penpot-design-to-code-review

name	penpot-design-to-code-review
description	Review a Penpot design against its implemented code (a source component or Storybook story) and emit a structured DRIFT report. Use when an engineer needs to confirm the build matches the design: extract HTML/CSS from a selection, map its tokens/structure/states to the code component, diff them, and list what each side is missing with severity and a reconciliation. Degrades gracefully to a design-system-token check when no code source is supplied. Triggers: 'design to code review', 'does my code match the design', 'design code parity', 'compare Penpot to my component', 'check this against Storybook', 'extract HTML/CSS from this selection', 'find design drift', 'design implementation diff'.
disable-model-invocation	false
version	0.2.0
audiences	["design-engineer"]
mode-default	suggest
requires	["shared/penpot-mcp-tool-reference.md","shared/plugin-api-gotchas.md","shared/tokens-schema.json","shared/naming-conventions.md","shared/state-management.md","shared/modes-and-policies.md"]

penpot-design-to-code-review — Close the design↔code bridge in the READ direction

1. Title + How it works

This skill reads a Penpot selection and compares it to the engineer's implemented code, then reports the drift. Every mutation goes through execute_code; validate visually with export_shape; read structure with penpotUtils.shapeStructure (full tool surface: shared/penpot-mcp-tool-reference.md). It reads tokens with penpotUtils.tokenOverview, extracts the design's HTML/CSS with penpot.generateMarkup(shapes, opts) and penpot.generateStyle(shapes, opts) (both invoked through execute_code), and produces a visual for side-by-side comparison with the separate export_shape tool. This skill is read-only on the canvas by default (mode: suggest) — it never mutates the design; it emits a report and, only on explicit request, proposes reconciliation steps. The code side (a React/Vue/etc. component file, or a rendered Storybook story / its DOM+CSS) is supplied by the user or by another MCP (filesystem, Storybook, a browser tool). If no code source is available, the skill degrades gracefully and compares the selection against the design-system tokens instead.

---

2. The One Rule That Matters Most

Never one-shot a review, and never mutate during one. Extract → normalize → map → diff → report, one logical execute_code call per step, with a read or export_shape between phases. A drift report that was assembled in a single blast is unverifiable and almost always wrong about token names. This is a suggest-mode skill: the canvas is not touched. The only thing you produce is a structured DRIFT report; reconciliation edits, if requested, are handed off to a write-capable skill (penpot-foundations for token work, penpot-rename-layers, or penpot-build-from-code for structural rebuilds) under their own checkpoints.

---

3. Penpot MCP Tool Reference

Full surface: see shared/penpot-mcp-tool-reference.md. The calls this skill leans on:

Need	Call (inside execute_code unless noted)
Resolve the selection	penpot.selection (array of shapes)
Read the object tree of the selection	penpotUtils.shapeStructure(shape, maxDepth)
Read active tokens (names → resolved values)	penpotUtils.tokenOverview()
Find a token referenced by a raw value	penpotUtils.findTokensByName(name) / findTokenByName(name)
Generate the design's HTML	penpot.generateMarkup(shapes, opts)
Generate the design's CSS	penpot.generateStyle(shapes, opts)
Inspect a shape's bound tokens	shape.tokens (map of property → token)
Inspect raw style values	shape.fills, shape.strokes, shape.shadows, shape.borderRadius, geometry via shape.width/height/bounds
Produce a comparison image	export_shape (separate MCP tool, not JS) — one call per state board

Verify any unfamiliar signature with penpot_api_info (e.g. penpot_api_info("Page", "generateMarkup"), penpot_api_info("Shape", "tokens")) before relying on it.

---

4. Plugin API Essentials

Gotcha numbers refer to shared/plugin-api-gotchas.md. What bites this skill:

• generateMarkup / generateStyle take an array of shapes, not a single shape, and accept an opts object. Confirm the exact opts keys with penpot_api_info("Penpot", "generateMarkup") / ("Penpot", "generateStyle") before passing options — guessing option names silently produces default output and you will wrongly conclude "no drift". Pass penpot.selection (already an array) directly.
• #1 Style arrays are immutable item-by-item — fine for reading (shape.fills[0].fillColor); never attempt to "fix" a fill here — this skill does not mutate.
• #5 width/height/parentX/parentY are read-only — read geometry for the diff; no resize()/setParentXY() here.
• #2 Token application is async (~100 ms) — irrelevant to reading, but if a reconciliation hand-off applies a token, do not read it back in the same call (don't assert false failures).
• shape.tokens is the authoritative map of which design tokens are bound to which properties. Prefer it over guessing tokens from raw hex. A raw value with no bound token is itself a drift finding ("design uses a hardcoded value, not a token").
• generateStyle emits the design's notion of CSS — it does not know your code's class names or variables. Treat its output as the design's intent, then normalize both sides (see references/04) before diffing. Do not string-compare raw CSS.
• Verify, don't guess. When generateMarkup/generateStyle return something unexpected, the first hypothesis is a wrong opts key or a non-array argument — re-check with penpot_api_info, not a retry with a different guess.

---

5. Token-Aware Brief Contract

Before extracting anything, restate the request as a contract. Act as a senior design-engineer who treats the design file as the spec of record and never accepts a hardcoded value where a token exists.

• Context — what is being reviewed (a single component, a state set, a screen region) and for whom (which app/library, which framework the code is in).
• Objective — single and specific: "Confirm <Button variant=primary size=md> in src/Button.tsx matches the Penpot selection, including hover/disabled states." Not "review the design."
• Inputs —
  • the Penpot selection (resolve it; if empty, ask the user to select or name the board);
  • the code source: a file path / pasted component code, OR a Storybook story (URL or rendered DOM+CSS), OR explicitly none;
  • the token set in play (tokenOverview()), and which tier semantic tokens should resolve to.
• Constraints — which side is authoritative for which dimension (usually: design authoritative for visual tokens, spacing, states; code authoritative for behavior/a11y semantics); tokens-only on the 4px grid; forbidden to mutate the canvas in this skill.
• Acceptance Criteria (quantitative) —
  • every design property is classified as match / drift / code-only / design-only;
  • every color/spacing/radius/type drift names the token involved (or flags "no token bound");
  • color drifts report a hex-level delta and, where relevant, the WCAG contrast impact;
  • spacing drifts report the px delta and whether the value is on the 4px grid;
  • state coverage is reported as a matrix (design states × code states) with explicit gaps;
  • severity assigned to every finding (Critical / Major / Minor) per the rubric in §8.

---

6. Mandatory Workflow

Phase 0 — Discovery (read-only)

• Goal: know what you're reviewing and what tokens exist before reading any style.
• Steps:
  1. high_level_overview (once per session).
  2. execute_code: resolve penpot.selection; if empty, stop and ask the user to select the component/board. Return ids, names, types, count.
  3. execute_code: penpotUtils.shapeStructure(sel[0], 4) for each top-level selected shape — capture the tree (names, types, nesting).
  4. execute_code: penpotUtils.tokenOverview() — capture token sets, names, resolved values.
  5. Confirm the code source with the user (file path / pasted code / Storybook / none).
• Exit criterion: you can name the design's structure, its tokens, and the code source (or confirmed absence).
• ✋ Checkpoint: show the structure summary + token inventory + the code source you'll diff against. Ask the user to confirm scope and which side is authoritative for which dimension.

Phase 1 — Extract markup & style from the design

• Goal: turn the selection into normalized HTML + CSS + a token map.
• Steps: use scripts/extractMarkupStyle.js — one execute_code call that runs penpot.generateMarkup(sel, opts), penpot.generateStyle(sel, opts), walks shape.tokens for each node, and returns { markup, style, perNode:[{id,name,type,tokens,rawFills,rawSpacing,radius,typography}] }.
• Exit criterion: you have the design's HTML, CSS, and a per-node token/raw-value map.
• ✋ Checkpoint: show the extracted markup + style (trimmed) and the token map. Confirm before mapping.

Phase 2 — Capture a comparison image

• Goal: a visual the engineer can eyeball against the rendered code.
• Steps: run scripts/exportForCompare.js to gather the shape id, bounds, and metadata; then call the export_shape MCP tool with 'selection' (or the captured id), format: png. For multi-state components, export each state board separately. Ask the engineer for a screenshot of the rendered code/story (or capture it via a browser MCP if available).
• Exit criterion: design image(s) in hand, paired with the code render(s).
• ✋ Checkpoint: present side-by-side; let the engineer flag obvious visual deltas to prioritize.

Phase 3 — Map design ↔ source

• Goal: establish the correspondence between design nodes/tokens/states and code elements/variables/props. See references/02.
• Steps: parse the supplied code (props, CSS/var usage, state classes/variants); build a mapping table designNode → codeElement, designToken → codeVar, designState → codeState. If the code is a Storybook story, derive states from the story's args/controls (see references/03). If no code source: map design tokens to the design-system token set only and skip the code column (graceful degradation).
• Exit criterion: a mapping table with every design property associated to a code counterpart or marked unmapped.
• ✋ Checkpoint: show the mapping table; correct mis-maps before diffing.

Phase 4 — Diff & emit DRIFT report

• Goal: the deliverable.
• Steps: run the comparison logic from references/04, assemble with scripts/generateDriftReport.js (structured output), classify each finding (match/drift/code-only/design-only), assign severity, and suggest a reconciliation for each non-match. Cite the WCAG number for any contrast-impacting color drift.
• Exit criterion: a complete report covering tokens, structure, spacing, typography, and states, with severities and reconciliations.
• ✋ Checkpoint: present the report. If the user wants fixes applied, hand off to the appropriate write skill — do not mutate here.

---

7. Critical Rules

1. Read-only on the canvas. This skill never calls a mutating method. Reconciliation is a hand-off, gated by the downstream skill's own checkpoints.
2. Never string-compare raw CSS. Normalize both sides (units → px, colors → lowercase hex, shorthand expanded, properties sorted) before diffing. See references/04.
3. A hardcoded value with no bound token is a finding, even if it visually matches the code. Report it as Minor design-hygiene drift ("value not tokenized").
4. Name the token in every visual finding. Read shape.tokens first; only fall back to matching raw hex against tokenOverview() when no token is bound.
5. Spacing deltas state px and grid-alignment. Any value not a multiple of 4 is flagged regardless of whether code matches it.
6. Degrade, don't guess. No code source → compare against design-system tokens and say so in the report header; never fabricate the code side.
7. One execute_code per logical step, sequential, with a checkpoint between phases. Never batch extraction + mapping + diff.
8. Confirm generateMarkup/generateStyle opts with penpot_api_info before passing options.
9. Verify the selection is non-empty before any extraction; an empty selection silently yields empty markup.
10. State coverage is a matrix, not a checkbox. Report every (design state × code state) cell.

---

8. Domain Architecture

The DRIFT report schema (what generateDriftReport.js returns and what you render):

{
  runId, scope, codeSource: "file" | "storybook" | "none",
  authoritative: { visual: "design", behavior: "code", ... },
  summary: { match, drift, codeOnly, designOnly, critical, major, minor },
  findings: [
    {
      id,                         // stable, e.g. "drift-color-01"
      dimension: "color" | "spacing" | "typography" | "radius" | "structure" | "state",
      designNode, codeElement,    // either may be null
      designValue, codeValue,     // normalized
      token,                      // bound design token name or null
      status: "match" | "drift" | "design-only" | "code-only",
      delta,                      // px delta, hex delta, contrast delta, etc.
      grid4px,                    // boolean | null (spacing only)
      wcag,                       // criterion string if contrast-impacting, else null
      severity: "Critical" | "Major" | "Minor",
      reconciliation              // concrete, one-line suggested fix + which side to change
    }
  ],
  stateMatrix: { design: [...], code: [...], cells: [{ state, design: bool, code: bool }] }
}

This shape is formalized in shared/report-schemas/drift-report.schema.json; include the derived top-level drift count (= summary.drift + summary.designOnly + summary.codeOnly), which the code-to-penpot-sync workflow branches on.

Severity rubric:

Severity	Definition
Critical	Functional/accessibility-affecting parity break: a state exists in design but not code (or vice versa) for an interactive element; a color drift drops contrast below WCAG 1.4.3 AA (4.5:1 / 3:1).
Major	Visible visual mismatch users will notice: wrong semantic token bound, spacing off by ≥ 8px, type size/weight mismatch, missing structural element (icon, label).
Minor	Hygiene / sub-perceptual: value not tokenized though it matches, ≤ 4px spacing delta, ordering/naming differences, optional decorative drift.

Dimensions diffed: token usage (which token, bound vs hardcoded), structure (node tree vs DOM tree), spacing (padding/gap/margin on the 4px grid), typography (family/size/weight/line-height/letter-spacing), radius/border, and state coverage.

---

9. Modes & Policies

See shared/modes-and-policies.md. This skill is suggest by default and stays there — it is an audit. It auto-applies nothing to the canvas. There is no safe-set for this skill because it performs no mutations; the "output" is the report. If the user asks to fix drift, the skill explicitly hands off: token swaps → penpot-foundations (apply-with-review), layer naming → penpot-rename-layers, structural/geometry changes → penpot-build-from-code. Each reconciliation is presented as a proposal with the source-of-truth side named; nothing is changed without that downstream skill's checkpoint.

---

10. State Management

See shared/state-management.md. RUN_ID slug example: d2c-2026-06-05-a. Ledger keys written via storage (this skill is read-only on the canvas, so it does not write setSharedPluginData unless the user opts into persisting the report):

• storage.run.scope — resolved selection ids/names.
• storage.run.tokens — cached tokenOverview() result.
• storage.run.extracted — { markup, style, perNode } from Phase 1.
• storage.run.mapping — the design↔code mapping table from Phase 3.
• storage.run.report — the final DRIFT report object.

Resume: re-read storage.run; if absent (new session), re-run Phase 0 discovery and re-derive from shapeStructure + tokenOverview rather than trusting a stale report. Optionally mirror the report to setSharedPluginData(NS, "${RUN_ID}.driftReport", JSON.stringify(report)) only if the user wants it persisted in-file for handoff.

---

11. User Checkpoints

After phase	Artifacts shown	What we ask
0 Discovery	Structure summary, token inventory, identified code source	"Confirm scope + which side is authoritative for which dimension."
1 Extract	Trimmed markup + style, per-node token map	"Does this match what you expect the design to declare?"
2 Visual	export_shape PNG(s) paired with code render(s)	"Flag any obvious visual deltas to prioritize."
3 Mapping	design↔code mapping table	"Correct any mis-mapped node/token/state."
4 Report	Full DRIFT report (summary + findings + state matrix)	"Approve. Want reconciliation handed off to a write skill?"

---

12. Naming Conventions

See shared/naming-conventions.md. This skill reads names; it relies on them being semantic (button, label, icon, h1–h6) to map design nodes to DOM elements. Auto-generated names (Rectangle 12, Board) degrade mapping quality — if the selection is full of them, recommend running penpot-rename-layers first and note reduced structural-diff confidence in the report. Tokens are matched against the dot-notation taxonomy in shared/tokens-schema.json; token type strings are the exact Penpot spellings (color, spacing, borderRadius, fontSizes, etc.). Code variables (CSS custom props, JS theme keys) are normalized to that dot-notation before mapping (e.g. --color-action-primary-bg ↔ color.action.primary.bg).

---

13. Anti-Rationalization Table

Excuse the LLM makes	Why it's wrong	Deterministic countermeasure
"The CSS strings differ, so it's drift."	generateStyle emits 16px, code emits 1rem; #FFF vs #ffffff; shorthand vs longhand. Raw-string diff yields garbage findings.	Normalize both sides first (units→px, colors→lowercase 6-digit hex, expand shorthand, sort props). Diff the normalized maps only.
"Hex matches the code, so this property passes."	A matching hex with no bound token still breaks theming and governance — it silently won't switch in dark mode.	Read shape.tokens. If no token is bound, emit a Minor "value not tokenized" finding even when the hex matches.
"No Storybook/code was given, so I can't review."	The skill is required to degrade gracefully.	Switch to design-system-token mode: diff the selection against tokenOverview(), mark codeSource: "none" in the report header, and report only design-side findings.
"generateStyle came back nearly empty — design has barely any styling."	Far more likely you passed a single shape instead of the array, or a wrong opts key.	Re-check: pass penpot.selection (an array); verify opts with penpot_api_info. Re-extract before concluding "no drift."
"I'll just fix the token mismatch in Penpot while I'm here."	This is a suggest-mode read-only skill; mutating breaks the contract and skips the downstream checkpoint.	Do not mutate. Emit the reconciliation as a proposal and hand off to penpot-foundations/penpot-build-from-code.
"Spacing is 18px in both, so it matches — pass."	18 is off the 4px grid; matching code does not make it correct.	Flag any non-multiple-of-4 spacing as a finding (grid4px:false) regardless of code agreement; suggest the nearest grid token.

---

14. Helper Code Snippets

Resolve and summarize the selection (Phase 0):

const sel = penpot.selection || [];
return sel.length === 0
  ? { empty: true, hint: "Select the component/board to review, then re-run." }
  : { count: sel.length, items: sel.map(s => ({ id: s.id, name: s.name, type: s.type })) };

Read which tokens are bound on a node vs raw values (Phase 1):

const s = penpotUtils.findShapeById("REPLACE-ME-shape-id");
const tokens = s.tokens ? Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(s.tokens)) : {};
const fill = Array.isArray(s.fills) && s.fills[0] ? s.fills[0].fillColor : null;
return { id: s.id, name: s.name, boundTokens: tokens, rawFillColor: fill, radius: s.borderRadius ?? null };

Match a raw hex to an existing token when nothing is bound (Phase 4 fallback):

const overview = penpotUtils.tokenOverview();
const target = "REPLACE-ME-#0066ff".toLowerCase();
// scan resolved color tokens for an exact value match
const hit = (overview.tokens || []).find(t =>
  t.type === "color" && String(t.resolvedValue).toLowerCase() === target);
return { rawValue: target, suggestedToken: hit ? hit.name : null };

---

15. Reference Resources

• penpot_api_info("Penpot", "generateMarkup") and ("Penpot", "generateStyle") — confirm opts keys before Phase 1.
• penpot_api_info("Shape", "tokens") — confirm the bound-token map shape.
• penpot_api_info("Page", "shapeStructure") / penpotUtils — structure read.
• shared/penpot-mcp-tool-reference.md — the tool surface and globals.
• shared/plugin-api-gotchas.md — immutable arrays, async tokens, read-only geometry.
• shared/tokens-schema.json — token type strings, tiers, 4px grid rule.
• W3C WCAG 1.4.3 (contrast) for color-drift severity escalation.

---

16. Supporting Files

References (progressive disclosure — load when that phase runs)

File	Read during	Covers
references/01-extract-markup-style.md	Phase 1	generateMarkup/generateStyle usage, opts, reading shape.tokens and raw values, building the per-node map
references/02-mapping-to-source.md	Phase 3	Parsing the supplied component code, mapping design nodes→DOM, tokens→CSS vars/theme keys, states→props/classes
references/03-storybook-compare.md	Phase 3 (Storybook case)	Deriving states from story args/controls, capturing rendered DOM+CSS, graceful degradation when only a URL is given
references/04-drift-report.md	Phase 4	Normalization rules, the diff algorithm, severity rubric, report rendering, reconciliation phrasing

Scripts (paste into an execute_code call; replace placeholders)

Script	Use for
scripts/extractMarkupStyle.js	Phase 1 — generateMarkup + generateStyle + per-node token/raw-value map for the selection
scripts/exportForCompare.js	Phase 2 — gather shape id(s), bounds, and metadata so the caller can invoke the export_shape MCP tool
scripts/generateDriftReport.js	Phase 4 — assemble the structured DRIFT report from extracted design data + the mapped code data