| name | new-project |
| description | Use when the task matches skill: new project scaffold and this skill's local workflow. |
| metadata | {"use_when":"Use when the task matches skill: new project scaffold and this skill's local workflow.","do_not_use_when":"Do not use when a more specific upstream or downstream skill owns the task, or when the required project context has not been prepared.","required_inputs":"Provide the target project or document, the relevant context files, scope constraints, and any domain or standards inputs referenced here.","workflow":"Follow the ordered steps, review gates, and local generation logic in this file before consulting deeper support files as needed.","quality_standards":"Keep outputs grounded in source context, traceable to stated standards, and specific enough to review or verify.","anti_patterns":"Do not fabricate missing requirements, skip human review gates, or substitute vague prose for verifiable documentation.","outputs":"Produce or update the document, scaffold, analysis, or phase artifact that this skill defines.","references":"Use sibling files in this directory when deeper detail is needed.","portable":true,"compatible_with":["claude-code","codex"]} |
Skill: New Project Scaffold
Inputs
| Artefact | Required? | Purpose |
|---|
| Approved project profile and roadmap | yes | Drive scaffold scope |
| Repository conventions and existing files | yes | Preserve local structure |
Outputs
| Artefact | Consumer | Acceptance condition |
|---|
| Project documentation scaffold | Project team | No destructive overwrite, links resolve, roadmap represented |
Capability contract
Read/search are required. File creation requires explicit scaffold authority. Do not install tools, initialise remote services, or publish artefacts implicitly.
Degraded mode
Fallback without write access: return the directory tree and file templates as a proposed patch.
Decision rules
| State | Action | Failure avoided |
|---|
| Empty project | Create approved minimal scaffold | Context overload |
| Existing partial documentation | Fill gaps and preserve content | Destructive replacement |
| Conflicting methodology files | Stop and reconcile with roadmap | Contradictory process |
Domain anti-patterns
- Creating empty placeholder documents. Fix: include purpose, owner, and next action.
- Copying a universal scaffold. Fix: derive files from the approved roadmap.
- Replacing existing project rules. Fix: preserve and reconcile them.
- Adding tool-specific adapters as canonical truth. Fix: keep sources model-neutral.
- Claiming setup is complete without link checks. Fix: validate the scaffold and references.
Trigger
User says any of: "start a new project", "create a new project",
"scaffold a project", "new client project", "initialize project"
MANDATORY FIRST STEP
Before anything else, invoke superpowers:brainstorming to explore the project
intent, requirements, and design. Do NOT skip this step. Do NOT ask clarifying
questions before invoking brainstorming.
How to Use the SRS-Skills Engine (PRIME Workflow)
Every skill in this engine follows the PRIME methodology (Kodukula & Vinueza, 2024):
| Step | What the Consultant Does | SRS-Skills Equivalent |
|---|
| P — Prepare | Gather all project data before prompting | Populate _context/ files with real stakeholder data, not placeholders |
| R — Relay | Submit the prompt with precise instructions | Invoke the SKILL.md (tell Claude: "Run the [skill name] skill") |
| I — Inspect | Critically evaluate AI output against objectives | Read the generated document; check it against _context/ source files |
| M — Modify | Refine if output diverges from expectations | Edit the output or update _context/ and re-invoke the skill |
| E — Execute | Approve and build the final artifact | Run build-doc.sh to produce the .docx |
Quality rule: Never execute (build the .docx) without completing Inspect and Modify. The first AI output is a draft, not a deliverable.
The _context/ directory is the Project Input Folder (PIF) for this project — a living repository of project-specific context that feeds every skill. The richer the PIF, the higher the quality of every generated document (Kodukula & Vinueza, 2024).
Interview Protocol
After brainstorming, ask these questions ONE AT A TIME. Do not ask the next until
the previous is answered.
Q1: What is the project name? (This becomes the directory name — use hyphens,
e.g., Livecare-Hospital-ERP)
Q2: In 2–3 sentences, what does this software do and what problem does it solve?
(This pre-populates _context/vision.md and is used to deduce the domain)
Q3: Which methodology best fits this project?
- A) Waterfall — regulated industry, fixed scope, formal IEEE 830 SRS required
- B) Agile — iterative delivery, user stories, Scrum/Kanban
- C) Hybrid — formal SRS for backend/core + agile user stories for frontend/features
Q4: Who is the project owner / primary client contact name?
Domain Deduction (NO USER INPUT REQUIRED)
After Q2, Claude analyses the project description and deduces the domain automatically
using these signals:
| If description mentions... | Deduce domain |
|---|
| patients, hospitals, clinics, EMR, EHR, PHI, medical, healthcare, pharmacy, nursing | healthcare |
| banking, payments, ledger, transactions, trading, insurance, loans, fintech, accounting | finance |
| students, courses, LMS, grades, enrollment, university, school, e-learning | education |
| inventory, POS, e-commerce, retail, products, orders, cart, warehouse (retail context) | retail |
| fleet, shipments, tracking, logistics, freight, warehouse (supply chain), delivery, routing | logistics |
| government, citizens, public services, procurement, permits, case management, municipal | government |
| farm, crops, livestock, agriculture, harvest, planting, irrigation, cattle, poultry, FMIS | agriculture |
If ambiguous (two domains equally match): Ask the user during the brainstorming
session — e.g., "This sounds like it could be healthcare OR government — which primary
domain applies?"
If no domain matches: Use other — no domain defaults are injected; scaffold
only the directory structure and empty context files.
Additional Guidance
Extended project-scaffold guidance was moved to references/new-project-deep-dive.md to keep this entrypoint compact and fast to load.
Use that deep dive for:
Scaffold Actions
Quick Links
What We Are Building
Document Inventory by Phase
Context Files (_context/)
Progress Summary
Immediate Next Steps
Problem Statement
Goals
Stakeholders
Success Criteria
Feature Name
- Additional deep-dive sections continue in the reference file.