FDM/SLA/SLS/DMLS/LPBF), design for AM (DfAM), topology optimization, support structures, material properties, post-processing, tolerances. |
| metadata | {"priority":7,"promptSignals":{"phrases":["additive manufacturing","3D printing","FDM","SLS","DMLS","LPBF","design for AM","DfAM","topology optimization","metal printing"],"minScore":3}} |
Additive Manufacturing — Complete Skill
Process Comparison
| Process | Material | Layer [μm] | Tolerance | Surface Ra | Strength | Cost |
|---|
| FDM (Fused Deposition) | Thermoplastic (PLA/ABS/PETG/Nylon/PEEK) | 100-300 | ±0.3-1mm | 10-30 μm | 60-80% of bulk | Low |
| SLA (Stereolithography) | Photopolymer resin | 25-100 | ±0.1-0.2mm | 1-5 μm | 80-90% | Medium |
| SLS (Selective Laser Sintering) | Nylon PA12, PA11, TPU | 80-120 | ±0.2-0.3mm | 8-15 μm | 85-95% | Medium |
| DMLS/LPBF (Laser PBF) | Ti, Al, Inconel, SS, CoCr | 20-60 | ±0.05-0.15mm | 6-15 μm | 95-110% bulk | High |
| EBM (Electron Beam PBF) | Ti6Al4V, CoCr | 50-100 | ±0.1-0.3mm | 20-35 μm | ~bulk Ti | High |
| DED (Directed Energy Dep.) | Metals, alloys | 200-1000 | ±0.5-1mm | 20-50 μm | ~bulk | Medium |
| Binder Jetting | Metals, sand, ceramics | 50-200 | ±0.1-0.3mm | 5-10 μm | 90-95% (sintered) | Medium |
| Material Jetting (PolyJet) | Photopolymer, wax | 16-30 | ±0.05mm | 1-3 μm | Moderate | High |
Design for AM (DfAM) Rules
Overhangs and Support Structures
Self-supporting angles:
FDM: ≤45° from horizontal (some machines to 60° with cooling)
LPBF/DMLS: ≤45° from horizontal (rule of thumb); depends on material
Below threshold → requires support structures
Minimize supports (expensive to remove, leaves marks):
- Orient part to minimize overhanging surfaces
- Self-supporting features: domes (hemisphere), diamond/teardrop holes (vs. circular)
- Teardrop hole: point at top, circular at bottom → self-supporting
Minimum Feature Sizes
FDM: wall min = 0.4mm (1 nozzle width); hole min = 2mm
SLS: wall min = 0.8-1.5mm; hole min = 1.5mm
LPBF: wall min = 0.2-0.4mm; hole min = 0.5mm; lattice struts min = 0.3mm
SLA: wall min = 0.3mm; feature min = 0.1mm
Holes and Channels
Horizontal holes (FDM): require supports below; use diamond/teardrop profile
Vertical holes: accurate, no support needed
Internal channels: use lattice support (LPBF) or design with self-supporting cross-section
Fit and Clearance
Clearance for moving parts:
FDM: 0.3-0.5mm clearance between mating parts
SLS: 0.3-0.5mm
LPBF: 0.1-0.2mm (more accurate)
Pin holes: typically under-size by 0.1-0.2mm → drill/ream to final size after printing
Wall Thickness
FDM: min 0.8-1.5mm (2-4 perimeters)
SLS: min 1mm; recommended 2-3mm for structural
LPBF: min 0.4-1mm; thin walls risk distortion
No maximum (unlike injection molding) — but thin = risky, thick = expensive
Text and Surface Features
Embossed text: min 0.5mm height (FDM), 0.3mm (SLA)
Engraved: min 0.5mm wide, 0.4mm deep
Mark part ID in XY plane (not Z) for best resolution
Topology Optimization
SIMP Method (Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization)
Minimize: C = {U}ᵀ[K]{U} (compliance = strain energy)
Subject to: V_material ≤ V_frac × V_total (volume fraction constraint)
Density ρ_e ∈ [0,1] per element (0=void, 1=solid)
Penalized stiffness: E_e = ρ_e^p × E₀ (p=3 pushes toward 0/1 distribution)
Iterate: sensitivity-based update → grey elements → solid/void
Tools: ANSYS Topology Optimization, Altair OptiStruct, nTopology, Simulia TOSCA
SolidWorks Topology Study (easy entry)
Design Space and Load Cases
Define: design domain, keep-out regions (holes for fasteners, interfaces)
Multiple load cases: minimize compliance for all loads simultaneously
Manufacturing constraints: min member size, symmetry, draw direction (avoids unmakeable geometry)
Interpretation and Smoothing
Raw TO result: jagged, impossible to manufacture → smooth and interpret
Smoothing: isosurface extraction, remesh, B-spline fit
Validate: re-run FEA on smoothed geometry → check stress ≤ allowable
Material Properties — AM vs. Wrought
Metal AM (LPBF)
Generally anisotropic: Z-direction (build direction) weaker
Ti-6Al-4V LPBF (HIP): Sy=830 MPa, Su=900 MPa, El=12% (equivalent to wrought after HIP)
Ti-6Al-4V LPBF (no HIP): Sy=960 MPa, Su=1050 MPa, El=8% (higher strength, lower ductility)
Inconel 625: Sy=620 MPa, Su=890 MPa (similar to wrought)
316L SS: Sy=480 MPa, Su=680 MPa
Fatigue (LPBF): lower than wrought unless:
- Post-machined surface (eliminates surface defects)
- HIP'd (closes internal pores, gas bubbles)
- Shot peened (compressive residual stress)
Without post-processing: AM fatigue ~60-80% of wrought
Polymer AM (FDM)
PLA: Sy≈65 MPa, E≈3.5 GPa (brittle, poor temperature resistance)
PETG: Sy≈50 MPa, E≈2.0 GPa (tougher than PLA, chemical resistant)
ABS: Sy≈40 MPa, E≈2.1 GPa (common, warps)
Nylon PA12: Sy≈48 MPa, E≈1.6 GPa (flexible, wear-resistant)
PEEK: Sy≈100 MPa, E≈4.0 GPa (high temperature, chemical resistance, expensive)
Carbon-fiber filled: 2-4× stiffer, often printed with continuous fiber (Markforged)
Post-Processing
Metal AM
- Support removal: wire EDM, milling
- HIP (Hot Isostatic Pressing): 100-200 MPa inert gas + high temp → close pores → improve fatigue
- Stress relief / solution anneal: reduce residual stress from rapid cooling
- Machining: critical surfaces (bores, threads, sealing faces) always CNC machined
- Surface finish: bead blast, electropolish, hand polish
- NDT: CT scan (detect internal porosity), PAUT for structural parts
Polymer FDM
- Support removal
- Sanding, priming, painting
- Acetone smoothing (ABS only)
- Epoxy coating (strengthen/seal)
Design Rules Summary
✓ Orient critical surfaces in XY plane
✓ Avoid horizontal overhangs >45° without supports
✓ Integrate complexity: hollow sections, internal channels, organic topology
✓ Lattice structures: reduce weight, control stiffness
✗ Don't directly copy casting/forging/machining designs — redesign for AM
✗ Don't use AM if wrought part is cheaper and same weight (AM advantage is complexity)
Cost Drivers
Metal LPBF: material cost ($50-500/kg powder), machine time (€200-1000/hr), post-processing
Break-even vs. machining: complex parts with internal features, <50 qty
Break-even vs. casting: complex, low volume (<500 parts)
Output
Provide: process recommendation for application, DfAM rule checklist, orientation recommendation, support strategy, post-processing steps, expected mechanical properties (Sy, Su, El), tolerance achievable [mm].