generate-claudemd

name	generate-claudemd
description	Generate project-specific CLAUDE.md from repo analysis.
user-invocable	false
command	/generate-claudemd
allowed-tools	["Read","Write","Bash","Grep","Glob","Skill"]
routing	{"triggers":["generate claude.md","create claude.md","init claude.md","bootstrap claude.md","make claude.md"],"pairs_with":["go-patterns","codebase-overview"],"complexity":"Medium","category":"documentation"}

Generate CLAUDE.md Skill

Produce a project-specific CLAUDE.md through a 4-phase pipeline: SCAN repo facts, DETECT domain enrichment, GENERATE from template, VALIDATE output. The goal is a CLAUDE.md that makes new Claude sessions immediately productive by documenting only verified, project-specific facts.

This skill generates new CLAUDE.md files. It cannot improve an existing one (use claude-md-improver for that), cannot document private dependencies or encrypted configs it cannot read, cannot infer runtime behavior from static files, and cannot replace deep domain expertise — enrichment patterns are templates, not knowledge.

This skill does not use context: fork because it requires interactive user gates (confirmation when CLAUDE.md already exists, review of generated output), which a forked context would bypass.

Reference Loading Table

Signal	Load These Files	Why
drafting CLAUDE.md sections in Phase 3	CLAUDEMD_TEMPLATE.md	Loads detailed guidance from CLAUDEMD_TEMPLATE.md.
example-driven tasks, errors	examples-and-errors.md	Loads detailed guidance from examples-and-errors.md.

Instructions

Execute all phases sequentially. Verify each gate before advancing. Load the template from ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/CLAUDEMD_TEMPLATE.md before Phase 3.

On explicit user request, two optional modes are available:

• Subdirectory CLAUDE.md: Generate per-package CLAUDE.md files for monorepos.
• Minimal Mode ("minimal claude.md"): Only 3 sections — Overview, Commands, Architecture.

See references/examples-and-errors.md for worked examples by language and the complete language indicator table.

Phase 1: SCAN

Goal: Gather facts about the repository — language, build system, directory structure, test patterns, config approach.

Step 1: Check for existing CLAUDE.md

ls -la CLAUDE.md .claude/CLAUDE.md 2>/dev/null

If a CLAUDE.md already exists, write output to CLAUDE.md.generated and show a diff, because overwriting a hand-tuned CLAUDE.md destroys work. Inform the user: "CLAUDE.md already exists. Output will be written to CLAUDE.md.generated so you can compare." Continue with all phases — the generated file is still useful for comparison.

If no CLAUDE.md exists, set output path to CLAUDE.md.

Step 2: Detect language and framework

Check root directory for language indicators (see references/examples-and-errors.md for the full indicator table).

Read the detected config file to extract: project name, dependencies, language version. Do not assume standard language patterns apply — read actual source files before writing any section, because conventions vary even within the same language ecosystem.

For Go projects:

head -5 go.mod

For Node.js projects:

cat package.json | head -30

Step 3: Parse build system

Parse the Makefile (or equivalent) for actual build targets rather than guessing commands, because the Makefile IS the source of truth for build commands in most repos and may wrap tools with flags, coverage, or race detection that raw invocations would miss.

ls Makefile makefile GNUmakefile 2>/dev/null
grep -E '^[a-zA-Z_-]+:' Makefile 2>/dev/null | head -20

Also check for: package.json scripts section, Taskfile.yml, justfile, CI config (.github/workflows/, .gitlab-ci.yml).

Record: build command, test command, lint command, "check everything" command. If no build system is found at all, document the gap rather than inventing commands.

Step 4: Map directory structure

ls -d */ 2>/dev/null
# Go projects:
ls internal/ cmd/ pkg/ 2>/dev/null

Categorize directories by role (source, test, config, docs, build, vendor).

Step 5: Find test patterns

ls *_test.go 2>/dev/null | head -5          # Go
ls *.test.ts *.test.js 2>/dev/null | head -5 # Node.js
ls test_*.py *_test.py 2>/dev/null | head -5 # Python

Read 1-2 representative test files to identify: test framework, assertion library, mocking approach, naming conventions.

Step 6: Detect configuration approach

ls .env.example .env.sample 2>/dev/null
ls config.yaml config.json *.toml *.ini 2>/dev/null
grep -r 'os.Getenv\|flag\.\|viper\.\|envconfig' --include='*.go' -l 2>/dev/null | head -5

Step 7: Detect code style tooling

ls .golangci.yml .eslintrc* .prettierrc* .flake8 pyproject.toml .editorconfig 2>/dev/null

If a linter config exists, read it to extract key rules.

Step 8: Check for license headers

grep -r 'SPDX-License-Identifier' --include='*.go' --include='*.py' --include='*.ts' -l 2>/dev/null | head -3

If found, note the license type and header convention.

GATE: Language detected. Build targets identified. Directory structure mapped. Test patterns found (or noted as absent). Config approach documented. Proceed ONLY when gate passes.

---

Phase 2: DETECT

Goal: Identify domain-specific enrichment sources based on repo characteristics. Auto-detect the repo domain and load domain-specific patterns (sapcc Go conventions, OpenStack patterns, etc.) because generic language knowledge is insufficient for project-specific CLAUDE.md generation.

Step 1: Check for sapcc domain (Go repos)

If Go project detected:

grep -i 'sapcc\|sap-' go.mod 2>/dev/null
grep -r 'github.com/sapcc' --include='*.go' -l 2>/dev/null | head -5

If sapcc imports found, load enrichment from go-patterns skill patterns:

• Anti-over-engineering principles
• Error wrapping conventions (fmt.Errorf("...: %w", err))
• must.Return scope rules
• Testing patterns (table-driven tests, assertion libraries)
• Makefile management via go-makefile-maker

Step 2: Check for OpenStack/Gophercloud

grep -i 'gophercloud\|openstack' go.mod 2>/dev/null
grep -r 'gophercloud' --include='*.go' -l 2>/dev/null | head -5

If found, note OpenStack API patterns, Keystone auth, and endpoint catalog usage.

Step 3: Detect database drivers

grep -E 'database/sql|pgx|gorm|sqlx|ent' go.mod 2>/dev/null
grep -E '"pg"|"mysql"|"prisma"|"typeorm"|"knex"|"drizzle"' package.json 2>/dev/null
grep -E 'sqlalchemy|django|psycopg|asyncpg' pyproject.toml requirements.txt 2>/dev/null

If found, plan to include Database Patterns section.

Step 4: Detect API frameworks

grep -E 'gorilla/mux|gin-gonic|chi|echo|fiber|go-swagger' go.mod 2>/dev/null
grep -E '"express"|"fastify"|"koa"|"hono"|"next"' package.json 2>/dev/null
grep -E 'fastapi|flask|django|starlette' pyproject.toml requirements.txt 2>/dev/null

If found, plan to include API Patterns section.

Step 5: Build enrichment plan

Enrichment Plan:
- [ ] sapcc Go conventions (if sapcc imports detected)
- [ ] OpenStack/Gophercloud patterns (if gophercloud detected)
- [ ] Error Handling section (if Go, Rust, or explicit error patterns)
- [ ] Database Patterns section (if DB driver detected)
- [ ] API Patterns section (if API framework detected)
- [ ] Configuration section (if non-trivial config detected)

GATE: Enrichment sources identified. Domain-specific patterns loaded (or explicitly noted as not applicable). Enrichment plan documented. Proceed ONLY when gate passes.

---

Phase 3: GENERATE

Goal: Load template, fill sections from scan results and enrichment, write CLAUDE.md. Every section must be derived from actual repo analysis because guessed content wastes the context window and teaches Claude wrong patterns.

Step 1: Load template

Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/CLAUDEMD_TEMPLATE.md for the output structure. Follow its structure exactly because consistent structure means Claude sessions can parse CLAUDE.md predictably across projects.

Step 2: Fill required sections

Fill all 6 required sections from Phase 1 scan results. Every section must be derived from actual repo analysis — no guesses, no fabricated content.

See references/examples-and-errors.md (Phase 3: Section Descriptions) for the full per-section rules, optional section guidelines, and banned generic phrases list.

Step 3: Fill optional sections

Based on the Phase 2 enrichment plan, fill applicable optional sections. Optional sections without evidence are worse than omitted sections.

Step 4: Apply domain enrichment

See references/examples-and-errors.md (Sapcc Go Enrichment) for the patterns to integrate into Code Style, Testing Conventions, and Common Pitfalls sections when sapcc imports were detected in Phase 2.

Step 5: Write output

Write the completed CLAUDE.md (or CLAUDE.md.generated) to the output path determined in Phase 1 Step 1. Verify every path mentioned in the output exists and every command is runnable before writing, because a CLAUDE.md with broken paths is worse than no CLAUDE.md — it teaches Claude to trust wrong information.

If writing to CLAUDE.md.generated, show the user a summary diff:

diff CLAUDE.md CLAUDE.md.generated 2>/dev/null || echo "New file created"

GATE: CLAUDE.md written. All required sections populated with project-specific content (no placeholders). Optional sections populated based on enrichment plan. Output path is correct. Proceed ONLY when gate passes.

---

Phase 4: VALIDATE

Goal: Verify the generated CLAUDE.md is accurate, complete, and free of generic filler.

Step 1: Verify all paths exist

Extract every file path and directory path mentioned in the generated CLAUDE.md. Check each one with test -e because one broken path undermines the entire document:

test -e "<path>" && echo "OK: <path>" || echo "MISSING: <path>"

If any path is missing, fix or remove the reference.

Step 2: Verify all commands parse

which <tool> 2>/dev/null || echo "MISSING: <tool>"
grep -q '^<target>:' Makefile 2>/dev/null || echo "MISSING TARGET: <target>"

Step 3: Check for remaining placeholders

grep -E '\{[^}]+\}|TODO|FIXME|TBD|PLACEHOLDER' <output_file>

If any placeholders remain, fill them from repo analysis or remove the containing section.

Step 4: Check for generic filler

See references/examples-and-errors.md for the banned generic phrases list. Search for each phrase; remove or replace any found.

Step 5: Report summary

Display the validation report from references/examples-and-errors.md (Phase 4 Validation Report Template).

GATE: All paths resolve. All commands verified. No placeholders remain. No generic filler detected. Validation report displayed.

---

References

Reference Files

• ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/CLAUDEMD_TEMPLATE.md: Template structure for generated CLAUDE.md files with required and optional sections
• ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/examples-and-errors.md: Worked examples by language/scenario, error handling, language indicator table, banned generic phrases
• Official Anthropic claude-md-management:claude-md-improver: Companion skill for improving existing CLAUDE.md files (use after generation for refinement)

Companion Skills

• go-patterns: Domain-specific patterns for sapcc Go repositories (loaded during Phase 2 enrichment)
• codebase-overview: Deeper codebase exploration when CLAUDE.md generation needs more architectural context