| name | testing-patterns |
| description | Jest testing patterns, factory functions, mocking strategies, and TDD workflow. Use when writing unit tests, creating test factories, or following TDD red-green-refactor cycle. |
Testing Patterns
Purpose
Jest testing patterns, factory functions, mocking strategies, and TDD workflow. Use when writing unit tests, creating test factories, or following TDD red-green-refactor cycle.
This skill provides operational guidance for Testing Patterns, including tool usage patterns, workflows, and quality expectations aligned with Syncolab skill standards.
When to Use
- Use when the user needs help with Testing Patterns.
- When integrations for this domain are available and the task matches the workflows below.
When NOT to Use
- When the task is unrelated to Testing Patterns or covered by a more specific skill.
- When required integrations or credentials are unavailable.
Expected Outcome
- Correct use of domain tools with verified results (not fabricated).
- Clear summary of actions taken, data returned, and recommended next steps.
- Errors and missing permissions reported explicitly.
Inputs to Gather
- User goal, constraints, and any identifiers (URLs, IDs, project keys).
- Available tool sets and connection status.
- Relevant context from related systems before destructive writes.
Workflow
- Confirm the request maps to Testing Patterns and required tools are available.
- Gather identifiers and scope (project, channel, repo, date range, etc.).
- Follow the domain guidance below; prefer list/search before get/update when applicable.
- Execute tool calls using schemas from the integration; never invent tool output.
- Summarize results and offer logical follow-ups.
Testing Patterns and Utilities
Testing Philosophy
Test-Driven Development (TDD):
- Write failing test FIRST
- Implement minimal code to pass
- Refactor after green
- Never write production code without a failing test
Behavior-Driven Testing:
- Test behavior, not implementation
- Focus on public APIs and business requirements
- Avoid testing implementation details
- Use descriptive test names that describe behavior
Factory Pattern:
- Create
getMockX(overrides?: Partial<X>) functions
- Provide sensible defaults
- Allow overriding specific properties
- Keep tests DRY and maintainable
Test Utilities
Custom Render Function
Create a custom render that wraps components with required providers:
import { render } from '@testing-library/react-native';
import { ThemeProvider } from './theme';
export const renderWithTheme = (ui: React.ReactElement) => {
return render(
<ThemeProvider>{ui}</ThemeProvider>
);
};
Usage:
import { renderWithTheme } from 'utils/testUtils';
import { screen } from '@testing-library/react-native';
it('should render component', () => {
renderWithTheme(<MyComponent />);
expect(screen.getByText('Hello')).toBeTruthy();
});
Factory Pattern
Component Props Factory
import { ComponentProps } from 'react';
const getMockMyComponentProps = (
overrides?: Partial<ComponentProps<typeof MyComponent>>
) => {
return {
title: 'Default Title',
count: 0,
onPress: jest.fn(),
isLoading: false,
...overrides,
};
};
it('should render with custom title', () => {
const props = getMockMyComponentProps({ title: 'Custom Title' });
renderWithTheme(<MyComponent {...props} />);
expect(screen.getByText('Custom Title')).toBeTruthy();
});
Data Factory
interface User {
id: string;
name: string;
email: string;
role: 'admin' | 'user';
}
const getMockUser = (overrides?: Partial<User>): User => {
return {
id: '123',
name: 'John Doe',
email: 'john@example.com',
role: 'user',
...overrides,
};
};
it('should display admin badge for admin users', () => {
const user = getMockUser({ role: 'admin' });
renderWithTheme(<UserCard user={user} />);
expect(screen.getByText('Admin')).toBeTruthy();
});
Mocking Patterns
Mocking Modules
jest.mock('utils/analytics');
jest.mock('utils/analytics', () => ({
Analytics: {
logEvent: jest.fn(),
},
}));
const mockLogEvent = jest.requireMock('utils/analytics').Analytics.logEvent;
Mocking GraphQL Hooks
jest.mock('./GetItems.generated', () => ({
useGetItemsQuery: jest.fn(),
}));
const mockUseGetItemsQuery = jest.requireMock(
'./GetItems.generated'
).useGetItemsQuery as jest.Mock;
mockUseGetItemsQuery.mockReturnValue({
data: { items: [] },
loading: false,
error: undefined,
});
Test Structure
describe('ComponentName', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
jest.clearAllMocks();
});
describe('Rendering', () => {
it('should render component with default props', () => {});
it('should render loading state when loading', () => {});
});
describe('User interactions', () => {
it('should call onPress when button is clicked', async () => {});
});
describe('Edge cases', () => {
it('should handle empty data gracefully', () => {});
});
});
Query Patterns
expect(screen.getByText('Hello')).toBeTruthy();
expect(screen.queryByText('Goodbye')).toBeNull();
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.findByText('Loaded')).toBeTruthy();
});
User Interaction Patterns
import { fireEvent, screen } from '@testing-library/react-native';
it('should submit form on button click', async () => {
const onSubmit = jest.fn();
renderWithTheme(<LoginForm onSubmit={onSubmit} />);
fireEvent.changeText(screen.getByLabelText('Email'), 'user@example.com');
fireEvent.changeText(screen.getByLabelText('Password'), 'password123');
fireEvent.press(screen.getByTestId('login-button'));
await waitFor(() => {
expect(onSubmit).toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
Testing Mock Behavior Instead of Real Behavior
expect(mockFetchData).toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(screen.getByText('John Doe')).toBeTruthy();
Not Using Factories
it('test 1', () => {
const user = { id: '1', name: 'John', email: 'john@test.com', role: 'user' };
});
it('test 2', () => {
const user = { id: '2', name: 'Jane', email: 'jane@test.com' };
});
const user = getMockUser({ name: 'Custom Name' });
Best Practices
- Always use factory functions for props and data
- Test behavior, not implementation
- Use descriptive test names
- Organize with describe blocks
- Clear mocks between tests
- Keep tests focused - one behavior per test
Running Tests
npm test
npm run test:coverage
npm test ComponentName.test.tsx
Integration with Other Skills
- react-ui-patterns: Test all UI states (loading, error, empty, success)
- systematic-debugging: Write test that reproduces bug before fixing
Tool Availability Rules
| Access | Behavior |
|---|
| Full tool access | Execute workflows, verify outputs, report errors. |
| Read-only | Inspect and plan; provide exact commands or dispatch request for writes. |
| No integration | State limitation; do not fabricate API results. |
Related tool sets
cypress
playwright
selenium
Review / Decision / Execution Criteria
- Prefer smallest safe change; confirm destructive actions with the user.
- Use evidence from tool responses; cite IDs and links when present.
- Match integration-specific conventions (JQL, RFC3339, A1 notation, etc.).
Output Format
Report:
- What was requested and what was done.
- Key results (tables or bullets).
- Errors, blockers, or missing permissions.
- Suggested next steps.
Quality Bar
- Specific, actionable, and grounded in tool output.
- Concise unless the user asked for detail.
- Respect rate limits, pagination, and API semantics.
Safety and Boundaries
- Do not commit secrets, tokens, or PII into skills or user-visible logs.
- Do not fabricate validation, send, or write confirmations.
- Confirm destructive operations (delete, destroy, mass update) when appropriate.
Escalation / Dispatch Rules
- If the task spans multiple domains, use or suggest related skills via
relationships.skills.
- If write access is required but unavailable, dispatch or ask the user to enable tools.
References
- Legacy content migrated from
skills/old_skills.json (testing-patterns).
skills/skill.instruction.md, skills/meta.instructions.md