| name | automation-audit-ops |
| description | Evidence-first automation inventory and overlap audit workflow for ecc. Use when the user wants to know which jobs, hooks, connectors, MCP servers, or wrappers are live, broken, redundant, or missing before fixing anything. |
| origin | ecc |
Automation Audit Ops
Use this when the user asks what automations are live, which jobs are broken, where overlap exists, or what tooling and connectors are actually doing useful work right now.
This is an audit-first operator skill. The job is to produce an evidence-backed inventory and a keep / merge / cut / fix-next recommendation set before rewriting anything.
Skill Stack
Pull these ecc-native skills into the workflow when relevant:
workspace-surface-audit for connector, MCP, hook, and app inventoryknowledge-ops when the audit needs to reconcile live repo truth with durable contextgithub-ops when the answer depends on CI, scheduled workflows, issues, or PR automationecc-tools-cost-audit when the real problem is webhook fanout, queued jobs, or billing burn in the sibling app reporesearch-ops when local inventory must be compared against current platform support or public docsverification-loop for proving post-fix state instead of relying on assumed recovery
When to Use
- user asks "what automations do I have", "what is live", "what is broken", or "what overlaps"
- the task spans cron jobs, GitHub Actions, local hooks, MCP servers, connectors, wrappers, or app integrations
- the user wants to know what was ported from another agent system and what still needs to be rebuilt inside ecc
- the workspace has accumulated multiple ways to do the same thing and the user wants one canonical lane
Guardrails
- start read-only unless the user explicitly asked for fixes
- separate:
- configured
- authenticated
- recently verified
- stale or broken
- missing entirely
- do not claim a tool is live just because a skill or config references it
- do not merge or delete overlapping surfaces until the evidence table exists
Workflow
1. Inventory the real surface
Read the current live surface before theorizing:
- repo hooks and local hook scripts
- GitHub Actions and scheduled workflows
- MCP configs and enabled servers
- connector- or app-backed integrations
- wrapper scripts and repo-specific automation entrypoints
Group them by surface:
- local runtime
- repo CI / automation
- connected external systems
- messaging / notifications
- billing / customer operations
- research / monitoring
2. Classify each item by live state
For every surfaced automation, mark:
- configured
- authenticated
- recently verified
- stale or broken
- missing
Then classify the problem type:
- active breakage
- auth outage
- stale status
- overlap or redundancy
- missing capability
3. Trace the proof path
Back every important claim with a concrete source:
- file path
- workflow run
- hook log
- config entry
- recent command output
- exact failure signature
If the current state is ambiguous, say so directly instead of pretending the audit is complete.
4. End with keep / merge / cut / fix-next
For each overlapping or suspect surface, return one call:
The value is in collapsing noisy automation into one canonical ecc lane, not in preserving every historical path.
Output Format
CURRENT SURFACE
- automation
- source
- live state
- proof
FINDINGS
- active breakage
- overlap
- stale status
- missing capability
RECOMMENDATION
- keep
- merge
- cut
- fix next
NEXT ecc MOVE
- exact skill / hook / workflow / app lane to strengthen
Pitfalls
- do not answer from memory when the live inventory can be read
- do not treat "present in config" as "working"
- do not fix lower-value redundancy before naming the broken high-signal path
- do not widen the task into a repo rewrite if the user asked for inventory first
Verification
- important claims cite a live proof path
- each surfaced automation is labeled with a clear live-state category
- the final recommendation distinguishes keep / merge / cut / fix-next
