Skip to main content

evolve-skill

Evolve an existing skill by refining its content in-place or creating an advanced variant. Covers assessing the current skill, gathering evolution requirements, choosing scope (refinement vs. variant), applying changes, updating version metadata, and synchronizing the registry and cross-references. Use when a skill's procedure steps are outdated, user feedback reveals gaps, a skill needs a complexity upgrade, an advanced variant is needed alongside the original, or related skills are added and cross-references are stale.

الانتقال إلى التثبيت

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
pjt222/agent-almanac
آخر نشاط في المصدر
١٥ سبتمبر ٢٠٢٦ في ٠٨:٥٩
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
٣٤
التفرعات
٤

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
evolve-skill
description
Evolve an existing skill by refining its content in-place or creating an advanced variant. Covers assessing the current skill, gathering evolution requirements, choosing scope (refinement vs. variant), applying changes, updating version metadata, and synchronizing the registry and cross-references. Use when a skill's procedure steps are outdated, user feedback reveals gaps, a skill needs a complexity upgrade, an advanced variant is needed alongside the original, or related skills are added and cross-references are stale.
license
MIT
allowed-tools
Read Write Edit Bash Grep Glob
metadata
{"author":"Philipp Thoss","version":"2.0","domain":"general","complexity":"intermediate","language":"multi","tags":"meta, skill, agentskills, maintenance, evolution, versioning"}
# Evolve an Existing Skill Improve, extend, or create an advanced variant of a skill that was originally authored with `create-skill`. This procedure covers the maintenance side of the skill lifecycle: assessing gaps, applying targeted improvements, bumping versions, and keeping the registry and cross-references in sync. ## When to Use - A skill's procedure steps are outdated or incomplete after tooling changes - User feedback reveals missing pitfalls, unclear steps, or weak validation - A skill needs to grow from basic to intermediate (or intermediate to advanced) - An advanced variant is needed alongside the original (e.g., `create-r-package` and `create-r-package-advanced`) - Related skills were added or removed and cross-references are stale ## Inputs - **Required**: Path to the existing SKILL.md to evolve - **Required**: Evolution trigger (feedback, tooling change, complexity upgrade, new related skills, discovered pitfalls) - **Optional**: Target complexity level if changing (basic, intermediate, advanced) - **Optional**: Whether to create an advanced variant instead of refining in-place (default: refine in-place) ## Procedure ### Step 1: Assess the Current Skill Read the existing SKILL.md and evaluate each section against the quality checklist: | Section | What to Check | Common Issues | |---|---|---| | Frontmatter | All required fields present, `description` < 1024 chars | Missing `tags`, stale `version` | | When to Use | 3-5 concrete trigger conditions | Vague or overlapping triggers | | Inputs | Required vs optional clearly separated | Missing defaults for optional inputs | | Procedure | Each step has code + Expected + On failure | Missing On failure blocks, pseudocode instead of real commands | | Validation | Each item is binary pass/fail | Subjective criteria ("code is clean") | | Common Pitfalls | 3-6 with cause and avoidance | Too generic ("be careful") | | Related Skills | 2-5 valid skill references | Stale references to renamed/removed skills | ```bash # Read the skill cat skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md # Check frontmatter parses head -20 skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md # Verify related skills still exist grep -oP '`[\w-]+`' skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md | sort -u ``` **Expected:** A list of specific gaps, weaknesses, or improvement opportunities. **On failure:** If the SKILL.md doesn't exist or has no frontmatter, this skill doesn't apply — use `create-skill` instead to author it from scratch. ### Step 2: Gather Evolution Requirements Identify and categorize what triggered the evolution: | Trigger | Example | Typical Scope | |---|---|---| | User feedback | "Step 3 is unclear" | Refinement | | Tooling change | New API version, deprecated command | Refinement | | Discovered pitfall | Common failure not documented | Refinement | | Complexity upgrade | Skill is too shallow for real use | Refinement or variant | | New related skills | Adjacent skill was added | Refinement (cross-refs) | | Advanced use case | Power users need deeper coverage | Variant | Document the specific changes needed before editing. List each change with its target section. **Expected:** A concrete list of changes (e.g., "Add On failure to Step 4", "Add new Step 6 for edge case X", "Update Related Skills to include `new-skill`"). **On failure:** If the changes are unclear, consult the user for clarification before proceeding. Vague evolution goals produce vague improvements. ### Step 3: Choose Evolution Scope Use this decision matrix to determine whether to refine in-place or create a variant: | Criteria | Refinement (in-place) | Advanced Variant (new skill) | |---|---|---| | Skill ID | Unchanged | New ID: `<skill>-advanced` | | File path | Same SKILL.md | New directory | | Version bump | Minor (major only if breaking) | Starts at 1.0 | | Complexity | May increase | Higher than original | | Registry | No new entry | New entry added | | Symlinks | No change | New symlinks needed | | Original skill | Modified directly | Left intact, gains cross-reference | **Refinement**: Choose when improving quality, fixing gaps, or adding modest new content. The skill keeps its identity. **Variant**: Choose when the evolved version would double the length, change the target audience, or require substantially different inputs. The original stays as-is for simpler use cases. **Expected:** A clear decision — refinement or variant — with rationale. **On failure:** If unsure, default to refinement. You can always extract a variant later; it's harder to merge one back. ### Step 4: Apply Content Changes #### For Refinements Edit the existing SKILL.md directly: - Open for editing - Add/revise procedure steps - Strengthen Expected/On failure pairs - Add tables or examples - Update When to Use triggers - Revise Inputs if scope changed Follow these editing rules: - Preserve all existing sections — add content, don't remove sections - Keep step numbering sequential after insertions - Every new or modified step must have both Expected and On failure - New pitfalls go at the end of the Common Pitfalls section — but if appending would push the count above 6, do not append: evict the pitfall with the lowest rediscovery cost instead, the one a competent agent would most likely avoid unaided. An eviction must name the Procedure step or section that already teaches the evicted content — if none does, first fold the pitfall's counterintuitive fact into the step that should carry it, then evict. Pitfalls are ranked by what they save, not by age. Skills already over the cap are grandfathered: evict when a later evolution adds a pitfall, not as a bulk retro-edit - New related skills go at the end of the Related Skills section #### For Variants ```bash # Create the variant directory mkdir -p skills/<skill-name>-advanced/ # Copy the original as a starting point cp skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md skills/<skill-name>-advanced/SKILL.md # Edit the variant: # - Change `name` to `<skill-name>-advanced` # - Update `description` to reflect the advanced scope # - Raise `complexity` (e.g., intermediate → advanced) # - Reset `version` to "1.0" # - Add/expand procedure steps for the advanced use case # - Reference the original in Related Skills as a prerequisite ``` **Expected:** The SKILL.md (refined or new variant) passes the assessment checklist from Step 1. **On failure:** If a step edit breaks the document structure, use `git diff` to review changes and revert partial edits with `git checkout -- <file>`. ### Step 4.5: Sync Translated Variants > **Required when translations exist.** Applies to human authors and AI agents > alike. **Do not bump `source_commit`** — an evolve run that changes English > without retranslating leaves every provenance field untouched, and the staleness > it creates is true rather than noise (#405, #616). Check which translations exist for the evolved skill. They are about to become stale, and this step is how you leave them honestly stale rather than falsely fresh: ```bash # Check for existing translations ls i18n/*/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md 2>/dev/null ``` #### Which provenance field may move, and by what `scripts/lib/provenance.js` is the authority on this; the table is its summary. | Field | Moves when | Moved by | |---|---|---| | `source_commit` | a **human** retranslates against a newer English revision | that human, in the commit carrying the retranslated prose | | `fence_basis_commit` | frozen-fence bytes are propagated into the mirror **and verified** | `normalize-i18n-fences.js` when it does the propagating; `tools/provenance-field.mjs` when you propagate by hand, after `check:fence-propagation` passes | Which of those applies depends on **what you edited**, and getting this wrong is how a provenance field becomes a false claim: - **Prose only** — neither field moves. The mirror is genuinely stale afterwards, `npm run validate:translations` is right to say so, and bumping `source_commit` would assert a translation event that never happened, suppressing the one signal that would have surfaced the drift (#405, #616). - **A frozen fence** — `source_commit` still does not move, but the mirrors' fence bodies just changed, so every `fence_basis_commit` naming the old revision is now false. Step 2 below restamps them. Leaving them is the failure this table exists to prevent. - **A retranslation of one locale** — that locale's `source_commit` moves, in the commit carrying the prose, and the others' do not. `normalize-i18n-fences.js` is named above for the case where it does the propagating. It does **not** fire on a hand propagation — measured on this skill's own rewrite, where a preview reported five files to change and not one was a mirror of these skills. Do not wait for it to restamp what you copied by hand. Never repair a provenance field in bulk with `sed`. The form this step used to carry was a substitution anchored at `^source_commit` — column 0 — which silently no-ops on every mirror that nests provenance under `metadata:` at two-space indent: wrong and unreliable at once. Route any bulk field edit through `tools/provenance-field.mjs`, which is indent-aware and refuses to move `source_commit` unless you declare you are the human retranslating. (That anchored form is deliberately not reproduced here. #616's acceptance criterion is a grep, and prose quoting the thing it forbids would defeat the check that proves the thing is gone.) 1. Read which mirrors this change made stale, and leave them stale: ```bash npm run validate:translations ``` 2. If you edited a **frozen fence** in English, its bytes must reach all ten mirrors in this same commit, verified by bytes rather than by the fence gate — that gate accepts a body from any English revision, so it cannot tell you whether your edit landed. Then restamp the mirrors you touched, because their old `fence_basis_commit` now names a revision whose fences they no longer carry: ```bash npm run check:fence-propagation -- --id <skill-name> node tools/provenance-field.mjs --field fence_basis_commit --set $(git rev-parse --short HEAD) <mirror paths> ``` 3. Flag the affected locales in the commit message, naming what changed: ```text evolve(<skill-name>): <description of changes> Translations now stale, source_commit deliberately NOT bumped: de, zh-CN, ja, es Changed sections: <list sections that changed> ``` 4. Regenerate the translation status files: ```bash npm run translation:status ``` #### If no translations exist No action needed. Proceed to Step 5. #### For variants Defer translation of new variants until the variant stabilizes (1-2 versions). Translating a v1.0 variant that may change substantially by v1.2 wastes effort. Add translations after the variant has been refined at least once. **Expected:** `source_commit` unchanged everywhere. `npm run validate:translations` reports more stale mirrors than before — that count rising is the correct outcome of an evolve run, not a failure to repair. If you edited a frozen fence, `fence_basis_commit` on the mirrors you touched names the commit carrying the new bytes; if you edited only prose, no provenance field moved at all. If a frozen fence was edited, `check:fence-propagation` shows every mirror carrying the new bytes. `npm run translation:status` exits 0. **On failure:** If `check:fence-propagation` reports a mirror whose fence body differs, the byte-copy did not reach it: copy the English fence body verbatim into that mirror and re-run — and read its output rather than its exit code, which it shares with the `unalignable` case. If a frontmatter field genuinely needs a bulk edit, use `tools/provenance-field.mjs`; a substitution anchored at column 0 matches nothing in a mirror that nests provenance under `metadata:`, and reports success while changing nothing. ### Step 5: Update Version and Metadata Skill versions are two-part, `MAJOR.MINOR` — there is no patch component, so every change lands in one of exactly two buckets: | Change Type | Version Bump | Example | |---|---|---| | Typo fix, wording clarification | Minor: 1.0 → 1.1 | Fixed unclear sentence in Step 3 | | Additive: new step, new pitfall, new table | Minor: 1.0 → 1.1 | Added Step 7 for edge case handling | | Breaking: restructured procedure, changed inputs | Major: 1.0 → 2.0 | Reorganized from 5 to 8 steps | **The criterion is whether existing callers break, not how much text changed.** Bump MINOR when a caller who followed the previous version still gets a correct result — clarifications and additions are minor no matter how many lines they touch. Bump MAJOR (and reset MINOR to 0) only when the change invalidates how the skill was being used: steps renumbered or removed, required Inputs added or renamed, or an Expected outcome redefined so that following the old version now produces the wrong result. Existing corpus versions are grandfathered — do not retro-bump a skill to correct a historical mislabel. Also update: - `complexity` if the scope expanded (e.g., basic → intermediate) - `tags` if the coverage area changed - `description` if the skill's scope is materially different **Expected:** Frontmatter `version` reflects the magnitude of changes. New variants start at `"1.0"`. **On failure:** If you forget to bump the version, the next evolution will have no way to distinguish the current state from the previous one. Always bump before committing. ### Step 6: Update Registry and Cross-References #### For Refinements No registry changes are needed (path unchanged). Update cross-references only if Related Skills changed in other skills: ```bash # Check if any skill references the evolved skill grep -r "<skill-name>" skills/*/SKILL.md ``` #### For Variants Add the new skill to `skills/_registry.yml`: ```yaml - id: <skill-name>-advanced path: <skill-name>-advanced/SKILL.md complexity: advanced language: multi description: One-line description of the advanced variant ``` Then: 1. Increment `total_skills` at the top of the registry 2. Add Related Skills cross-reference in the original skill pointing to the variant 3. Add Related Skills cross-reference in the variant pointing to the original 4. Create symlinks for slash command discovery: ```bash # Project-level ln -s ../../skills/<skill-name>-advanced .claude/skills/<skill-name>-advanced # Global ln -s /mnt/d/dev/p/agent-almanac/skills/<skill-name>-advanced ~/.claude/skills/<skill-name>-advanced ``` **Expected:** Registry `total_skills` matches `find skills -name SKILL.md | wc -l`. Cross-references are bidirectional. **On failure:** If the registry count is wrong, run `find skills -name SKILL.md | wc -l` to get the true count and correct the registry. For broken symlinks, use `readlink -f` to debug resolution. ### Step 7: Validate the Evolved Skill Run the full validation checklist: - [ ] SKILL.md exists at the expected path - [ ] YAML frontmatter parses without errors - [ ] `version` was bumped (refinement) or set to "1.0" (variant) - [ ] All sections present: When to Use, Inputs, Procedure, Validation, Common Pitfalls, Related Skills - [ ] Every procedure step has Expected and On failure blocks - [ ] Related Skills reference valid, existing skill names - [ ] Registry entry exists with correct path (variants only) - [ ] `total_skills` count matches actual skill count on disk - [ ] Symlinks resolve correctly (variants only) - [ ] `git diff` shows no accidental deletions from the original content - [ ] For refinements with translations: no provenance field moved; the now-stale locales named in the commit message ```bash # Verify frontmatter head -20 skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md # Count skills on disk vs registry find skills -name SKILL.md | wc -l grep total_skills skills/_registry.yml # Check symlinks (for variants) ls -la .claude/skills/<skill-name>-advanced readlink -f .claude/skills/<skill-name>-advanced/SKILL.md # Review all changes git diff ``` **Expected:** All checklist items pass. The evolved skill is ready to commit. **On failure:** Address each failing item individually. The most common post-evolution issue is a stale `total_skills` count — always verify it last. ## Validation - [ ] SKILL.md exists and has valid YAML frontmatter - [ ] `version` field reflects the changes made - [ ] All procedure steps have Expected and On failure blocks - [ ] Related Skills references are valid (no broken cross-references) - [ ] Registry `total_skills` matches actual count on disk - [ ] For variants: new entry in `_registry.yml` with correct path - [ ] For variants: symlinks created at `.claude/skills/` and `~/.claude/skills/` - [ ] `git diff` confirms no accidental content removal - [ ] For refinements with translations: no provenance field moved; the now-stale locales named in the commit message ## Common Pitfalls - **Forgetting to bump version**: Without version bumps, there's no way to track what changed or when. Always update `version` in frontmatter before committing. - **Accidental content deletion**: When restructuring steps, it's easy to drop an On failure block or a table row. Always review `git diff` before committing. - **Stale cross-references**: When creating a variant, both the original and the variant need to reference each other. One-directional references leave the graph incomplete. - **Registry count drift**: After creating a variant, the `total_skills` count must be incremented. Forgetting this causes validation failures in other skills that check the registry. - **Scope creep during refinement**: A refinement that doubles the skill's length should probably be a variant instead. If you're adding more than 3 new procedure steps, reconsider the scope decision from Step 3. - **Avoid `git mv` on NTFS-mounted paths (WSL)**: On `/mnt/` paths, `git mv` for directories can create broken permissions (`d?????????`). Use `mkdir -p` + copy files + `git rm` the old path instead. See the [environment guide](../../guides/setting-up-your-environment.md) troubleshooting section. ## Related Skills - `create-skill` — foundation for authoring new skills; evolve-skill assumes this was followed originally - `commit-changes` — commit the evolved skill with a descriptive message - `configure-git-repository` — version-controlled skill changes - `security-audit-codebase` — review evolved skills for accidentally included secrets
عرض على GitHub