fp-ts-pragmatic

name	fp-ts-pragmatic
description	A practical, jargon-free guide to fp-ts functional programming - the 80/20 approach that gets results without the academic overhead. Use when writing TypeScript with fp-ts library.
risk	safe
source	https://github.com/whatiskadudoing/fp-ts-skills
date_added	2026-02-27

Pragmatic Functional Programming

Read this first. This guide cuts through the academic jargon and shows you what actually matters. No category theory. No abstract nonsense. Just patterns that make your code better.

When to Use This Skill

• When starting with fp-ts and need practical guidance
• When writing TypeScript code that handles nullable values, errors, or async operations
• When you want cleaner, more maintainable functional code without the academic overhead
• When refactoring imperative code to functional style

The Golden Rule

If functional programming makes your code harder to read, don't use it.

FP is a tool, not a religion. Use it when it helps. Skip it when it doesn't.

---

The 80/20 of FP

These five patterns give you most of the benefits. Master these before exploring anything else.

1. Pipe: Chain Operations Clearly

Instead of nesting function calls or creating intermediate variables, chain operations in reading order.

import { pipe } from 'fp-ts/function'

// Before: Hard to read (inside-out)
const result = format(validate(parse(input)))

// Before: Too many variables
const parsed = parse(input)
const validated = validate(parsed)
const result = format(validated)

// After: Clear, linear flow
const result = pipe(
  input,
  parse,
  validate,
  format
)

When to use pipe:

• 3+ transformations on the same data
• You find yourself naming throwaway variables
• Logic reads better top-to-bottom

When to skip pipe:

• Just 1-2 operations (direct call is fine)
• The operations don't naturally chain

2. Option: Handle Missing Values Without null Checks

Stop writing if (x !== null && x !== undefined) everywhere.

import * as O from 'fp-ts/Option'
import { pipe } from 'fp-ts/function'

// Before: Defensive null checking
function getUserCity(user: User | null): string {
  if (user === null) return 'Unknown'
  if (user.address === null) return 'Unknown'
  if (user.address.city === null) return 'Unknown'
  return user.address.city
}

// After: Chain through potential missing values
const getUserCity = (user: User | null): string =>
  pipe(
    O.fromNullable(user),
    O.flatMap(u => O.fromNullable(u.address)),
    O.flatMap(a => O.fromNullable(a.city)),
    O.getOrElse( )
  )

Plain language translation:

• O.fromNullable(x) = "wrap this value, treating null/undefined as 'nothing'"
• O.flatMap(fn) = "if we have something, apply this function"
• O.getOrElse(() => default) = "unwrap, or use this default if nothing"

3. Either: Make Errors Explicit

Stop throwing exceptions for expected failures. Return errors as values.

import * as E from 'fp-ts/Either'
import { pipe } from 'fp-ts/function'

// Before: Hidden failure mode
function parseAge(input: string): number {
  const age = parseInt(input, 10)
  if (isNaN(age)) throw new Error('Invalid age')
  if (age < 0) throw new Error('Age cannot be negative')
  return age
}

// After: Errors are visible in the type
function parseAge(input: string): E.Either<string, number> {
  const age = parseInt(input, 10)
  if (isNaN(age)) return E.left('Invalid age')
  if (age < 0) return E.left('Age cannot be negative')
  return E.right(age)
}


 result = (userInput)
 (E.(result)) {
  .()
}  {
  .()
}

Plain language translation:

• E.right(value) = "success with this value"
• E.left(error) = "failure with this error"
• E.isRight(x) = "did it succeed?"

4. Map: Transform Without Unpacking

Transform values inside containers without extracting them first.

import * as O from 'fp-ts/Option'
import * as E from 'fp-ts/Either'
import * as A from 'fp-ts/Array'
import { pipe } from 'fp-ts/function'

// Transform inside Option
const maybeUser: O.Option<User> = O.some({ name: 'Alice', age: 30 })
const maybeName: O.Option<string> = pipe(
  maybeUser,
  O.map(user => user.name)
)

// Transform inside Either
const result: E.Either<Error, number> = E.right(5)
const doubled: E.Either<Error, number> = pipe(
  result,
  E.map(n => n * 2)
)

// Transform arrays (same concept!)
const numbers = [, , ]
 doubled = (
  numbers,
  A.( n * )
)

5. FlatMap: Chain Operations That Might Fail

When each step might fail, chain them together.

import * as E from 'fp-ts/Either'
import { pipe } from 'fp-ts/function'

const parseJSON = (s: string): E.Either<string, unknown> =>
  E.tryCatch(() => JSON.parse(s), () => 'Invalid JSON')

const extractEmail = (data: unknown): E.Either<string, string> => {
  if (typeof data === 'object' && data !== null && 'email' in data) {
    return E.right((data as { email: string }).email)
  }
  return E.left('No email field')
}

const validateEmail = (email: string): E.Either<string, string> =>
  email.includes('@') ? E.right(email) : E.left('Invalid email format')

// Chain all steps - if any fails, the whole thing fails
 getValidEmail = (: ): E.<, > =>
  (
    (input),
    E.(extractEmail),
    E.(validateEmail)
  )

Plain language: flatMap means "if this succeeded, try the next thing"

---

When NOT to Use FP

Functional programming is not always the answer. Here's when to keep it simple.

Simple Null Checks

// Just use optional chaining - it's built into the language
const city = user?.address?.city ?? 'Unknown'

// DON'T overcomplicate it
const city = pipe(
  O.fromNullable(user),
  O.flatMap(u => O.fromNullable(u.address)),
  O.flatMap(a => O.fromNullable(a.city)),
  O.getOrElse(() => 'Unknown')
)

Simple Loops

// A for loop is fine when you need early exit or complex logic
function findFirst(items: Item[], predicate: (i: Item) => boolean): Item | null {
  for (const item of items) {
    if (predicate(item)) return item
  }
  return null
}

// DON'T force FP when it doesn't help
const result = pipe(
  items,
  A.findFirst(predicate),
  O.toNullable
)

Performance-Critical Code

// For hot paths, imperative is faster (no intermediate arrays)
function sumLarge(numbers: number[]): number {
  let sum = 0
  for (let i = 0; i < numbers.length; i++) {
    sum += numbers[i]
  }
  return sum
}

// fp-ts creates intermediate structures
const sum = pipe(numbers, A.reduce(0, (acc, n) => acc + n))

When Your Team Doesn't Know FP

If you're the only one who can read the code, it's not good code.

// If your team knows this pattern
async function getUser(id: string): Promise<User | null> {
  try {
    const response = await fetch(`/api/users/${id}`)
    if (!response.ok) return null
    return await response.json()
  } catch {
    return null
  }
}

// Don't force this on them
const getUser = (id: string): TE.TaskEither<Error, User> =>
  pipe(
    TE.tryCatch(() => fetch(`/api/users/${id}`), E.toError),
    TE.flatMap(r => r.ok ? TE.right(r) : TE.left(new Error())),
    .( .( r.(), E.))
  )

---

Quick Wins: Easy Changes That Improve Code Today

1. Replace Nested Ternaries with pipe + fold

// Before: Nested ternary nightmare
const message = user === null
  ? 'No user'
  : user.isAdmin
    ? `Admin: ${user.name}`
    : `User: ${user.name}`

// After: Clear case handling
const message = pipe(
  O.fromNullable(user),
  O.fold(
    () => 'No user',
    (u) => u.isAdmin ? `Admin: ${u.name}` : `User: ${u.name}`
  )
)

2. Replace try-catch with tryCatch

// Before: try-catch everywhere
let config
try {
  config = JSON.parse(rawConfig)
} catch {
  config = defaultConfig
}

// After: One-liner
const config = pipe(
  E.tryCatch(() => JSON.parse(rawConfig), () => 'parse error'),
  E.getOrElse(() => defaultConfig)
)

3. Replace undefined Returns with Option

// Before: Caller might forget to check
function findUser(id: string): User | undefined {
  return users.find(u => u.id === id)
}

// After: Type forces caller to handle missing case
function findUser(id: string): O.Option<User> {
  return O.fromNullable(users.find(u => u.id === id))
}

4. Replace Error Strings with Typed Errors

// Before: Just strings
function validate(data: unknown): E.Either<string, User> {
  // ...
  return E.left('validation failed')
}

// After: Structured errors
type ValidationError = {
  field: string
  message: string
}

function validate(data: unknown): E.Either<ValidationError, User> {
  // ...
  return E.left({ field: 'email', message: 'Invalid format' })
}

5. Use const Assertions for Error Types

// Create specific error types without classes
const NotFound = (id: string) => ({ _tag: 'NotFound' as const, id })
const Unauthorized = { _tag: 'Unauthorized' as const }
const ValidationFailed = (errors: string[]) =>
  ({ _tag: 'ValidationFailed' as const, errors })

type AppError =
  | ReturnType<typeof NotFound>
  | typeof Unauthorized
  | ReturnType<typeof ValidationFailed>

// Now you can pattern match
const handleError = (error: AppError): string => {
  switch (error._tag) {
    case 'NotFound': return `Item ${error.id} not found`
    case 'Unauthorized': return 'Please log in'
    case :  error..()
  }
}

---

Common Refactors: Before and After

Callback Hell to Pipe

// Before
fetchUser(id, (user) => {
  if (!user) return handleNoUser()
  fetchPosts(user.id, (posts) => {
    if (!posts) return handleNoPosts()
    fetchComments(posts[0].id, (comments) => {
      render(user, posts, comments)
    })
  })
})

// After (with TaskEither for async)
import * as TE from 'fp-ts/TaskEither'

const loadData = (id: string) =>
  pipe(
    fetchUser(id),
    TE.flatMap(user => pipe(
      fetchPosts(user.id),
      TE.map(posts => ({ user, posts }))
    )),
    TE.flatMap(({ user, posts }) => pipe(
      fetchComments(posts[0].),
      .( ({ user, posts, comments }))
    ))
  )


 result =  ()()
(
  result,
  E.(handleError,  (user, posts, comments))
)

Multiple null Checks to Option Chain

// Before
function getManagerEmail(employee: Employee): string | null {
  if (!employee.department) return null
  if (!employee.department.manager) return null
  if (!employee.department.manager.email) return null
  return employee.department.manager.email
}

// After
const getManagerEmail = (employee: Employee): O.Option<string> =>
  pipe(
    O.fromNullable(employee.department),
    O.flatMap(d => O.fromNullable(d.manager)),
    O.flatMap(m => O.fromNullable(m.email))
  )

// Use it
pipe(
  getManagerEmail(employee),
  O.fold(
    () => sendToDefault(),
     (email)
  )
)

Validation with Multiple Checks

// Before: Throws on first error
function validateUser(data: unknown): User {
  if (!data || typeof data !== 'object') throw new Error('Must be object')
  const obj = data as Record<string, unknown>
  if (typeof obj.email !== 'string') throw new Error('Email required')
  if (!obj.email.includes('@')) throw new Error('Invalid email')
  if (typeof obj.age !== 'number') throw new Error('Age required')
  if (obj.age < 0) throw new Error('Age must be positive')
  return obj as User
}

// After: Returns first error, type-safe
 validateUser = (: ): E.<, > =>
  (
    E.,
    E.(, 
       data ===  && data !== 
        ? E.(data  <, >)
        : E.()
    ),
    E.(, 
       obj. ===  && obj..()
        ? E.(obj.)
        : E.()
    ),
    E.(, 
       obj. ===  && obj. >= 
        ? E.(obj.)
        : E.()
    ),
    E.( ({ email, age }))
  )

Promise Chain to TaskEither

// Before
async function processOrder(orderId: string): Promise<Receipt> {
  const order = await fetchOrder(orderId)
  if (!order) throw new Error('Order not found')

  const validated = await validateOrder(order)
  if (!validated.success) throw new Error(validated.error)

  const payment = await processPayment(validated.order)
  if (!payment.success) throw new Error('Payment failed')

  return generateReceipt(payment)
}

// After
const processOrder = (orderId: string): TE.TaskEither<string, Receipt> =>
  pipe(
    fetchOrderTE(orderId),
    TE.flatMap(order =>
      order ? .(order) : .()
    ),
    .(validateOrderTE),
    .(processPaymentTE),
    .(generateReceipt)
  )

---

The Readability Rule

Before using any FP pattern, ask: "Would a junior developer understand this?"

Too Clever (Avoid)

const result = pipe(
  data,
  A.filter(flow(prop('status'), equals('active'))),
  A.map(flow(prop('value'), multiply(2))),
  A.reduce(monoid.concat, monoid.empty),
  O.fromPredicate(gt(threshold))
)

Just Right (Prefer)

const activeItems = data.filter(item => item.status === 'active')
const doubledValues = activeItems.map(item => item.value * 2)
const total = doubledValues.reduce((sum, val) => sum + val, 0)
const result = total > threshold ? O.some(total) : O.none

The Middle Ground (Often Best)

const result = pipe(
  data,
  A.filter(item => item.status === 'active'),
  A.map(item => item.value * 2),
  A.reduce(0, (sum, val) => sum + val),
  total => total > threshold ? O.some(total) : O.none
)

---

Cheat Sheet

What you want	Plain language	fp-ts
Handle null/undefined	"Wrap this nullable"	O.fromNullable(x)
Default for missing	"Use this if nothing"	O.getOrElse(() => default)
Transform if present	"If something, change it"	O.map(fn)
Chain nullable operations	"If something, try this"	O.flatMap(fn)
Return success	"Worked, here's the value"	E.right(value)
Return failure	"Failed, here's why"	E.left(error)
Wrap throwing function	"Try this, catch errors"	E.tryCatch(fn, onError)
Handle both cases	"Do this for error, that for success"	E.fold(onLeft, onRight)
Chain operations	"Then do this, then that"	pipe(x, fn1, fn2, fn3)

---

When to Level Up

Once comfortable with these patterns, explore:

1. TaskEither - Async operations that can fail (replaces Promise + try/catch)
2. Validation - Collect ALL errors instead of stopping at first
3. Reader - Dependency injection without classes
4. Do notation - Cleaner syntax for multiple bindings

But don't rush. The basics here will handle 80% of real-world scenarios. Get comfortable with these before adding more tools to your belt.

---

Summary

1. Use pipe for 3+ operations
2. Use Option for nullable chains
3. Use Either for operations that can fail
4. Use map to transform wrapped values
5. Use flatMap to chain operations that might fail
6. Skip FP when it hurts readability
7. Keep it simple - if your team can't read it, it's not good code

Limitations

• Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
• Do not treat the output as a substitute for enprojectnment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
• Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.