| name | fluxcd-gitops |
| description | Flux CD GitOps — source controllers, kustomize/helm controllers, image automation, notifications. Use when working with fluxcd gitops. |
| domain | devops |
| author | oyi77 |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| subdomain | devops |
| tags | ["ci-cd","devops","fluxcd","gitops","infrastructure"] |
| version | 1.0.0 |
Overview
Flux CD is a GitOps toolkit for Kubernetes using source, kustomize, helm, and notification controllers. Declarative CRDs manage the entire delivery pipeline.
Capabilities
- Source controllers (Git, OCI, Helm repos, S3)
- Kustomize and Helm release controllers
- Image automation (scan repos, update manifests)
- Alert providers (Slack, Discord, PagerDuty)
- Multi-tenancy with impersonation
- Dependency management between resources
When to Use
Trigger phrases:
-
"fluxcd gitops"
-
"Flux CD GitOps — source controllers, kustomize/helm controllers, image automatio"
-
Kubernetes GitOps without a separate UI
-
Prefer CRD-only approach over Application objects
-
Need image automation (auto-update on new images)
-
Multi-tenant clusters with namespace isolation
Pseudo Source
- Configure automation, controllers, flux, fluxcd, gitops settings before first use
GitRepository
apiVersion: source.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
kind: GitRepository
metadata:
name: fleet
namespace: flux-system
spec:
interval: 1m
url: https://github.com/org/fleet
ref:
branch: main
secretRef:
name: github-credentials
Kustomization
apiVersion: kustomize.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1
kind: Kustomization
metadata:
name: myapp
namespace: flux-system
spec:
interval: 10m
sourceRef:
kind: GitRepository
name: fleet
path: ./apps/myapp/production
prune: true
healthChecks:
- apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
name: myapp
namespace: production
timeout: 5m
dependsOn:
- name: infrastructure
HelmRelease
apiVersion: helm.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v2beta1
kind: HelmRelease
metadata:
name: nginx
namespace: production
spec:
interval: 10m
chart:
spec:
chart: nginx
sourceRef:
kind: HelmRepository
name: bitnami
version: "15.x.x"
values:
replicaCount: 3
service:
type: ClusterIP
Image Automation
apiVersion: image.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1beta2
kind: ImageRepository
metadata:
name: myapp
spec:
image: ghcr.io/org/myapp
interval: 5m
---
apiVersion: image.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1beta2
kind: ImagePolicy
metadata:
name: myapp
spec:
imageRepositoryRef:
name: myapp
policy:
semver:
range: ">=2.0.0 <3.0.0"
Notifications
apiVersion: notification.toolkit.fluxcd.io/v1beta3
kind: Alert
metadata:
name: on-call
spec:
providerRef:
name: slack
eventSeverity: info
eventSources:
- kind: Kustomization
name: '*'
Common Patterns
- Bootstrapping:
flux bootstrap github --owner=org --repository=fleet
- Multi-tenancy: namespace isolation with service account impersonation
- OCI sources: store manifests as OCI artifacts
- SOPS secrets: encrypted secrets in Git with Mozilla SOPS
How to Use
- Define infrastructure as code (Terraform, CloudFormation, Pulumi)
- Review changes through PR process before applying
- Configure monitoring and alerting for critical paths
- Set up secrets management (Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, etc.)
- Document runbooks for deployment, rollback, and incident response
- Test disaster recovery procedures regularly
When NOT to Use
- Task is outside your authorization scope
- You need to implement controls (use implementing-* skills)
- Task is about analysis, not action (use analyzing-* skills)
- You don't have access to target systems
- Task requires compliance expertise (consult professionals)
- Task is about defense, not offense (use defensive skills)
Red Flags
- Infrastructure changes without review: Unreviewed changes cause outages — use PRs for infra code
- No rollback strategy: Every deployment needs a tested rollback plan before it runs
- Secrets in configuration files: Secrets in YAML/JSON get committed to version control
- Missing monitoring and alerting: Without monitoring, outages go undetected until users report them
- No documentation for runbooks: Without runbooks, on-call engineers waste time re-discovering procedures
Verification
Process
- Analyze the task requirements
- Apply domain expertise
- Verify output quality
Anti-Rationalization Table
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|
| "Manual deployments are fine" | Manual deployments are error-prone and不可 repeatable. Automate. |
| "We do not need monitoring" | Without monitoring, you are flying blind. Add observability from day one. |
| "Infrastructure as code is overkill" | IaC enables reproducibility, version control, and disaster recovery. |