| name | hiring-scorecard |
| description | Creates structured interview scorecards with competency ratings, question banks, and evaluation rubrics for objective hiring decisions. |
| allowed-tools | Read Write Glob |
| metadata | {"author":"matthewhitcham","version":"1.0"} |
Hiring Scorecard
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when you need to:
- Create a structured scorecard for evaluating job candidates consistently
- Define competency ratings and evaluation criteria for a specific role
- Build question banks aligned to role requirements
- Remove bias from hiring decisions with objective scoring
DO NOT use this skill for writing job descriptions, sourcing candidates, or building interview question banks (use interview-question-bank for that). This is for the evaluation scorecard used during and after interviews.
Core Principle
HIRING WITHOUT A SCORECARD IS HIRING ON VIBES — A STRUCTURED SCORECARD FORCES OBJECTIVE EVALUATION AGAINST ROLE-SPECIFIC CRITERIA, REDUCING BIAS AND BAD HIRES.
Phase 1: Role Requirements
Define what the role needs before building the scorecard.
Required Inputs
| Input | What to Ask | Default |
|---|
| Role title | "What role are you hiring for?" | No default |
| Employment type | "Full-time, part-time, or contractor?" | Contractor |
| Top 3 outcomes | "What does this person need to achieve in the first 90 days?" | No default |
| Must-have skills | "What skills are non-negotiable?" | No default |
| Nice-to-have skills | "What skills would be a bonus but not required?" | No default |
| Culture traits | "What working style or personality traits matter for this role?" | Self-starter, communicative |
Competency Framework
## Role Competencies: [Role Title]
### Must-Have (Weighted 70%)
| Competency | Description | How to Assess |
|-----------|-------------|---------------|
| [Skill 1] | [What good looks like] | [Interview question / portfolio / test] |
| [Skill 2] | [What good looks like] | [Assessment method] |
| [Skill 3] | [What good looks like] | [Assessment method] |
### Nice-to-Have (Weighted 20%)
| Competency | Description | How to Assess |
|-----------|-------------|---------------|
| [Skill 4] | [What good looks like] | [Assessment method] |
### Culture Fit (Weighted 10%)
| Trait | Description | How to Assess |
|-------|-------------|---------------|
| [Trait 1] | [Observable behavior] | [Behavioral question] |
GATE: Confirm competencies before building the scorecard.
Phase 2: Build Scorecard
Create the evaluation instrument.
Scorecard Template
## Hiring Scorecard: [Role Title]
**Candidate:** _______________
**Interviewer:** _______________
**Date:** _______________
**Interview stage:** [Screen / Technical / Final]
### Competency Ratings
| # | Competency | Weight | Score (1-5) | Weighted Score | Notes / Evidence |
|---|-----------|--------|-------------|---------------|-----------------|
| 1 | [Must-have 1] | [%] | [ ] | [ ] | |
| 2 | [Must-have 2] | [%] | [ ] | [ ] | |
| 3 | [Must-have 3] | [%] | [ ] | [ ] | |
| 4 | [Nice-to-have 1] | [%] | [ ] | [ ] | |
| 5 | [Culture trait 1] | [%] | [ ] | [ ] | |
### Scoring Guide
| Score | Definition |
|-------|-----------|
| 1 | No evidence of competency — significant concern |
| 2 | Below expectations — gaps in critical areas |
| 3 | Meets expectations — adequate for the role |
| 4 | Above expectations — strong evidence of competency |
| 5 | Exceptional — among the best candidates seen for this competency |
### Overall Assessment
**Total weighted score:** _____ / 5.0
**Recommendation:** [ ] Strong Hire [ ] Hire [ ] No Hire [ ] Strong No Hire
**Top strengths:**
1.
2.
**Top concerns:**
1.
2.
**Additional notes:**
**Signature:** _______________ **Date:** ___
Red Flag Checklist
## Automatic Disqualifiers
- [ ] Cannot verify claimed experience or credentials
- [ ] Disrespectful to interviewer or staff
- [ ] Unable to articulate relevant experience clearly
- [ ] Scores 1 on any must-have competency
- [ ] [Role-specific red flag]
GATE: Present scorecard for review before adding interview questions.
Phase 3: Align Questions
Map interview questions to scorecard competencies.
Question-Competency Map
## Interview Question Map
| Competency | Question | What to Listen For | Red Flag |
|-----------|---------|-------------------|----------|
| [Skill 1] | "Tell me about a time you [relevant scenario]" | [Specific evidence of competency] | [Vague or evasive answer] |
| [Skill 2] | "How would you approach [role-specific challenge]?" | [Structured thinking, relevant tools] | [No framework, just buzzwords] |
| [Culture] | "Describe your ideal working relationship with a manager/client" | [Alignment with your working style] | [Misalignment on communication or autonomy] |
Scoring During Interview
- Write notes as the candidate speaks, not after
- Score each competency immediately after the relevant question
- Record specific examples and quotes, not general impressions
- Do not discuss scores with other interviewers until all scorecards are complete
Phase 4: Decision Framework
Use scorecards to make consistent hiring decisions.
Decision Matrix
## Hiring Decision Guide
| Weighted Score | Recommendation | Action |
|---------------|---------------|--------|
| 4.5-5.0 | Strong Hire | Make an offer quickly — this candidate will have other options |
| 3.5-4.4 | Hire | Solid candidate — proceed with offer |
| 2.5-3.4 | Maybe | Additional assessment needed — second interview or skills test |
| Below 2.5 | No Hire | Pass — do not lower the bar |
Multi-Interviewer Calibration
If multiple people interview the same candidate:
- Each interviewer completes their scorecard independently
- Compare scores — discuss any competency where scores differ by 2+ points
- Average the final scores
- The hiring manager makes the final call
Post-Hire Scorecard Validation
At 90 days, compare the hiring scorecard predictions to actual performance:
- Were the identified strengths confirmed?
- Did any concerns materialize?
- Use this data to calibrate future scorecards
Anti-Patterns
- No evidence, just feelings — "I liked them" is not a hiring decision. Every score needs a specific example from the interview.
- Halo effect — one strong answer biases all other scores upward. Score each competency independently.
- Lowering the bar — if no candidate scores above 3.0, the role is unclear or the pipeline needs improvement. Do not hire a 2.5.
- Ignoring red flags — a 4.5 score with one automatic disqualifier is still a no hire. Red flags are non-negotiable.
- Skipping the scorecard for "obvious" hires — even obviously strong candidates should be scored. It validates the decision and creates documentation.
Recovery
- User has never used a scorecard: Start simple — 3 must-have competencies scored 1-5. Add complexity after the first hire.
- All candidates score similarly: The questions may not be differentiating enough. Add a practical test or more specific behavioral questions.
- Interviewer bias suspected: Require written evidence for every score. "They seem nice" is not evidence. "They described a specific project where they..." is.
- User is hiring quickly and wants to skip the process: A 15-minute scorecard review saves weeks of dealing with a bad hire. Speed on hiring is expensive.
- Candidate scored well but is underperforming: Review which competencies were misjudged and refine the assessment methods for those areas.
