| name | azure-ops |
| description | Azure operations — Virtual Machines, App Service, Azure Functions, AKS, Cosmos DB, Azure AD. Use when working with azure ops. |
| domain | devops |
| author | oyi77 |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| subdomain | devops |
| tags | ["azure","ci-cd","devops","infrastructure","ops"] |
| version | 1.0.0 |
Overview
Azure operations covering VMs, App Service, Functions, AKS, Cosmos DB, and Azure AD for identity management.
Capabilities
- Virtual Machine management
- App Service web hosting
- Azure Functions serverless
- AKS Kubernetes clusters
- Cosmos DB multi-model
- Azure AD identity
- ARM/Bicep templates
When to Use
Trigger phrases:
-
"azure ops"
-
"Azure operations — Virtual Machines, App Service, Azure Functions, AKS, Cosmos D"
-
Azure cloud management
-
Enterprise identity with Azure AD
-
.NET application hosting
-
Hybrid cloud scenarios
When NOT to Use
- Task is outside your authorization scope
- You need to implement controls (use implementing-* skills)
- Task is about analysis, not action (use analyzing-* skills)
- You don't have access to target systems
- Task requires compliance expertise (consult professionals)
- Task is about defense, not offense (use defensive skills)
Pseudo Code
The azure-ops workflow follows a standard pipeline pattern.
Core flow:
# azure-ops primary flow
input = prepare(raw_data)
result = process(input, config={azure, cosmos, functions, machines, operations})
validate(result)
deliver(result)
Error handling:
on error:
log(error_details)
retry_with_backoff(max=3)
if still_failing: alert_and_escalate()
Azure CLI Deploy
az webapp create -g MyRG -p MyPlan -n MyApp --runtime "NODE:18-lts"
az functionapp create -g MyRG -p MyPlan -n MyFunc --runtime node
Common Patterns
- Managed identities over secrets
- Azure Policy for compliance
- Resource locks for production
- Reserved instances for savings
How to Use
- Define infrastructure as code (Terraform, CloudFormation, Pulumi)
- Review changes through PR process before applying
- Configure monitoring and alerting for critical paths
- Set up secrets management (Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, etc.)
- Document runbooks for deployment, rollback, and incident response
- Test disaster recovery procedures regularly
Red Flags
- Infrastructure changes without review: Unreviewed changes cause outages — use PRs for infra code
- No rollback strategy: Every deployment needs a tested rollback plan before it runs
- Secrets in configuration files: Secrets in YAML/JSON get committed to version control
- Missing monitoring and alerting: Without monitoring, outages go undetected until users report them
- No documentation for runbooks: Without runbooks, on-call engineers waste time re-discovering procedures
Verification
Process
- Analyze the task requirements
- Apply domain expertise
- Verify output quality
Anti-Rationalization Table
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|
| "Manual deployments are fine" | Manual deployments are error-prone and不可 repeatable. Automate. |
| "We do not need monitoring" | Without monitoring, you are flying blind. Add observability from day one. |
| "Infrastructure as code is overkill" | IaC enables reproducibility, version control, and disaster recovery. |