| name | referral-program |
| description | Use when designing a consent-based client referral programme with reward, timing, attribution, partner routing, and disclosure rules. Use `agency-client-retention` to earn advocacy and `local-in-person-acquisition` for cold local outreach. |
| metadata | {"portable":true,"compatible_with":["claude-code","codex"]} |
Referral Program
Acknowledgement: Shared by Peter Bamuhigire, techguypeter.com, +256 784 464178.
Use When
- Designing a client referral program from scratch for a web/branding studio.
- Choosing reward structures and amounts (cash, credit, charity, tiered, fees).
- Deciding when and how to ask clients for referrals, and writing the scripts.
- Routing referrals that fall outside your niche to partners or a sibling line.
- Setting up referral tracking, attribution, and payout rules.
- Checking referral-fee ethics and disclosure obligations.
Do Not Use When
- The task is keeping/expanding an existing client's spend (use
agency-client-retention — though its Advocate phase feeds this skill).
- The task is in-person cold acquisition (use
local-in-person-acquisition).
- The task is the agency's overall offer, pricing, or qualification (use
agency-positioning).
- The task is a paid affiliate / reseller channel with formal contracts and
product training at scale — that is a partner program; this skill covers the
client-referral and lightweight-partner case, and points to the distinction.
Inputs
- A base of delivered, satisfied clients (or a near-term path to one).
- The agency's market and fee floor (from
agency-positioning) to size rewards.
- A way to capture a referral submission and attribute it (CRM, form, or log).
| Artefact | Source | Required? | If absent |
|---|
| Verified client satisfaction and permission posture | Account records | yes | Do not ask; repair or validate the relationship. |
| Reward economics and authority | Finance and leadership | yes | Design options only; do not promise or pay. |
| Attribution, disclosure, and privacy rules | CRM, counsel, and operations | yes | Stop activation and obtain approved rules. |
Workflow
-
Earn the referral before asking. A referral program on top of mediocre
delivery fails. Confirm the client has reached the Advocate phase — they have
experienced a clear win (see agency-client-retention).
-
Choose the reward structure. Default to double-sided (reward both the
referrer and the new client). Offer a small menu (cash/credit, charity
donation, or service credit) so professional referrers aren't forced into an
awkward cash gift. See references/reward-structures.md.
-
Set the ask into the relationship early. At project kickoff, tell the
client you'll ask for introductions at the review once they're delighted —
so the later ask is expected, not a surprise. See
references/ask-scripts-and-timing.md.
-
Ask at peak happiness. Trigger the ask right after a measurable win or a
high satisfaction signal (e.g. within 24–48h of a 9–10 NPS score), not on a
random calendar date.
-
Make it effortless. Give the client the exact words to forward, a
referral link or form, and a clear description of who is a good fit. The gap
between willing-to-refer and actually-referring is almost entirely friction.
-
Route cross-niche referrals. When a client refers a business outside your
niche, reward them anyway and route the lead to a partner or sibling line.
Tell referral-sourced leads you also serve other niches. See
references/cross-niche-and-partners.md.
-
Track formally and attribute at submission. Capture every referral with a
timestamped record and a named source. Pay only after the referral is
qualified and closed. See references/tracking-and-ethics.md.
-
Check ethics and disclose. Confirm referral fees are permitted and
disclosed where the client's sector or your jurisdiction requires it.
-
Report referral KPIs. Feed referral count, source, conversion, and value
into the monthly client/agency reporting (monthly-report).
-
Stop activation when consent, disclosure, satisfaction, or payout authority is missing; recover with draft rules and a gap register.
Quality Standards
- Generosity is deliberate. The reward is large enough that clients feel
genuinely thanked, sized against the lifetime value of a won client — referred
clients are measurably more valuable and less likely to churn.
- Double-sided by default. The new client gets something too, so the
referrer feels they did their contact a favour, not sold them.
- Ask at the right moment, with the right words. Timing (post-win) and ease
(a ready-to-send intro) matter more than the size of the reward.
- Formal record, not informal intros. Every referral has a timestamped
submission and an unambiguous source; payout rules are written and known.
- Ethical and disclosed. No undisclosed fees in contexts that forbid them.
- Built on real delivery. The program amplifies genuine satisfaction; it
never substitutes for it.
Anti-Patterns
- Launching before clients experience a win. Fix: require a verified satisfaction trigger.
- Using a one-sided reward that embarrasses the referrer. Fix: offer an approved double-sided or non-cash structure.
- Asking on a fixed date. Fix: ask after a verified outcome and with no pressure.
- Relying on informal "send people my way" with no submission record or
attribution — the most common reason programs quietly fail.
- Setting a token reward without economics. Fix: size and approve it against the qualifying event and margin.
- Paying on an unqualified lead. Fix: tie payout to the documented qualifying event.
- Ignoring disclosure rules. Fix: obtain and record the required sector-specific disclosure.
Outputs
- A documented referral program: reward structure, amounts, and payout rules.
- The kickoff expectation-setting line and the post-win ask scripts/templates.
- A referral submission + attribution mechanism and a tracking log.
- A cross-niche / partner routing rule and reward.
- Referral KPIs wired into monthly reporting.
| Artefact | Consumer | Acceptance condition |
|---|
| Referral programme rules | Clients, partners, finance, and sales | Names eligibility, reward, attribution, disclosure, privacy, payout, expiry, and disputes. |
| Ask and routing plan | Account owner | Uses earned timing, permission, one clear submission route, and no-pressure language. |
| Referral register | Finance and reporting owners | Every record has source, consent, status, attribution, reward, and outcome. |
Evidence Produced
| Evidence | Format | Acceptance condition |
|---|
| Satisfaction trigger | Dated verified win or explicit advocacy signal | No ask rests on assumed happiness. |
| Reward audit trail | Referral, rule version, approval, payout evidence | Rewards reconcile and disclosures are recorded. |
Capability Contract
Design and review default to read-only. Sending asks, sharing contact data, changing CRM, promising or paying rewards, or creating partner obligations requires explicit authority and consent.
Degraded Mode
Fallback if satisfaction, economics, consent, or legal review are unavailable: return draft rules and a gap register. Do not ask, introduce, promise, pay, or claim programme performance.
Decision Rules
| Choice | Action | Failure or risk avoided |
|---|
| Client has a verified win and consents | Make a specific low-pressure ask | Extractive request before advocacy |
| Professional rules restrict rewards | Use permitted recognition or no reward | Undisclosed conflict or ethics breach |
| Referral is outside niche | Route through an approved partner rule | Poor-fit acceptance and attribution dispute |
Worked Example
At a 90-day review, a client confirms the site reduced missed enquiries. With permission, ask for one introduction to a similar business, disclose a service credit, record the introduction source, and pay only after the documented qualifying event.
References
references/reward-structures.md — double-sided vs one-sided, cash / credit /
charity / tiered options, agency referral-fee norms, and how to size rewards.
references/ask-scripts-and-timing.md — setting the expectation at kickoff,
NPS-triggered and post-win timing, and copy-ready ask scripts and email templates.
references/cross-niche-and-partners.md — rewarding and routing referrals
outside the niche, building a reciprocal partner network, and the client-referral
vs partner-program distinction.
references/tracking-and-ethics.md — formal submission, attribution, payout
gating, the informal-intro failure mode, and referral-fee ethics / disclosure.
references/sources.md — attributed sources (Schmitt/Skiera/Van den Bulte,
Jantsch, Coleman, Reichheld) with confidence flags.
Notes
- This skill is a portable execution layer for both Claude Code and Codex.
- Upstream:
agency-client-retention (Advocate phase) earns the referral.
Downstream: local-in-person-acquisition and agency-positioning convert the
referred lead; monthly-report reports referral performance.
- Africa calibration: in relationship-first markets, personal introductions carry
high trust; charity-donation and service-credit rewards often fit professional
networks better than cash. Frame rewards in the local market band — see
../../orchestration/africa-excellence/SKILL.md.
- This skill has no bundled scripts; the workflow is documentary.