بنقرة واحدة
decision-tracing
Trace agent decision-making, tool selection, and reasoning chains
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
القائمة
Trace agent decision-making, tool selection, and reasoning chains
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Instrument safety checks, content filters, and guardrails for agent outputs
Strategies for evaluating agents in production - sampling, baselines, and regression detection
Track prompt versions, A/B test variants, and measure prompt performance
Instrument error handling, retries, fallbacks, and failure patterns
Instrument evaluation metrics, quality scores, and feedback loops
Instrument human approval workflows, feedback loops, and escalations
| name | decision-tracing |
| description | Trace agent decision-making, tool selection, and reasoning chains |
| triggers | ["decision tracing","agent reasoning","tool selection","why did agent","agent decisions","chain of thought"] |
| priority | 1 |
Understand why agents make decisions, not just what they did.
For every agent action, capture:
This enables debugging failures and optimizing decision quality.
# P0 - Always capture
span.set_attribute("decision.type", "tool_selection")
span.set_attribute("decision.chosen", "web_search")
span.set_attribute("decision.confidence", 0.85)
# P1 - For analysis
span.set_attribute("decision.options", ["web_search", "calculator", "code_exec"])
span.set_attribute("decision.options_count", 3)
span.set_attribute("decision.reasoning", "User asked about current events")
# P2 - For debugging
span.set_attribute("decision.context_tokens", 1500)
span.set_attribute("decision.model", "claude-3-5-sonnet")
from langfuse.decorators import observe, langfuse_context
@observe(name="decision.tool_selection")
def trace_tool_selection(
response,
available_tools: list[str],
) -> dict:
"""Trace which tool was selected and why."""
# Extract tool choice from response
tool_calls = response.tool_calls or []
chosen_tools = [tc.function.name for tc in tool_calls]
langfuse_context.update_current_observation(
metadata={
"decision_type": "tool_selection",
"available_tools": available_tools,
"chosen_tools": chosen_tools,
"num_tools_called": len(chosen_tools),
"called_parallel": len(chosen_tools) > 1,
}
)
# If model provided reasoning (e.g., in <thinking> tags)
if hasattr(response, "thinking"):
langfuse_context.update_current_observation(
metadata={
"reasoning_provided": True,
"reasoning_length": len(response.thinking),
}
)
return {
"chosen": chosen_tools,
"available": available_tools,
}
@observe(name="decision.routing")
def trace_routing_decision(
task: str,
routed_to: str,
available_agents: list[str],
routing_scores: dict[str, float] = None,
) -> dict:
"""Trace agent/model routing decisions."""
langfuse_context.update_current_observation(
metadata={
"decision_type": "routing",
"routed_to": routed_to,
"available_agents": available_agents,
"scores": routing_scores,
"top_score": max(routing_scores.values()) if routing_scores else None,
"score_margin": calculate_margin(routing_scores) if routing_scores else None,
}
)
return {"routed_to": routed_to}
def route_to_agent(task: str) -> str:
"""Route task to appropriate agent."""
# Classifier-based routing
scores = {
"researcher": classify_score(task, "research"),
"coder": classify_score(task, "coding"),
"writer": classify_score(task, "writing"),
}
chosen = max(scores, key=scores.get)
trace_routing_decision(
task=task,
routed_to=chosen,
available_agents=list(scores.keys()),
routing_scores=scores,
)
return chosen
@observe(name="decision.reasoning")
def trace_reasoning_chain(
response,
structured_output: bool = False,
) -> dict:
"""Extract and trace reasoning from agent responses."""
# Parse thinking/reasoning from response
reasoning = extract_reasoning(response)
langfuse_context.update_current_observation(
metadata={
"decision_type": "reasoning",
"has_reasoning": reasoning is not None,
"reasoning_steps": count_steps(reasoning) if reasoning else 0,
"reasoning_length": len(reasoning) if reasoning else 0,
}
)
# If structured output, trace the decision structure
if structured_output and hasattr(response, "parsed"):
langfuse_context.update_current_observation(
metadata={
"structured_decision": True,
"decision_fields": list(response.parsed.__fields__.keys()),
}
)
return {
"reasoning": reasoning,
"steps": count_steps(reasoning) if reasoning else 0,
}
@observe(name="agent.run")
def run_agent_with_decision_tracing(task: str) -> str:
"""Full agent loop with decision tracing."""
messages = [{"role": "user", "content": task}]
decisions = []
for step in range(max_steps):
with langfuse_context.observation(name=f"step.{step}") as step_span:
# Get LLM response
response = call_llm(messages)
# Trace the decision made at this step
decision = {
"step": step,
"type": classify_decision_type(response),
"action": None,
"reasoning": extract_reasoning(response),
}
if response.tool_calls:
# Tool use decision
decision["action"] = "tool_call"
decision["tools"] = [tc.function.name for tc in response.tool_calls]
step_span.set_attribute("decision.type", "tool_call")
step_span.set_attribute("decision.tools", decision["tools"])
elif response.stop_reason == "end_turn":
# Decision to respond
decision["action"] = "respond"
step_span.set_attribute("decision.type", "respond")
step_span.set_attribute("decision.final", True)
decisions.append(decision)
# Continue loop...
# Log full decision chain
langfuse_context.update_current_observation(
metadata={
"decision_chain": decisions,
"total_decisions": len(decisions),
"tool_decisions": sum(1 for d in decisions if d["action"] == "tool_call"),
}
)
return result
@observe(name="decision.evaluate")
def evaluate_decision_quality(
decision: dict,
outcome: dict,
ground_truth: dict = None,
) -> dict:
"""Score the quality of a decision after seeing the outcome."""
scores = {}
# Was the right tool chosen?
if decision["type"] == "tool_call":
if ground_truth and "expected_tool" in ground_truth:
scores["tool_correct"] = decision["tools"][0] == ground_truth["expected_tool"]
# Did the tool call succeed?
scores["tool_succeeded"] = outcome.get("tool_success", False)
# Was the decision efficient?
scores["tokens_used"] = outcome.get("tokens", 0)
scores["steps_taken"] = outcome.get("steps", 0)
# Did it lead to task completion?
scores["task_completed"] = outcome.get("success", False)
langfuse_context.update_current_observation(
metadata={
"decision_type": decision["type"],
"quality_scores": scores,
"overall_quality": calculate_overall(scores),
}
)
return scores
def analyze_tool_selection_patterns(traces: list) -> dict:
"""Analyze tool selection patterns across traces."""
patterns = {
"tool_usage": {}, # tool -> count
"tool_success_rate": {}, # tool -> success rate
"tool_by_task_type": {}, # task_type -> tool distribution
"unnecessary_calls": 0, # Tools called but not needed
"missing_calls": 0, # Tools needed but not called
}
for trace in traces:
for decision in trace.get("decisions", []):
if decision["type"] == "tool_call":
for tool in decision["tools"]:
patterns["tool_usage"][tool] = patterns["tool_usage"].get(tool, 0) + 1
return patterns
@observe(name="decision.replay")
def replay_decision(
trace_id: str,
step: int,
new_context: dict = None,
) -> dict:
"""Replay a decision with same or modified context."""
# Fetch original trace
original = langfuse.get_trace(trace_id)
original_decision = original.decisions[step]
# Reconstruct context at that step
context = reconstruct_context(original, step)
if new_context:
context.update(new_context)
# Re-run decision with same/modified context
new_response = call_llm(context["messages"])
new_decision = extract_decision(new_response)
langfuse_context.update_current_observation(
metadata={
"replay_of": trace_id,
"original_step": step,
"original_decision": original_decision,
"new_decision": new_decision,
"decision_changed": new_decision != original_decision,
"context_modified": new_context is not None,
}
)
return {
"original": original_decision,
"replayed": new_decision,
"changed": new_decision != original_decision,
}
@observe(name="decision.attribution")
def trace_decision_attribution(
decision: dict,
context_sources: list[dict],
) -> dict:
"""Trace what context influenced a decision."""
# Analyze which context pieces were relevant
relevant_sources = []
for source in context_sources:
relevance = calculate_relevance(decision, source)
if relevance > 0.5:
relevant_sources.append({
"source_id": source["id"],
"source_type": source["type"],
"relevance": relevance,
})
langfuse_context.update_current_observation(
metadata={
"decision_type": decision["type"],
"context_sources_total": len(context_sources),
"context_sources_relevant": len(relevant_sources),
"top_source": relevant_sources[0]["source_id"] if relevant_sources else None,
"attribution": relevant_sources[:3], # Top 3
}
)
return {
"decision": decision,
"attributed_to": relevant_sources,
}
# Decision quality metrics
decision_metrics = {
# Accuracy
"tool_selection_accuracy": "% correct tool choices",
"routing_accuracy": "% correct agent routing",
# Efficiency
"avg_decisions_per_task": "Average decisions before completion",
"unnecessary_tool_calls": "Tool calls that didn't help",
"backtrack_rate": "% of tasks requiring backtracking",
# Reasoning
"reasoning_provided_rate": "% with explicit reasoning",
"reasoning_quality_score": "Avg reasoning quality (via eval)",
# Outcomes
"decision_to_success_rate": "% of decisions leading to success",
"first_decision_correct_rate": "% first decision was right",
}
| Anti-Pattern | Problem | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Only logging chosen action | Can't analyze alternatives | Log available options |
| No confidence scores | Can't identify uncertain decisions | Log model confidence |
| Missing context at decision time | Can't replay/debug | Snapshot context |
| No decision-outcome linking | Can't measure quality | Track outcome per decision |
| Aggregating all decisions | Lose granular insight | Trace each decision point |
tool-call-tracking - Tool execution detailsmulti-agent-coordination - Agent routingevaluation-quality - Decision quality scoring